Abstract
Municipal wastewater sludge has been used for fertiliser and biogas production for several decades. Chemical compounds such as iron and aluminium are common coagulants used in wastewater treatment plants to remove suspended solids, phosphorus and micro-organisms. This laboratory study explores whether ferric chloride (FeCl3 as PIX-111) or aluminium chloride (AlCl3 as PAX-18) flocculation could stimulate biogas production in wastewater sludge contaminated with Microthrix parvicella. In a fermentation process run in three replicates, cumulative methane production was in average about 25 % higher using the iron flocculated sludge than using the aluminium flocculated sludge; this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05) in the subsequent runs of the semi-continuous process. In all runs, the iron flocculated sludge produced less (P < 0.05) hydrogen sulphide in the biogas than the aluminium flocculated sludge. The numbers of M. parvicella stayed at the similar levels throughout the process. It is concluded that biogas production is higher and more stable with iron coagulant in comparison with aluminium coagulant, presumably due to the reduced formation of hydrogen sulphide. Thus, iron coagulants seem to be better than aluminium coagulants to stimulate the methane production process. Both coagulants significantly suppressed multiplication of M. parvicella in the biogas reactor, i.e. they did not evoke foaming in this experiment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Public Health Association (APHA) (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. APHA, Washington DC
Cabirol N, Barragán EJ, Durán A, Noyola A (2003) Effect of aluminum and sulphate on anaerobic digestion of sludge from waste water enhanced primary treatment. Water Sci Technol 48(6):235–240
Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS (2008) Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol 99:4044–4064
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (1979) A ready-reference book of chemical and physical data, 60th edn. Robert C. Weast. The Chemical Rubber Co., CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida
Dewil R, Baeyens J, Roels J, Van De Steene B (2008) Distribution of sulphur compounds in sewage sludge treatment. Environ Eng Sci 25:879–886
DeWolfe J, Dempsey B, Taylor M, Potter JW (2003) Guidance manual for coagulant change over. American Water Works Association Press, Denver, pp 5–6
Eikelboom DH, van Buijsen MSS (1983) Microscopic sludge investigation manual. TNO Research Institute, Delft
Eikelboom DH, Andreadakis A, Andreasen K (1998) Survey of the filamentous population in nutrient removal plants in four European countries. Water Sci Technol 37(4–5):281–289
Ge H, Zhang LS, Batstone DJ, Keller J, Yuan ZG (2013) Impact of iron salt dosage to sewers on downstream anaerobic sludge digesters: sulfide control and methane production. J Environ Eng 139:594–601
Glass JB, Orphan VJ (2012) Trace metal requirements for microbial enzymes involved in the production and consumption of methane and nitrous oxide. Front Microbiol 3(61):1–20
Hutnan M, Drtil M, Kalina A (2006) Anaerobic stabilisation of sludge produced during municipal wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater 131:163–169
ISO (1871) 1975 Agricultural food products; general directions for the determination of nitrogen by the Kjeldahl method
Jenkins D, Richard MG, Daigger GT (2005) Manual on the causes and control of activated sludge bulking foaming, and other solids separation problems, 3rd edn. Lewis Publishers, Washington DC
Johnson DK, Carliell-Marquet CM, Forster CF (2003) An examination of the treatment of iron-dosed waste activated sludge by anaerobic digestion. Environ Technol 24:937–945
Kaetzke A, Entsch D, Escherichia K (2005) Quantification of Microthrix parvicella in activated sludge bacterial communities by real-time PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol 40:207–211
Koster IW, Rinzema A, de Vegt AL, Lettinga G (1986) Sulfide inhibition of the methanogenic activity of granular sludge at different pH levels. Water Res 20:1561–1567
Lee H (2008) Stimulation of anaerobic digestion of thickened sewage sludge by iron-rich sludge produced by the Fenton method. J Biosci Bioeng 106:107–110
Mamais D, Kalaitzi E, Andreadakis A (2011) Foaming control in activated sludge treatment plants by coagulants addition. Global Nest J 13:237–245
Marneri M, Mamais D, Koutsiouki E (2009) Microthrix parvicella and Gordona amarae in mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion systems. Environ Technol 30(5):437–444
Martins AMP, Pagilla K, Heijnen JJ, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2004) Filamentous bulking sludge—a critical review. Water Res 38:793–817
Morse GK, Brett SW, Guy JA, Lester JN (1998) Review: phosphorus removal and recovery technologies. Sci Total Environ 212:69–81
Nielsen PH, Kragelund C, Nielsen JL, Tiro S, Lebek M, Rosenwinkel KH, Gessesse A (2005) Control of Microthrix parvicella in activated sludge plants by dosage of polyaluminium salts: possible mechanisms. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 33:255–261
Noutsopoulos C, Andreadakis A, Mamais D, Gavalakis E (2007) Identification of type and causes of filamentous bulking under Mediterranean conditions. Environ Technol 28:115–122
Park C, Novak JT (2007) Characterization of activated sludge exocellular polymers using several cation-associated extraction methods. Water Res 41:1679–1688
Postgate JR (1979) The sulphate-reducing bacteria, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE (1985) A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:1–7
Rosseland BO, Eldhuset TD, Staurnes M (1990) Environmental effects of aluminium. Environ Geochem Health 12(1–2):17–27
Rossetti S, Christensson C, Blackall LL, Tandoi V (1997) Phenotypic and phylogenetic description of an Italian isolate of “Microthrix parvicella”. J Appl Microbiol 82:405–410
Rossetti S, Tomei MC, Nielsen PH, Tandoi V (2005) “Microthrix parvicella’’, a filamentous bacterium causing bulking and foaming in activated sludge systems: a review of current knowledge. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:49–64
Sato K, Ochi S, Mizuochi M (2001) Up-to date modification of the anaerobic sludge digestion process introducing a separate sludge digestion mode. Water Sci Technol 44(10):143–147
SFS-EN (2000) 13346. Characterization of sludges. Determination of trace elements and phosphorus. Aqua regia extraction methods
Speece R (2001) Anaerobic biotechnology for industrial wastewaters. Archae Press, Nashville
Tandoi V, Rossetti S, Blackall LL, Majone M (1998) Some physiological properties of an Italian isolate of Microthrix parvicella. Water Sci Technol 37(4–5):1–9
Westlund AD, Hagland E, Rothman M (1998) Foaming in anaerobic digesters caused by Microthrix parvicella. Water Sci Technol 37(4–5):51–55
WHO (2003) Hydrogen sulphide: human health aspects. Prepared by Dr. C.-H. Selene J. Chou. http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/cicad/en/cicad53.pdf
Yang Z, Gao B, Yue Q (2010) Coagulation performance and residual aluminum speciation of Al2(SO4)3 and polyaluminum chloride (PAC) in Yellow River water treatment. Chem Eng J 165:122–132
Zhang HJ (2010) Sludge treatment to increase biogas production. Trita-LWR Degree project 10–20. http://www.sjostadsverket.se/download/18.79cc091012c369366d9800017089/1292253537712/LWR_EX_10_20.pdf
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Drs. V. Tandoi and S. Rossetti (CNR—Water Research Institute, Rome, Italy) for providing M. parvicella RN1 cells. We thank the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (Tekes) and European Regional Development Fund for financing the study as a Grant 70021/09. H. M. P. S. is acknowledging Kuopio University Foundation and Finnish Academy (No. 258875). We kindly thank Dr. Ewen MacDonald and Mr. Thor Windham-Wright for editing the English language.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pradhan, S.K., Torvinen, E., Siljanen, H.M.P. et al. Iron flocculation stimulates biogas production in Microthrix parvicella-spiked wastewater sludge. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 3039–3046 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0733-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0733-6