Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of injection molding parameters on the uniformity of porous array of polymer microfluidic chip

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The uniformity of the porous array seriously affects the performance of the injection-molded parts. In this study, a uniform hole array chip constituted by 384 holes whose radiuses are 1.30 mm is fabricated by precision injection molding technology. To capture the relevance between the uniform dimension of the porous array and the injection molding process parameters, single factor experiment was adopted. Besides, the condensed state of the hole array was studied to give a further explanation of the inner relationship between the hole array and the most sensitive injection process. As for the measurement, the diameter of the hole which next to the gate and away from the gate was investigated by means of universal tool-measuring microscope, and the standard deviation of the hole diameter was chosen to estimate the uniformity of the hole array. Furthermore, the crystal state and interface state were characterized by polarized light microscopy (PLM), used to explain why the difference of those holes appeared. The results reveal that the impact of process parameters on the uniformity of the hole array was ranked as follows: melt temperature, cooling time, mold temperature, injection pressure, injection speed and packing pressure. Besides, the analysis of the condensed state on different melt temperature indicates that the larger grain size is less favorable to the uniform molding, as the melt temperature increases, the difference of cortical thickness between the dynamic template and fixed template sides decreases, product uniformity is improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cummins C, Gangnaik A (2015) Parallel Arrays of sub-10 nm aligned germanium nanofins from an in situ metal oxide hardmask using directed self-assembly of block copolymers. Chem Mater 27:6091–6096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Song M, Liu Y (2013) Research on incorporate injection molding of the cover sheet and the substrate sheet for microfluidic chip. Mater Sci Technol 21:13–17

    Google Scholar 

  3. Konstantinou D, Shirazi A (2016) Combined hot embossing and milling for medium volume production of thermoplastic microfluidic devices. Sens Actuat B Chem 234:209–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Metwally K, Barreiere T, Khan-Malek C (2016) Replication of micrometric and sub-micrometric structured surfaces using micro-injection and micro-injection compression molding. Manuf Technol 83:779–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Packianather M, Griffiths C, Kadir W (2015) Micro injection molding process parameter tuning. Proc CIRP 33:400–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hong S-Z (2005) Precision injection molding and factor of mold designing. Die Mould Technol 4:24–33

    Google Scholar 

  7. ManCang S, Hui Z, Shan LJ (2016) Replication of large scale micro pillar array with different diameters by micro injection molding. Microsyst Technol 10:1007–1016

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matschuk M, Larsen NB (2013) Injection molding of high aspect ratio sub-100 nm nanostructures. J Micromech Microeng 23:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen X, Leary TF, Maldarelli C (2017) Transport of biomolecules to binding partners displayed on the surface of microbeads arrayed in traps in a microfluidic cell. Biomicrofluidics 11:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lee F-W, Hung W-H, Ma C-W, Yang Y-J (2016) Polymer-based disposable microneedle array with insertion assisted by vibratingmotion. Biomicrofluidics 10:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henriksen AD, Rozlosnik N, Hansen MF (2015) Geometrical optimization of microstripe arrays for microbead magnetophoresis. Biomicrofluidics 9:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xiahui W, Hongwen R, Qionghua W (2016) Polymer network liquid crystal (PNLC) lenticular microlens array with no surface treatment. J Disp Technol 12:773–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lihong N, Xiaohong J, Yaolong Z (2016) Large-area, size-tunable Si nanopillar arrays with enhanced antireflective and plasmonic properties. Nanotechnology 31:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wenggang W, Haiyang M, Xiang H (2016) Fabrication and characterization of SiO2/Si heterogeneous nanopillar arrays. Nanotechnology 30:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lixia W, Bei W (2003) Research on the influence of process parameters on quality of injection molding products. J Zhengzhou Univ 24:62–66

    Google Scholar 

  16. Group of Mathematical Statistics in Institutes of China (1977) Analysis of standard deviation. Science Press, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support given by the National Key Research and Development Plan of China under Grant No. 2016YFC1202503.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Man-cang Song.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Márcio Bacci da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Mc., Wang, Xl., Hou, Sj. et al. Investigation of injection molding parameters on the uniformity of porous array of polymer microfluidic chip. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 131 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1053-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1053-4

Keywords

Navigation