Skip to main content
Log in

Patient Cases: 1. A Patient with Apparent Compliance

  • Case Report
  • Published:
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compliance with antihypertensive therapy decreases over time and as the number of pills increases. This case describes a 64-year-old male with hypertension who was initially prescribed antihypertensive therapy with olmesartan (OLM) once daily in the morning and amlodipine (AML) once daily in the evening. Reductions in blood pressure (BP) were observed, but BP control was not achieved. Therefore, an evening dose of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) was added to the treatment regimen. Despite stating that he was adhering to therapy, the patient’s prescription records indicated otherwise. The patient was switched to an OLM/AML/HCTZ single-pill fixed-dose combination and BP had decreased to the normal range at a follow-up visit 3 months later.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013;31:1281–357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stumpe KO, Ludwig M. Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan compared with other antihypertensive drugs. J Hum Hypertens. 2002;16:S24–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Oparil S, Williams D, Chrysant SG, et al. Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens. 2001;3:283–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunner HR, Stumpe KO, Januszewicz A. Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with essential hypertension. Clin Drug Invest. 2003;23:419–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Giles TD, Oparil S, Silfani TN, et al. Comparison of increasing doses of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, and valsartan in patients with essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens. 2007;9:187–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Materson BJ, Reda DJ, Cushman WC. Department of veterans Affairs single-drug therapy of hypertension study. Revised figures and new data. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Antihypertensive Agents. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:189–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vrijens B, Vincze G, Kristanto P, et al. Adherence to prescribed antihypertensive drug treatments: longitudinal study of electronically compiled dosing histories. BMJ. 2008;336:1114–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK, et al. Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: meta-analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials. Am J Med. 2009;122:290–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chapman RH, Benner JS, Petrilla AA, et al. Predictors of adherence with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1147–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Renata Perego, Nicola Ryan and Raelene Simpson, independent medical writers, who provided editorial assistance on behalf of Springer Healthcare Communications. This assistance was supported by the Menarini group.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Sarafidis has served as a speaker/advisor for AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, the Menarini group and Daiichi Sankyo. The activities conducted with the support of the Menarini group do not constitute a conflict of interest in relation to the contents of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pantelis A. Sarafidis.

Additional information

Please refer to the approved SmPC for the correct use of the drugs mentioned in this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarafidis, P.A. Patient Cases: 1. A Patient with Apparent Compliance. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 22 (Suppl 1), 15–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-015-0109-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-015-0109-0

Keywords

Navigation