Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Case Note on “Trésor-Armani-Mania”

Intellectual Property Code, Sec. L. 112-1 – SNC Lancôme Parfums et Beauté and co., GA Modefine and Prestige et collection international v. M.X.

  • Case Note
  • France
  • Published:
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. See the decision of principle of the Supreme Court, 1st Civil Chamber, 13 June 2006 (D. 2006, AJ, 1741, note J. Daleau; D. 2006, Jur. 2470, note B. Edelman; D. 2006. Pan. 2993, obs. P. Sirinelli; JCP 2006, II, 10138, note F. Pollaud-Dulian; JCP 2006, I, 162, § 5, obs. C. Caron; JCP E 2006. 2183; JCP E 2007, 1114, § 1, obs. M.-E. Laporte-Legeais; Propr. intell. 2007, No. 24, p. 364, obs. M. Vivant; RTD com. 2006, 587, obs. F. Pollaud-Dulian; Dr. et patr. 2007, No. 156, p. 42, note J.-M. Bruguière; 37 IIC 988 (2006) and two more posterior decisions: Supreme Court, Commercial Chamber, 1 July 2008, Case No. 07-13952 (D. 2008, AJ, 1993, note J. Daleau; D. 2009, 1182, note B. Edelman; JCP 2009, No. 25, 30, § 2, obs. C. Caron; JCP E 2008, 2087, Propr. intell. 2009, No. 25, 419, obs. J.-M. Bruguière; PIBD 2008, 882, III, 585; RLDI, Oct. 2008, No. 1376, obs. L. Costes; Comm. Com. Electr. 2008, comm. 100, obs. Caron; RTD com. 2008, 735, obs. F. Pollaud-Dulian; RIDA 3/2008, p. 315; 41 IIC 234 (2010) and Supreme Court, 1st civil Chamber, 22 January 2009, Case No 08-11404, RIDA 1/2009, p. 371; JCP 2009, No. 25, 30 § 2, obs. C. Caron; RIDA 2009, No. 219, 199, obs. P. Sirinelli; RTD com. 2009, 302, obs. F. Pollaud-Dullian).

  2. See, among others, Lucas A, Lucas H-J and Lucas-Schloetter A Traité de la propriété littéraire et artistique at 93 ff. and the references at footnote 55 (4th edn. LexisNexis, Paris 2012).

  3. See for instance the appeal decision of the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal, 10 December 2010, 8th Ch., B, No. 2010/475 – SNC Lancôme Parfums v. SA Argeville, Propr. Intell., January 2011, No. 38, p. 81, note J.-M. Bruguière, which openly defied the decision of the Supreme Court, 1st Civil Chamber, 22 January 2009 (supra note 1); Court of Appeal of Paris, 4th Ch., Sect. A, 14 February 2007, Case No. 06/09813, Comm. Comm. Electr., 2007, comm. 81, note Caron; Paris Court of Appeal (Cour d’appel) (4th Chamber A), 25 January 2006, Case No. 2006-292501 Sté Bellure NV v. SA L'Oréal et al., 37 IIC 880 (2006). Cf. the opinion of the advocate general Jerry Sainte-Rose in the decision of the Supreme Court, 1st Civil Chamber, 13 June 2006, (supra note 1), Gaz. Pal. Rec., 2006, p. 2255.

  4. Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad), 1st Chamber, 16 June 2006, Case No. C04/327HR – Kecofa B.V. v. Lancôme Parfums et Beauté and Co. S.N.C., WIPO Magazine, Oct. 2006, p. 2; EIPR, N-174; 37 IIC 997 (2006).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Athens, Greece

    Theodoros Chiou (Attorney-at-Law; PhD Candidate at the CEIPI University of Strasbourg and the University of Athens)

Authors
  1. Theodoros Chiou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodoros Chiou.

Additional information

For a translation of this decision by Theodoros Chiou, see this issue of IIC at doi:10.1007/s40319-014-0262-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chiou, T. Case Note on “Trésor-Armani-Mania”. IIC 45, 852–854 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0263-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-014-0263-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation