Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of potential soil adsorbent for the removal of hazardous metals from aqueous phase

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study attempted to identify the efficient hazardous metal-removing sorbent from specific types of soil, upper and middle layer shirasu, shell fossil, tuff, akadama and kanuma soils of Japan by physico-chemical and metal (arsenic, cadmium and lead) removal characterizations. The physico-chemical characteristics of soil were evaluated using X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy techniques, whereas metal removal properties of soil were characterized by analyzing removal capacity and sorption kinetics of potential metal-removing soils. The chemical characteristics revealed that all soils are prevalently constituted of silicon dioxide (21.83–78.58 %), aluminum oxide (4.13–38 %) and ferrous oxide (0.835–7.7 %), whereas calcium oxide showed the highest percentage (65.36 %) followed by silicon dioxide (21.83 %) in tuff soil. The results demonstrated that arsenic removal efficiency was higher in elevated aluminum oxide-containing akadama (0.00452 mg/L/g/h) and kanuma (0.00225 mg/L/g/h) soils, whereas cadmium (0.00634 mg/L/g/h) and lead (0.00693 mg/L/g/h) removal efficiencies were maximum in elevated calcium oxide-containing tuff soil. Physico-chemical sorption and ion exchange processes are the metal removal mechanisms. The critical appraisal of three metal removal data also clearly revealed cadmium > lead > arsenic order of removal efficiency in different soils, except in tuff and akadama soils followed by lead > cadmium > arsenic. It clearly signified that each type of soil had a specific metal adsorption affinity which was regulated by the specific chemical composition. It may be concluded that akadama would be potential arsenic-removing and tuff would be efficient cadmium and lead-removing soil sorbents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A, Sahu KK (2006) Kinetic and isotherm studies of cadmium adsorption on manganese nodule reside. J Haz Mat B137:915–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksu Z (2005) Application of biosorption for the removal of organic pollutants: a review. Process Biochem 40:997–1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey SE, Olin TJ, Brica RM, Adrin DD (1999) A review of the potential low cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res 33:2469–2479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barer RM (1987) Zeolites and clay minerals as sorbent and molecular sieves. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron-Zambrano J, Laborie S, Vier Ph, Rakib M, Durand G (2002) Mercury removal from aqueous solutions by complexation—ultrafiltration. Desalination 144:201–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benguella B, Benaissa H (2002) Cadmium removal from aqueous solutions by chitin: kinetics and equilibrium studies. Water Res 36:2463–2474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhakta JN, Munekage Y (2008) Role of ecosystem components in Cd removal process of aquatic ecosystem. Ecol Eng 32:274–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhakta JN, Munekage Y (2009) Ceramic as a potential tool for water reclamation: a consize review. J Environ Prot Sci 3:147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Breck DW (1964) Crystalline molecular sieves. J Chem Ed 41:678

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell PGC (2006) Cadmium—a priority pollutant. Environ Chem 3:387–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerino Córdova FJ, García León AM, Garcia Reyes RB, Garza González MT, Soto Regalado E, Sánchez González MN, Quezada Lopez I (2011) Response surface methodology for lead biosorption on Aspergillus terreus. Int J Environ Sci Tech 8:695–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JP, Wang X (2000) Removing copper, zinc and lead ion by granular activated carbon in pretreated fixed-bed columns. Separ Purif Tech 19:157–167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TY, Kao CM, Yeh TY, Chien HY, Chao AC (2006) Application of a constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment: a pilot-scale study. Chemosphere 64:497–502

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury H, Mudipalli A (2008) Potential considerations and concerns in the risk characterization for the interaction profiles of metals. Indian J Med Res 128:462–483

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Jana BB (1999) Dose-dependent uptake and Eichhornia-induced elimination of cadmium in various organs of the freshwater mussel, Lamellidens marginalis (Linn.). Ecol Eng 12:207–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2000/60/EC (2000) Water Framework Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 Oct 2000

  • Doyurum S, Celik A (2006) Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal from aqueous solution by olive cake. J Haz Mat B138:22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdem E, Karapinar N, Donat R (2004) The removal of heavy metal cations by natural zeolites. J Coll Interf Sci 280:309–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferard JF, Jouany JM, Truhaut R, Vasseur P (1983) Accumulation of cadmium in a freshwater food chain experimental model. Ecotox Environ Saf 7:43–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gabaldon C, Marzal P, Alvarez-Hornos FJ (2006) Modelling Cd(II) removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on a highly mineralized peat, batch and fixed-bed column experiments. J Chem Tech Biotech 81:1107–1112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis AA, Miller DR (2000) Some local environmental effects on mercury emission and adsorption at a soil surface. Sci Total Environ 260:191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA, Gomez AA (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. International Rice Research Institute, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulledge JH, O’Connor JT (1973) Removal of As(V) from water by adsorption on aluminium and ferric hydroxide. J Am Water Works Assoc 65:548–552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan S, Krishnaiah S, Ghosh TK, Viswanath DS, Boddu VM (2006) Adsorption of divalent cadmium Cd(II) from aqueous solutions onto chitosan-coated pertite beads. Indust Eng Chem Res 45:5066–5077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hemond HF, Solo-Gabriele HM (2004) Children’s exposure to arsenic from CCA-treated wooden decks and playground structures. Risk Anal 24:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holan ZR, Volesky B, Prasetyo I (1993) Biosorption of cadmium by biomass of marine algae. Biotech Bioeng 41:819–825

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunsom M, Pruksathorn K, Damronglerd S, Vergnes H, Duverneuil P (2005) Electrochemical treatment of heavy metals (Cu2+, Cr6+, Ni2+) from industrial effluent and modeling of copper reduction. Water Res 39:610–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • International Occupational Safety and Health Information Centre (1999) Metals in basics of chemical safety, Chapter 7. International Labour Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jana BB, Das S (1997) Potential of freshwater mussel (Lamellidens marginalis) for cadmium clearance in a model system. Ecol Eng 8:179–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong Y, Maohong F, Singh S, Chuang C-L, Saha B, Hans VLJ (2007) Evaluation of iron oxide and aluminum oxide as potential arsenic(V) adsorbents. Chem Eng Process 46:1030–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones BF, Galan E (1988) Sepiolite and palygorskite. In: Bailey SW (ed) Reviews in Mineralogy. Hydrous Phyllosilicates, vol 19. Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, pp 631–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusoh A, Shiung LS, Ali N, Noor MJMM (2007) A simulation study of the removal efficiency of granular activated carbon on cadmium and lead. Desalination 206:9–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kentish SE, Stevens GW (2001) Innovations in separations technology for the recycling and re-use of liquid waste streams. Chem Eng J 84:149–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvil D, Volesky D (1998) Advances in the biosorption of heavy metals. Tybtech 16:291–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy BL, Toole AP, Bergstrom PD (1989) Health risk assessment for arsenic contaminated soil. Environ Geochem Heal 11:163–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadeem M, Nadeem R, Nadem HU, Shah SS (2005) Accumulation of lead and cadmium in different organs of chicken. Pak J Sci Res 57:71–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nouri L, Ghodbane I, Hamdaoui O, Chiha M (2007) Batch sorption dynamics and equilibrium for the removal of cadmium ions from aqueous phase using wheat bran. J Haz Mat 149:115–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara MJ, Surgi MR (1988) Immobilization of lead and cadmium in solid residues from the combustion of refuse using lime and phosphate. Unite state patent, Patent number 4737356

  • Onundi YB, Mamun AA, Al Khatib MF, AlSaadi MA, Suleyman AM (2011) Heavy metals removal from synthetic wastewater by a novel nano-size composite adsorbent. Int J Environ Sci Tech 8:799–806

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco S, Tapia J, Medina M, Rodriguez R (2006) Cadmium ions adsorption in simulated wastewater using structured alumina–silica nanoparticles. J Non-Cryst Solid 352:5475–5481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterlene WS, Winkler-Hechenleitner AA, Pineda EAG (1999) Adsorption of Cd(II) and Pb(II) onto functionalized formic lignin from sugarcane bagasse. Biores Tech 68:95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JR (1999) Metal toxicity in children. In: training manual on pediatric environmental health: putting it into practice. Emeryville, CA, Children’s Environmental Health Network. http://www.cehn.org/cehn/trainingmanual/(pdf/manual-full.pdf)

  • Robertson FN (1989) Arsenic in ground-water under oxidizing conditions, south-west United States. Environ Geochem Heal 11:171–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rozada F, Otero M, Moran A, Garcia AI (2008) Adsorption of heavy metals onto sewage sludge-derived materials. Biores Technol 99:6332–6338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stumm W (1992) Chemistry of the Solid - Water Interface. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashauoei HR, Movahedian Attar H, Amin MM, Kamali M, Nikaeen M, Vahid Dastjerdi M (2010) Removal of cadmium and humic acid from aqueous solutions using surface modified nanozeolite A. Int J Environ Sc Tech 7:497–508

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zavvar Mousavi H, Seyedi SR (2011) Nettle ash as a low cost adsorbent for the removal of Nickel and Cadmium from wastewater. Int J Environ Sci Tech 8:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng L (2003) A method for preparing silica-containing iron(III) oxide adsorbents for arsenic removal. Water Res 37:4351–4358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Government of Japan for sponsoring the JSPS research grant (No. 20380181) to carry out the present study. The authors express their sincere thanks to K. Fuyukawa for helping in the collection of soil samples used in the experiment and to Dr. Yuhji Yamamoto for extending his kind cooperation in the XRD and SEM–EDS analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. N. Bhakta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhakta, J.N., Munekage, Y. Identification of potential soil adsorbent for the removal of hazardous metals from aqueous phase. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10, 315–324 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0116-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0116-9

Keywords

Navigation