Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An improved semiautomatic segmentation approach to land cover mapping for identification of land cover change and trend

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Worldwide, land cover change is monitored by conventional land cover mapping techniques using satellite imagery. Index method ends with assigning positive values to indicate vegetation, wetland and built-up area. However, not all positive values up to a certain threshold specify desired land cover and might indicate other covers erroneously. Therefore, a threshold value must be determined above which land covers are mapped more accurately. In this research, we employed an improved land cover mapping technique to extract vegetation, wetland and built-up area using semiautomatic segmentation approach. We used double-window flexible pace search technique not only for built-up features but also for vegetation and wetland mapping to increase the accuracy. Study is based on Landsat Thematic Mapper images of 1989, 1999 and 2010 with spatial resolution of 30 m. Integration of simple recoding of derived index images prior to threshold identification entails increased accuracy. Accuracy assessment of land cover mapping is done using high-resolution Google Earth satellite image which substitutes expensive aerial photography and time-consuming ground data collection. Error matrix presents 82.46, 96.83 and 90 % user’s accuracy of mapping built-up area, vegetation and wetland, respectively. Trend analysis discloses an average loss of vegetation and wetland by 2,664.6 and 5,328.8 acres per year, respectively, in study area from 1989 to 2010. Expectantly, future land cover mapping in similar researches will be greatly assisted with the diligent technique used in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JR, Hardy EE, Roach JT, Witmer RE (1976) A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. United States Government Printing Office, Washington [online]. http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/anderson.pdf

  • Bhatta B (2009) Analysis of urban growth pattern using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Kolkata, India. Int J Remote Sens 30:4733–4746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell WG, Mortenson DC (1989) Ensuring the quality of geographic information system data: a practical application of quality control. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 55:1613–1618

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Gong P, He C, Pu R, Shi P (2003) Land-use/land-cover change detection using improved change-vector analysis. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69(4):369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleve C, Kelly M, Kearns F, Moritz M (2008) Classification of the wildland–urban interface: a comparison of pixel- and object-based classifications using high-resolution aerial photography. Comput Environ Urban Syst 32:317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG (1991) A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens Environ 37(1):35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG, Green K (1999) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities (2001) Manual of concepts on land cover and land use information systems. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg [online]. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/statmanuals/files/KS-34-00-407-__-I-EN.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2013

  • Firl GJ (2010) Lesson 8: mosaicking and clipping landsat data. Tutorial conducted from Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States [online]. http://ibis.colostate.edu/WebContent/WS/ColoradoView/TutorialsDownloads/CO_RS_Tutorial8.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2012

  • Griffiths P, Hostert P, Gruebner O, Van Derlinden S (2010) Mapping megacity growth with multi-sensor data. Remote Sens Environ 114:426–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guindon B, Zhang Y, Dillabaugh C (2004) Landsat urban mapping based on a combined spectral–spatial methodology. Remote Sens Environ 92:218–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He C, Shi P, Xie D, Zhao Y (2010) Improving the normalized difference built-up index to map urban built-up areas using a semiautomatic segmentation approach. Remote Sens Lett 1(4):213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete AR (1988) A Soil-adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ 25(3):295–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IRIN (2012) Bangladesh: Dhaka’s shrinking wetlands raise disaster risks. Humanitarian news and analysis. IRIN News [online]. http://www.irinnews.org/Report/95671/BANGLADESH-Dhaka-s-shrinking-wetlands-raise-disaster-risks. Accessed 21 June 2012

  • Janssen LLF, Vander Wel FJM (1994) Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: a review. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 60:419–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR (2000) Remote sensing of the environment: an earth resource perspective. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 544

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta RS, Ediriwickrema J, Johnson DM, Lyon JG, McKerrow A (2002) Impacts of vegetation dynamics on the identification of land-cover change in a biologically complex community in North Carolina, USA. Remote Sens Environ 82:258–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maling DH (1989) Measurements from maps—principles and methods of cartometry. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller SV, Walker DA, Nelson FE, Auerbach NA, Bockheim JG, Guyer S, Sherba D (1998) Accuracy assessment of a land-cover map of the Kuparuk River Basin, Alaska: considerations for remote regions. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 64(6):619–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Priyodesk (2011) Move to protect arable land now in cold storage. Priyo News [online]. http://news.priyo.com/politics/2011/10/08/move-protect-arable-land-now-c-39572.html. Accessed 9 Nov 2012

  • Rogan J, Chen DM (2004) Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring land-cover and land-use change. Prog Plan 61:301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossiter DG (2004) Technical note: statistical methods for accuracy assessment of classified thematic maps [online]. http://www.itc.nl/~rossiter/teach/R/R_ac.pdf. Accessed 9 Jan 2013

  • Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1974) Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. In: Proceedings of the Third ERTS-1 Symposium, NASA Goddard, NASA SP-351, pp. 309–317

  • Sanderson (2000) Introduction to remote sensing. New Mexico Space Grant Consortium [online]. http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/crp/bramadan/crp514/readings/%20Introd_Remote_Sensing_Dr_Sanderson_New_Mexico_State_Univ_38Pages.pdf

  • Shubho MTH, Hassan MT, Hossain MR, Neema MN (2013) Quantitative analysis of spatial pattern of dustbins and its pollution in Dhaka City—a GIS based approach. Asian Trans Eng 3(4):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Smits PC, Dellepiane SG, Schowengerdt RA (1999) Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: a review and proposal for a cost-based approach. Int J Remote Sens 20:1461–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Story M, Congalton R (1986) Accuracy assessment: a user’s perspective. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 52(3):397–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Skole DL, Sanderson S, Fisher G, Fresco LO, Leemans R (1995) Land-use and land-cover change. Science/Research Plan. Stockholm and Geneva: IGBP Report No. 35 and HDP Report No. 7

  • Wardad Y (2012) Enactment of agriculture land protection act underscored. The Financial Express [online]. http://www.thefinancialexpress-bd.com/more.php?date=2012-01-15&news_id=93985. Accessed 7 June 2012

  • Xu H (2005) A study on information extraction of water body with the Modified Normalized Difference Water Index (MNDWI). J Remote Sens 9(5):511–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu H (2007) Extraction of urban built-up land features from landsat imagery using a thematic-oriented index combination technique. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 72(12):1381–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H (2008) A new index for delineating built-up land features in satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens 29:4269–4276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan F, Bauer ME, Heinert NJ, Holden GR (2005) Multi-level land cover mapping of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) metropolitan area with multi-seasonal lands at TM/ETM+ data. Geocarto Inte 20(2):5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zha Y, Gao J, Ni S (2003) Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int J Remote Sens 24(3):583–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Pavlic G, Chen W, Fraser R, Leblanc S, Cihlar J (2005) A Semi-automatic segmentation procedure for feature extraction in remotely sensed imagery. Comput Geosci 31:289–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to the department of Urban and Regional Planning of the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology for providing necessary logistic supports to conduct this research. We are also grateful to the site GLCF: Earth Science Data Interface for access to their data. We also acknowledge the use of data provided by the Bangladesh Space Research and Remote Sensing Organization (SPARRSO).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. T. H. Shubho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shubho, M.T.H., Islam, S.R., Ayon, B.D. et al. An improved semiautomatic segmentation approach to land cover mapping for identification of land cover change and trend. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 2593–2602 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0649-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0649-1

Keywords

Navigation