Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of hypokyphosis on the biomechanical behavior of the adolescent thoracic spine

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Deformity in adolescent thoracic spine has high prevalence worldwide. The objective of this work was to study the biomechanical behavior on the thoracic spines of adolescents under asymmetric ligament load in kyphosis and rectified kyphosis. Two finite element models of an adolescent thoracic segment, T5–T10, were generated with every bone component, intervertebral discs, the flavum, intertransverse and supraspinous ligaments. The three-dimensional geometry of the T5-T10 was generated with Autodesk®Maya®, and HyperMesh® version 14.0 was used to generate the finite element models. Asymmetric ligament load of 10 N was applied in the T8–T9, with and without axial load of 400 N in the T5 vertebra. Rectified kyphosis showed the highest rotational displacement of the T8–T9 unit: 0.16° with axial load and asymmetric ligament load, and 0.22° with asymmetric ligament load alone. Kyphosis exhibited rotational displacement of 0.11° and 0.12°, respectively, for the same load conditions. Rectified kyphosis subjected to an asymmetric ligament force showed greater inoperability of the facet joints, and therefore greater vulnerability to vertebral rotation. The results suggest the need for greater attention to the vertebral assessments in the sagittal plane, beginning from the growth spurt period, to adopt preventive therapeutic in vertebral deformities such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ali A, Hosseini M, Sahari BB (2010) A review and comparison on some rubber elasticity models. J Sci Ind Res 69:495–500

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cahill PJ, Wang W, Asghar J, Booker R, Betz RR, Ramsey C, Baran G (2012) The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine following scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis. Spine 37(12):E687–E695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Castelein RM, Van Dieen JH, Smit TH (2005) The role of dorsal shear forces in the pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis—a hypothesis. Med Hypotheses 65:501–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng FH, Shih SL, Chou WK, Liu CL, Sung WH, Chen CS (2010) Finite element analysis of the scoliosis spine under different loading conditions. Bio-Med Mater Eng 20(5):251–259

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clément JL, Geoffray A, Yagoubi F, Edouard C, Solla F, Oborocianu I, Rampal V (2013) Relationship between thoracic hypokyphosis, lumbar lordosis and sagittal pelvic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22:2414–2420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickson RA, Lawton JO, Archer IA, Butt WP (1984) The pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis: biplanar spinal asymmetry. J Bone Joint Surg 66(1):8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong L, Li G, Mao H, Marek S, Yang KH (2013) Development and validation of a 10-year-old child ligamentous cervical spine finite element model. Ann Biomed Eng 41(12):2538–2552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. El Masri F, Sapin de Brosses E, Rhissassi K, Skalli W, Mitton D (2012) Apparent young’s modulus of vertebral cortico-cancellous bone specimens. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 15(1):23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fok J, Adeeb S, Carey J (2010) FEM simulation of non-progressive growth from asymmetric loading and vicious cycle theory: scoliosis study proof of concept. Open Biomed Eng J 4:162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghista DN, Vivian GR, Subbaraj K, Lozada PJ, Srinivasan TM, Barnes G (1988) Biomechanical basis of optimal scoliosis surgical-correction. J Biomech 21(2):77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Greco M, Rocha da Costa LJ (2012) Discussion on The logarithmic strain measure applied to the nonlinear positional formulation for space truss analysis [Finite Element in Analysis and Design 45 (2009) 632 639] and Nonlinear positional formulation for space truss analysis [Finite Element in Analysis and Design 42 (2006) 1079 1086]. Finite Elem Anal Des 52(1):93–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Janssen MM, Drevelle X, Humbert L, Skalli W, Castelein RM (2009) Differences in male and female spino-pelvic alignment in asymptomatic young adults: a three-dimensional analysis using upright low-dose digital biplanar X-rays. Spine 34(23):E826–E832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Janssen MM, Vincken KL, Kemp B, Obradov M, De Kleuver M, Viergever MA et al (2010) Pre-existent vertebral rotation in the human spine is influenced by body position. Stud Health Technol Inform 19:1728–1734

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jaramillo HE, Gomez L, Garcia JJ (2015) A finite element model of the L4-L5-S1 human spine segment including the heterogeneity and anisotropy of the discs. Acta Bioeng Biomech 17(2):15–24

    Google Scholar 

  15. Karasudhi P (1991) Foundations of solid mechanics, 1st edn. Kluwer, Waterloo, pp 98–102

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kotwicki T (2008) Intravertebral deformation in idiopathic scoliosis—a transverse plane computer tomographic study. J Pediatr Orthop 28:225–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kouwenhoven JWM, Smit TH, Van Der Veen AJ, Kingma I, Castelein RM (2007) Effects of dorsal versus ventral shear loads on the rotational stability of the thoracic spine. Spine 32:2545–2550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuo CS, Hu HT, Lin RM, Huang KY, Lin PC, Zhong ZC et al (2010) Biomechanical analysis of the lumbar spine on facet joint force and intradiscal pressure: a finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kurutz M (2010) Finite element modelling of human lumbar spine. In: Moratal D (ed) Finite element analysis. InTech, pp 209–236. ISBN: 978-953-307-123-7

  20. Lan CC, Kuo CS, Chen CH, Hu HT (2013) Finite element analysis of biomechanical behavior of whole thoracic-lumbar spine with ligamentous effect. Changhua J Med 11:26–41

    Google Scholar 

  21. Little JP, Adam C (2011) Patient-specific computational biomechanics for simulating adolescent scoliosis surgery: predicted vs clinical correction for a preliminary series of six patients. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 27:347–356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu YM, Hutton WC, Gharpuray VM (1996) Can variation in Intervertebral disc height affect the mechanical function of the disc? Spine 21:2208–2217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meijer GJM (2011) Development of a non-fusion scoliosis correction device numerical modelling of scoliosis correction, Ph.D. Thesis—College voor Promoties, Universiteit Twente, 165f. Enschede, The Netherlands

  24. Meijer GJM, Homminga J, Hekman EEG, Veldhuizen AG, Verkerke GJ (2010) The effect of three-dimensional geometrical changes during adolescent growth on the biomechanics of a spinal motion segment. J Biomech 43(8):1590–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nault ML, Thiong JMM, Roy-Beaudry M, Turgeon I, De Guise J, Labelle H et al (2014) Three-dimensional spinal morphology can differentiate between progressive an nonprogressive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at the initial presentation. Spine Deformity 39(10):E601–E606

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pal GP (1991) Mechanism of production of scoliosis: a hypothesis. Spine 16:288–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Panjabi MM, Brand RA, White AA (1976) Mechanical properties of the human thoracic spine. J Bone Joint Surg 58-A:642–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V (1991) Thoracic human vertebrae-quantitative three-dimensional anatomy. Spine 16:889–901

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ran B, Zhang GY, Shen F, Chen JY, Wu JB, Zhao FC et al (2014) Comparison of the sagittal profiles among thoracic idiopathic scoliosis patients with different Cobb angles and growth potentials. J Orthop Surg Res 9:19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G (2006) Spinal loads after osteoporotic vertebral fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Eur Spine J 15:1255–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roussouly P, Labelle H, Rouissi J, Bodin A (2013) Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults. Eur Spine J 22(2):S203–S215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schlosser TP, Shah SA, Reichard SJ, Roger K, Vincken KL, Castelein RM (2014) Differences in early sagittal plane alignment between thoracic and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine J 2(14):282–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmidt H, Heuer F, Wilke HJ (2009) Which axial and bending stiffnesses of posterior implants are required to design a flexible lumbar stabilization system? J Biomech 42:48–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sevastik J, Aaro S, Normelli H (1984) Scoliosis: experimental and clinical studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 191:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stokes IAF, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH (2006) Biomechanical spinal growth modulation and progressive adolescent scoliosis: a test of the “vicious cycle” pathogenetic hypothesis: summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Scoliosis 1:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stokes IA, Gardner-Morse M (1991) Analysis of the interaction between vertebral lateral deviation and axial rotation in scoliosis. J Biomech 24(8):753–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tyndyk MA, Barron V, Mchugh PE, O’Mahoney D (2007) Generation of a finite element model of the thoracolumbar spine. Acta Bioeng Biomech 9:35–46

    Google Scholar 

  38. Van Der Plaats A, Veldhuizen AG, Verkerke GJ (2007) Numerical simulation of asymmetrically altered growth as initiation mechanism of scoliosis. Ann Biomed Eng 35:1206–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Villemure I, Aubin CE, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2002) Simulation of progressive deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a biomechanical model integrating vertebral growth modulation. J Biomech Eng 124:784–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang W, Baran GR, Betz RR, Samdani AF, Pahys JM, Cahill PJ (2014) The use of finite element models to assist understanding and treatment for scoliosis: a review paper. Spine Deformity 2:10–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. White AA (1971) Kinematics of the normal spine as related to scoliosis. J Biomech 4:405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Willner S, Johnson B (1983) Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis during the growth period in children. Acta Paediatr Scand 72(6):873–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zander T, Rohlmann A, Calisse J, Bergmann G (2001) Estimation of muscle forces in the lumbar spine during upper body inclination. Clin Biomech 16:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge CNPq (National Council of Scientific and Technological Development) and FAPEMIG (Minas Gerais State Research Foundation), in Brazil, for their financial support under grant numbers 441573/2014-2, 302376/2016-0 and TEC-PPM-00409-16, respectively. The authors would also like to acknowledge the grammar revision service provided by the Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Engenharia de Estruturas, Escola de Engenharia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

    Rozilene Maria C. Aroeira & Marcelo Greco

  2. Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Escola de Engenharia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil

    Antônio Eustáquio M. Pertence

  3. Centro de Tecnologia da Informação, Divisão de Tecnologia Tridimensional (DT3D), Campinas, Brazil

    Daniel Takanori Kemmoku

Authors
  1. Rozilene Maria C. Aroeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antônio Eustáquio M. Pertence
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Takanori Kemmoku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marcelo Greco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Greco.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Sadek C. Absi Alfaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aroeira, R.M.C., Pertence, A.E.M., Kemmoku, D.T. et al. The effect of hypokyphosis on the biomechanical behavior of the adolescent thoracic spine. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 128 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1061-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1061-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation