Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sorption of surfactants and personal care products in Indian soils

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sorption of three surfactants and personal care products in four types of commonly occurring Indian soils was extensively studied. The soils used in the study were red soil, clay soil, compost soil and sandy soil as classified by American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). The three surfactants used in the study were representative of cationic, non-ionic and anionic surfactant groups. The sorption of surfactants followed the descending order: sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) > trimethyl amine (TMA) > propylene glycol (PG). The maximum adsorption capacity (Qmax) was obtained in compost soil (28.6 mg/g for SDS; 9.4 mg/g for TMA and 4 mg/g for PG). The rate of adsorption was the maximum in compost soil followed by clay and red soils, and minimum for sandy soils. It is found that the Freundlich model fits the isotherm data better than the Langmuir model. Freundlich coefficient (K f) increased as the organic content of soils increased. Desorption of target pollutants in tap water was 20–50% whereas acid desorbs 40–90% of target pollutants from soil matrix. It was also found that the adsorption and desorption were significantly affected by the presence of clay and organic matter. The results also indicate that surfactants and personal care products, especially TMA and PG, are highly mobile in sandy soil followed by red soil. Therefore, immobilization of target pollutants is most economical and effective in compost and clayey soils whereas for other type of soils the combination of physiochemical and biological process will be effective option for remediation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adak A, Pal A, Bandyopadhyay M (2005) Spectrophotometric determination of anionic surfactants in wastewater using acridine orange. Ind J Chem Technol 12(2):145–148

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aisien FA, Amenaghawon AN, Adinkwuye AI (2014) Batch study, equilibrium and kinetics of adsorption of naphthalene using waste tyre rubber granules. J Xenob 4(1):20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Degs YS, El-Barghouthi MI, El-Sheikh AH, Walker GM (2008) Effect of solution pH, ionic strength, and temperature on adsorption behavior of reactive dyes on activated carbon. Dyes Pigments 77(1):16–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atay NZ, Yenigün O, Asutay M (2002) Sorption of anionic surfactants SDS, AOT and cationic surfactant Hyamine 1622 on natural soils. Water Air Soil Pollut 136(1–4):55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azam MR, Tan IM, Ismail L, Mushtaq M, Nadeem M, Sagir M (2013) Static adsorption of anionic surfactant onto crushed Berea sandstone. J Petrol Explor Prod Technol 3(3):195–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair BD, Crago JP, Hedman CJ, Klaper RD (2013) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products found in the Great Lakes above concentrations of environmental concern. Chemosphere 93(9):2116–2123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno F, Curini R, Di Corcia A, Fochi I, Nazzari M, Samperi R (2002) Determination of surfactants and some of their metabolites in untreated and anaerobically digested sewage sludge by subcritical water extraction followed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol 36(19):4156–4161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao J, Guo H, Zhu HM, Jiang L, Yang H (2008) Effects of SOM, surfactant and pH on the sorption–desorption and mobility of prometryne in soils. Chemosphere 70(11):2127–2134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CT, Chen BY, Shiu IS, Jeng FT (2004) Biofiltration of trimethylamine-containing waste gas by entrapped mixed microbial cells. Chemosphere 55(5):751–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Mukherjee I, Paul BK, Ghosh S (2014) Physicochemical behaviors of cationic gemini surfactant (14-4-14) based micro-heterogeneous assemblies. Langmuir 30(42):12483–12493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farzadkia M, RezaeiKalantary R, Mousavi G, Jorfi S, Gholami M (2010) The effect of organic loading on propylene glycol removal using fixed bed activated sludge hybrid reactor. Chem Biochem Eng Q 24(2):227–234

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fox K, Holt M, Daniel M, Buckland H, Guymer I (2000) Removal of linear alkylbenzenesulfonate from a small Yorkshire stream: contribution to GREAT-ER project# 7. Sci Total Environ 251:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fytianos K, Pegiadou S, Raikos N, Eleftheriadis I, Tsoukali H (1997) Determination of non-ionic surfactants (polyethoxylated-nonylphenols) by HPLC in waste waters. Chemosphere 35(7):1423–1429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Delgado RA, Cotoruelo-Minguez LM, Rodriguez JJ (1992) Equilibrium study of single-solute adsorption of anionic surfactants with polymeric XAD resins. Sep Sci Technol 27(7):975–987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holt MS, Fox KK, Burford M, Daniel M, Buckland H (1998) UK monitoring study on the removal of linear alkylbenzenesulphonate in trickling filter type sewage treatment plants. Contribution to GREAT-ER project# 2. Sci Total Environ 210:255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S, Jeong HY (2015) Sorption of a nonionic surfactant Tween 80 by minerals and soils. J Hazard Mater 284:143–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna KR, Philip L (2008) Adsorption and desorption characteristics of lindane, carbofuran and methyl parathion on various Indian soils. J Hazard Mater 160(2):559–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Philip L (2006) Adsorption and desorption characteristics of hydrophobic pesticide endosulfan in four Indian soils. Chemosphere 62(7):1064–1077

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) (2016) PubChem compound database; CID = 1030, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/1030. Accessed 12 Feb 2016

  • Pavan PC, Crepaldi EL, Gomes GDA, Valim JB (1999) Adsorption of sodium dodecylsulfate on a hydrotalcite-like compound. Effect of temperature, pH and ionic strength. Colloids Surf A 154(3):399–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrović M, Gonzalez S, Barceló D (2003) Analysis and removal of emerging contaminants in wastewater and drinking water. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 22(10):685–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purakayastha PD, Pal A, Bandyopadhyay M (2005) Sorption kinetics of anionic surfactant on to waste tire rubber granules. Sep Purif Technol 46(3):129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin Q, Chen X, Zhuang J (2015) The fate and impact of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in agricultural soils irrigated with reclaimed water. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 45(13):1379–1408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramprasad C, Philip L (2016) Surfactants and personal care products removal in pilot scale horizontal and vertical flow constructed wetlands while treating greywater. Chem Eng J 284:458–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • RavalPriti V, Desai Hemangi H (2012) Removal of anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) from aqueous solution by using alumina. J Environ Res Dev 7(2A):851–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznik GO, Vishwanath P, Pynn MA, Sitnik JM, Todd JJ, Wu J, Smith TF (2010) Use of sustainable chemistry to produce an acyl amino acid surfactant. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86(5):1387–1397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Cruz MS, Sanchez-Martin MJ, Sanchez-Camazano M (2005) A comparative study of adsorption of an anionic and a non-ionic surfactant by soils based on physicochemical and mineralogical properties of soils. Chemosphere 61(1):56–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salager JL (2002) Surfactants types and uses. Fire p booket-E300-attaching aid in surfactant science and engineering in English. Merida Venezuela 2:1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Somasundaran P, Huang L (2000) Adsorption/aggregation of surfactants and their mixtures at solid–liquid interfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 88(1):179–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ullah H, Khan I (2015) Effects of sewage water irrigation of cabbage to soil geochemical properties and products safety in peri-urban Peshawar, Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess 187(3):1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support received from Ministry of Human Resources Development (MHRD), Government of India (GoI) for supporting this research activity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EWRE Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    C. Ramprasad & L. Philip

Authors
  1. C. Ramprasad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Philip
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Philip.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: J. Aravind.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramprasad, C., Philip, L. Sorption of surfactants and personal care products in Indian soils. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 14, 853–866 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1188-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1188-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation