Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Physical, Psychological and Emotional Benefits of Green Physical Activity: An Ecological Dynamics Perspective

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing evidence supports the multiple benefits to physical, psychological and emotional wellbeing of green physical activity, a topic of increasing interest in the past decade. Research has revealed a synergistic benefit of green physical activity, which includes all aspects of exercise and physical activity in the presence of nature. Our theoretical analysis suggests there are three distinct levels of engagement in green physical activity, with each level reported to have a positive effect on human behaviours. However, the extent to which each level of green physical activity benefits health and wellbeing is assumed to differ, requiring confirmation in future research. This elucidation of understanding is needed because previous literature has tended to focus on recording empirical evidence rather than developing a sound theoretical framework to understand green physical activity effects. Here we propose an ecological dynamics rationale to explain how and why green physical activity might influence health and wellbeing of different population groups. This framework suggests a number of unexplored, interacting constraints related to types of environment and population groups, which shape reported levels of benefit of green physical activity. Further analysis is needed to clarify the explicit relationship between green physical activity and health and wellbeing, including levels of engagement, types of environmental constraints, levels of physical activity, adventure effects, skill effects and sampling of different populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Pretty J, Griffin M, Sellens M, et al. Green exercise: complementary roles of nature, exercise and diet in physical and emotional well-being and implications for public health policy. CES occasional paper 2003-1, University of Essex. 2003.

  2. WHO. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Switzerland: WHO; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. WHO. Fact sheet: mental and neurological disorders. Fact sheet: The World Health Report. 2001.

  4. Nigg CR, Borrelli B, Maddock J, et al. A theory of physical activity maintenance. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:544–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sallis JF, Glanz K. The role of built environments in physical activity, eating and obesity in childhood. Future Child. 2006;16:89–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stokols D. Social ecology and behavioural medicine: implications for training, practice, and policy. Behav Med. 2000;26(3):129–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gladwell VF, Brown DK, Wood C, et al. The great outdoors: how a green exercise environment can benefit all. Extrem Physiol Med. 2013;2:3. http://www.extremephysiolmed.com/content/2/1/3. Accessed 3 Jan 2013.

  8. Coon JT, Boddy K, Stein K, et al. Does participating in physical activity in outdoor natural environments have a greater effect on physical and mental wellbeing than physical activity indoors? A systematic review. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:1761–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100:126–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brymer E, Davids K, Mallabon L. Understanding the psychological health and wellbeing benefits of physical activity in nature: an ecological dynamics analysis. Ecopsychology 2014;6:189–97.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fjortoft I. The natural environment as a playground for children: the impact of outdoor play activities in pre-primary school children. Early Childhood Educ J. 2001;29:111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laaksoharju T, Rappe E, Kaivola T. Garden affordances for social learning, play, and for building nature-child relationship. Urban For Urban Green. 2012;11:195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wheeler BW, Cooper AR, Page AS, et al. Greenspace and children’s physical activity: A GPS/GIS analysis of the PEACH project. Prev Med. 2010;51:148–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gladwell VF, Brown DK, Barton JL, et al. The effects of views of nature on autonomic control. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:3379–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barton J, Griffin M, Pretty J. Exercise-nature-and socially interactive-based initiatives improve mood and self-esteem in the clinical population. Perspect Public Health. 2012;132:89–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marselle MR, Irvine KN, Warber SL. Walking for well-being: are group walks in certain types of natural environments better for well-being than group walks in urban environments? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:5603–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Mackay G, Neill JT. The effect of “ green exercise” on state anxiety and the role of exercise duration, intensity, and greenness: a quasi-experiment study. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2010;11:238–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Townsend M. Feel blue? Touch green! participation in forest/woodland management as a treatment for depression. Urban For Urban Green. 2006;5:111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali LM, Knight TM, et al. A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. Bio Med Cent. 2010;10:471–2458.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gilchrist K. Promoting wellbeing through environment: the role of urban forestry. ICF Urban Trees Research Conference; 2011. pp. 84–93.

  22. Chawla L, Keena K, Pevec I, et al. Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health Place. 2014;27:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Withagen R, de Poel HJ, Araújo D, et al. Affordances can invite behaviour: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas Psychol. 2012;30:250–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Linderoth J. Why gamers don’t learn more. An ecological approach to games as learning environments. J Gaming Virtual Worlds. 2012;4:45–62.

  25. Araújo D, Davids K, Hristovski R. The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2006;7:653–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsiao-Pu Yeh.

Ethics declarations

No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article. HP Yeh, JA Stone, SM Churchill, JS Wheat, E Brymer and K Davids declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the content of this review.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Designing environments to enhance physical and psychological benefits of physical activity: A multi-disciplinary perspective.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeh, HP., Stone, J.A., Churchill, S.M. et al. Physical, Psychological and Emotional Benefits of Green Physical Activity: An Ecological Dynamics Perspective. Sports Med 46, 947–953 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0374-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0374-z

Keywords

Navigation