Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prognostic risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard technique for the treatment of gallbladder disease. However, in some cases, conversion to open surgery is still necessary. Identification of patients with high risk of conversion is of great importance to prepare the surgical scenario and to anticipate the convalescence. The objective of this study is to identify the factors that may predict a conversion to an open procedure. A total of 1386 LC were performed in Dr. Manuel Gea González General Hospital, from January 2009 to May 2013. A retrospective analysis of 41 parameters in these patients was performed, including demographic variables, clinical history, laboratory studies, ultrasound results and intraoperative findings. Subsequently, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictive variables for conversion. Fourteen patients required conversion (1%). The multivariate analysis revealed that the factor that was most associated with conversion was emergency surgery (OR 4.9, CI 95% 2.3–2.4), as well as dilatation > 6 mm of the common bile duct in ultrasound (OR 1.8, CI 95% 1.1–1.7), hepatomegaly (OR 1.3, CI 95% 0.3–4.9), diagnosis of chronic cholecystitis associated to previous biliary colics (OR 2.8, CI 95% 1.0–21) and elevated alanine aminotransaminase (OR 1.2, CI 95% 1.0–2.1). Patients with acute symptoms, with dilatation of the bile duct, cholestasis history and hepatomegaly have a higher risk of a conversion surgery. These factors may warn both the patient and the surgeon for a complex surgery and possible complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keus F, de Jong J, Gooszen HG, Laarhoven CJ (2006) Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006231

    Google Scholar 

  2. Livingston EH, Rege RV (2004) A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 188:205–211. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bingener-Casey J, Richards ML, Strodel WE et al (2002) Reasons for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a 10-year review. J Gastrointest Surg 6(6):800–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanaan SA, Murayama KM, Merriam LT et al (2002) Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. J Surg Res 106:20–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Steeg HJJ, Alexander S, Houterman S et al (2011) Risk factors for conversion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy—experiences from a general teaching hospital. Scand J Surg 100:169–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kama NA, Kologlu M, Doganay M et al (2001) A risk score for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 181:520–525. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00633-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Uecker J, Adams M, Skipper K, Dunn E (2001) Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach? Am Surg 67:637–640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, De Palma G et al (1995) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients compared with nonobese patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 5:197–201

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ammori BJ, Vezakis A, Davides D et al (2001) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in morbidly obese patients. Surg Endosc 15:1336–1339. doi:10.1007/s004640000019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Karayiannakis AJ, Polychronidis A, Perente S et al (2004) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 18:97–101. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-9001-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diez J, Delbene R, Ferreres A (1998) The feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous abdominal surgery. HPB Surg 10:353–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosen M, Brody F, Ponsky J (2002) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 184:254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schäfer M, Krähenbühl L, Büchler MW (2001) Predictive factors for the type of surgery in acute cholecystitis. Am J Surg 182:291–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alponat A, Kum CK, Koh BC et al (1997) Predictive factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Surg 21(6):629–633

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Leary DP, Myers E, Waldron D, Coffey JC (2013) Beware the contracted gallbladder—ultrasonic predictors of conversion. Surgeon 11:187–190. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2012.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Poggio JL, Rowland CM, Gores GJ et al (2000) A comparison of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy in patients with compensated cirrhosis and symptomatic gallstone disease. Surgery 127:405–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clark JR, Wills VL, Hunt DR (2001) Cirrhosis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:165–169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tate JJ, Lau WY, Li AK (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary pancreatitis. Br J Surg 81:720–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Makridis C (2010) Laparoscopic treatment of Mirizzi syndrome: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 24:33–39. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0520-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wysocki A, Bobrzynski A, Krzywon J, Budzynski A (1999) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gallbladder cancer. Surg Endosc 13:899–901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cagir B, Rangraj M, Maffuci L, Herz BL (1994) The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 4:419–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MacFadyen BV, Vecchio R, Ricardo AE, Mathis CR (1998) Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The United States experience. Surg Endosc 12:315–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Meyers WC (1991) A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med 324:1073–1078. doi:10.1056/NEJM199104183241601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sain AH (1996) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the current “gold standard” for the treatment of gallstone disease. Ann Surg 224:689–690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lengyel BI, Panizales MT, Steinberg J et al (2012) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: what is the price of conversion? Surgery (United States) 152:173–178. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2012.02.016

    Google Scholar 

  26. Le VH, Smith DE, Johnson BL (2012) Conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy in the current era of laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg 78:1392–1395. doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2003.08.005

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yajima H, Kanai H, Son K et al (2014) Reasons and risk factors for intraoperative conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Surg Today 44:80–83. doi:10.1007/s00595-012-0465-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu CL, Fan ST, Lai EC et al (1996) Factors affecting conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery. Arch Surg 131:98–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang TF, Guo L, Wang Q (2014) Evaluation of preoperative risk factor for converting laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 61:958–965

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ho HS, Mathiesen KA, Wolfe BM (1996) The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the treatment of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Surg Endosc 10:746–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hutchinson CH, Traverso LW, Lee FT (1994) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Do preoperative factors predict the need to convert to open? Surg Endosc 8:875–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sakpal SV, Bindra SS, Chamberlain RS (2010) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy conversion rates two decades later. JSLS 14:476–483. doi:10.4293/108680810X12924466008240

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Tiong L, Oh J (2015) Safety and efficacy of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the morbid and super obese patients. HPB 17:600–604. doi:10.1111/hpb.12415

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Endoscopic Surgery Department, Hospital General “Dr. Manuel Gea González”, Calzada de Tlalpan 4800, Tlalpan, PO Box 14000, Mexico City, Mexico

    Karla V. Chávez, Itzé Aguirre & Juan C. Orellana

  2. Congenital Heart Disease Department, Hospital de Cardiología Centro Médico Nacional “Siglo XXI”, Mexico City, Mexico

    Horacio Márquez-González

Authors
  1. Karla V. Chávez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Horacio Márquez-González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Itzé Aguirre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Juan C. Orellana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karla V. Chávez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the participants of our study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent was not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chávez, K.V., Márquez-González, H., Aguirre, I. et al. Prognostic risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Updates Surg 70, 67–72 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0494-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0494-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation