Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Embodying the path of sustainability: reflections on “learning to juggle” in environmental pedagogy

  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We often use juggling as an everyday metaphor for balancing multiple interests, which pertains to thinking about sustainability, yet to date its potential for environmental pedagogy has not been evaluated. Here, I provide some lessons learned while teaching students to juggle as part of a senior environmental studies course at the University of Waterloo over a 4-year period (2009–2012, n = 289 students). I begin by briefly reviewing four benefits of teaching environmental studies students how to juggle: (1) it embodies system thinking, (2) it grounds environmental metaphors, (3) it helps to transcend paradigms, and (4) it promotes well-being. I then provide preliminary support for these claims from a survey of my students in 2012. With these lessons and some caveats in mind, I conclude that learning to juggle is a wonderful embodied metaphor for nurturing students’ reflections about sustainability, so I encourage other environmental studies educators to consider it within their courses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I use the term juggling here in its most common everyday meaning of “toss juggling,” that is, keeping several objects (or props, whether balls, beanbags, rings, or chainsaws) in the air while tossing them back and forth (see www.wikipedia.com). People learn to juggle most easily if they progress through a sequence of foundational, easier steps with one and then two objects before adding a third to attain the “3-object cascade” (further details upon request, though some sources for learning how to juggle include Finnigan 1987; Gelb and Buzan 1994, and www.juggling.org).

  2. I administered a brief survey to my students after the fourth time I taught the course, in April 2012. The survey was informal in that students were not compelled to complete it (e.g., with incentives), in accord with approval granted by the Office of Research Ethics at the University of Waterloo (ORE no. 18008). The response rate was thus about 55 % (60/110 students), and although this rate raises questions about non-response bias, it must be interpreted in the context of the general decline in response rates in recent years.

References

  • Bebko JM, Demark JL, Osborn PA, Majumder S, Ricciuti CJ, Rhee T (2003) Acquisition and automatization of a complex task: an examination of three-ball cascade juggling. J Motor Behav 35:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draganski B, Gaser C, Busch V, Schuierer G, Bogdahn U, May A (2004) Neuroplasticity: changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 427:311–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan D (1987) The complete juggler. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster J (2005) Making sense of stewardship: metaphorical thinking and the environment. Environ Educ Res 11:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromm E (1976) To have or to be? Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb MJ, Buzan T (1994) Lessons from the art of juggling: how to achieve your full potential in business, learning, and life. Harmony Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs RW, Lima PLC, Francozo E (2004) Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. J Pragmatics 36:1189–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson RB (2006) Beyond the pillars: sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision making. J Environ Assess Policy Manage 8:259–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guendelman S, Kosa JL, Pearl M et al (2009) Juggling work and breastfeeding: effects of maternity leave and occupational characteristics. Pediatrics 123:E38–E46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huys R, Daffertshofer A, Beek PJ (2004) Multiple time scales and multiform dynamics in learning to juggle. Mot Control 8:188–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison R (2010) Systems practice: how to act in a climate-change world. Springer and Open University, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jang SJ, Zippay A (2011) The juggling act: managing work-life conflict and work-life balance. Fam Soc 92:84–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen P, Titze C, Heil M (2009) The influence of juggling on mental rotation performance. Int J Sport Psychol 40:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson B (2011) Metaphors for environmental sustainability: redefining our relationship with nature. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge DM, Hamlin C (eds) (2006) Religion and the new ecology: environmental responsibility in a world in flux. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus T, Shellenberger M, Blomqvist L (2012) The planetary boundaries hypothesis: a review of the evidence. Breakthrough Institute, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard RB (2010) Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol Econ 69:1219–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Princen T (2010) Treading softly: paths to ecological order. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross N, Eyles J, Cole D, Iannantuono A (1997) The ecosystem health metaphor in science and policy. Can Geogr 41:114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin K, Tippins DJ (1996) Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science teaching. Sci Educ 80:711–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Salt D (2006) Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendon M. H. Larson.

Appendix: survey instrument

Appendix: survey instrument

Sex (circle one):

Female

Male

I knew how to juggle three balls at the beginning of the course.

YES

NO

I now know how to juggle three balls.

YES

NO

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements concerning the juggling assignment in this course:

Statement

Strongly disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly agree

1. The assignment did not really provide me with any insights about sustainability.

1

2

3

4

5

2. I feel more confident as a result of the assignment.

1

2

3

4

5

3. I feel that the assignment was an effective way to ground the environmental metaphors discussed in the course.

1

2

3

4

5

4. When the course began, I thought the assignment would be a waste of time.

1

2

3

4

5

5. I found juggling to be relaxing and even meditative.

1

2

3

4

5

6. In the end, the assignment was valuable for me.

1

2

3

4

5

7. I thought that learning to juggle was an apt metaphor for seeking sustainability.

1

2

3

4

5

8. I valued juggling as an experiential exercise.

1

2

3

4

5

9. The assignment taught me about myself.

1

2

3

4

5

10. This assignment provided insights into how I relate to time.

1

2

3

4

5

11. I enjoyed this assignment as a fun, final challenge to my degree.

1

2

3

4

5

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Larson, B.M.H. Embodying the path of sustainability: reflections on “learning to juggle” in environmental pedagogy. J Environ Stud Sci 6, 706–711 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0246-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-015-0246-8

Keywords

Navigation