Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accreditation for centers of sarcoma surgery

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms which may be subclassified into over 70 specific histologies and may be distributed throughout the body. Approximately one-half arises in the extremities and one-third arises in the abdomen, pelvis, and retroperitoneum. The diversity and rarity of sarcomas combined with the quite large number of affected patients are factors which underline of the importance of networking in diagnosis, therapy, and research dealing with rare cancers. The expertise of the treating center is one of the most significant factors affecting survival in STS. The optimal treatment of locally recurrent disease is to prevent it; aggressive multidisciplinary treatment of the primary disease is thus required, as adjuvant therapies cannot compensate for inadequate surgery. Treatment within specialized multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) is crucial; a body of expertise in all the areas of diagnosis and treatment is required to manage STS appropriately. Conformity to approved treatment guidelines is improved when patients are treated by an MDT in a reference centre. Traditionally, peer-reviewed literature has discussed the surgical management of STS based on the site of origin. While the site of origin remains an important consideration, it has become increasingly clear that surgery must also be tailored to specific sarcoma histology to more accurately reflect tumor biology and pattern of recurrence. All sarcoma operations, included retroperitoneal surgery, should be performed in specialized centres to ensure optimal outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stiller CA, Trama A, Serraino D et al (2013) RARECARE Working Group. Descriptive epidemiology of sarcomas in Europe: report from the RARECARE project. Eur J Cancer 49(3):684–695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Judson I (2013) Role of expert centres in the management of sarcomas open access, review article. Eur J Cancer Suppl 11(2):310–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Koulaxouzidis G, Schwarzkopf E, Bannasch H et al (2015) Is revisional surgery mandatory when an unexpected sarcoma diagnosis is made following primary surgery? World J Surg Oncol 13:306–316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gutierrez JC, Perez EA, Franceschi D et al (2007) Outcomes for soft-tissue sarcoma in 8249 cases from a large state cancer registry. J Surg Res 141:105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Randall RL, Bruckner JD, Papenhausen MD et al (2004) Errors in diagnosis and margin determination of soft-tissue sarcomas initially treated at non-tertiary centers. Orthopedics 27(2):209–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gutierrez JC, Perez EA, Moffat FL et al (2007) Should soft tissue sarcomas be treated at high-volume centers? An analysis of 4205 patients. Ann Surg 245(6):952–958

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Eilber FR, Eckardt J (1997) Surgical management of soft tissue sarcomas. Semin Oncol 24(5):526–533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ray-Coquard I, Thiesse P, Ranchere-Vince D et al (2004) Conformity to clinical practice guidelines, multidisciplinary management and outcome of treatment for soft tissue sarcomas. Ann Oncol 15:307–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhangu AA, Beard JA, Grimer RJ (2004) Should soft tissue sarcomas be treated at a specialist centre? Sarcoma 8:1–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stoeckle E, Italiano A, Stock N et al (2008) Surgical margins in soft tissue sarcoma. Bull Cancer 95(12):1199–1204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gronchi A, Miceli R, Allard MA et al (2015) Personalizing the approach to retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: histology-specific patterns of failure and postrelapse outcome after primary extended resection. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1447–1454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raut CP, Gronchi A (2014) The management of soft tissue sarcoma. In: Cameron JL, Cameron AM (eds) Current Surgical Therapy. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 706–717

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gronchi A, Dei Tos AP, Casali PG (2016) Sarcomas of Soft Tissue and Bone. In: Kerr DJ, Haller DG, van de Velde CJH, Baumann M (eds.) Oxford Textbook of Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, p 844–866

  14. Rare Cancers Network Europe (2016) http://www.rarecarenet.eu/rarecarenet/. Accessed March 2016

  15. ESMO/European Sarcoma Network Working Group (2012) Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 7):92–99 (vii)

    Google Scholar 

  16. NICE guidelines (2016) http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CSG). Accessed March 2016

  17. The Sarcoma Alliance (2016) http://sarcomaalliance.org/sarcoma-centers. Accessed March 2016

  18. Qureshi YA, Huddy JR, Miller JD et al (2012) Unplanned excision of soft tissue sarcoma results in increased rates of local recurrence despite full further oncological treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 19:871–877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bonvalot S, Raut CP, Pollock RE et al (2012) Technical considerations in surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas: position paper from E-Surge, a master class in sarcoma surgery, and EORTC-STBSG. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2981–2991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Sandrucci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Although for this type of study formal consent is not required, informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sandrucci, S., Trama, A., Quagliuolo, V. et al. Accreditation for centers of sarcoma surgery. Updates Surg 69, 1–7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0382-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-016-0382-z

Keywords

Navigation