Abstract
The primary focus of the present experiment was to study participants’ self-talk during conditional discrimination training and test for the emergence of conditional relations consistent with equivalence. Eighteen adult participants were exposed to either a Many-to-One (MTO) or a One-to-Many (OTM) training structure arranged as a 6-s delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) procedure. During training and testing, participants were asked to talk aloud. Each trial was divided into three time-windows for recording vocal responses. The first time-window was when the sample was presented, the second time-window was the delay following the offset of the sample stimulus until the onset of the comparisons, and the final time-window was when the comparison array was presented. Overall, participants in the OTM condition talked more than participants in the MTO condition. The participants exposed to MTO increased talking during the third time-window from last part of training to test more than the participants in the OTM condition. For 16 of the 18 participants, talking aloud was less than 55% in the second time-window (during the delay). Conversely, talking in the first and third time-windows were higher than 90% in both groups. Thus, it seems that talking is affected by the shift from training to testing to a greater degree when exposed to MTO than OTM. Furthermore, the data indicate that the participants did not need to talk aloud during the delay to respond correctly on DMTS trials.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvero, A. M., & Austin, J. (2006). An implementation of protocol analysis and the silent dog method in the area of behavioral safety. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 22, 61–79.
Arntzen, E. (2004). Probability of equivalence formation: Familiar stimuli and training sequence. The Psychological Record, 54, 275–291.
Arntzen, E. (2006). Delayed matching to sample and stimulus equivalence: Probability of responding in accord with equivalence as a function of different delays. The Psychological Record, 56, 135–167.
Arntzen, E., Galaen, T., & Halvorsen, L. R. (2007). Different retention intervals in delayed matching-to-sample: Effects of responding in accord with equivalence. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8, 177–191. doi:10.1080/15021149.2007.11434281
Arntzen, E., Grondahl, T., & Eilifsen, C. (2010b). The effects of different training structures in the establishment of conditional discriminations and the subsequent performance on the tests for stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 60, 437–462.
Arntzen, E., Halstadtro, L. B., Bjerke, E., & Halstadtro, M. (2010a). Training and testing music skills in a boy with autism using a matching-to-sample format. Behavioral Interventions, 25, 1–15. doi:10.1002/Bin.301
Arntzen, E., Halstadtro, L. B., & Halstadtro, M. (2009). The “silent dog” method: A procedure for analyzing the impact of self-generated rules when teaching different computer chains in two boys with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 51–66.
Arntzen, E., & Hansen, S. (2011). Training structures and the formation of equivalence classes. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12, 483–503. doi:10.1080/15021149.2011.11434397
Arntzen, E., & Vie, A. (2013). The expression of equivalence classes influenced by distractors during DMTS test trials. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 14, 151–164. doi:10.1080/15021149.2013.11434453
Cabello, F., Luciano, C., Gomez, I., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Human schedule performance, protocol analysis, and the "silent dog" methodology. The Psychological Record, 54, 405–422.
Carp, C. L., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2015). Intraverbal naming and equivalence class formation in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 104, 223–240. doi:10.1002/jeab.183
Dugdale, N., & Lowe, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 115–138). Hove, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Eikeseth, S., & Smith, T. (1992). The development of functional and equivalence classes in high-functioning autistic children: The role of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 123–133. doi:10.1901/jeab.1992.58-123
Eilifsen, C., & Arntzen, E. (2011). Single-subject withdrawal designs in delayed matching-to sample procedures. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12, 157–172. doi:10.1080/15021149.2011.11434361
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (revised ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fields, L., Hobbie-Reeve, S. A., Adams, B. J., & Reeve, K. F. (1999). Effects of training directionality and class size on equivalence class formation by adults. The Psychological Record, 49, 703–724.
Garcia, Y. A., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2008). The effects of common names and common FR responses on the emergence of stimulus equivalence classes. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 9, 99–120. doi:10.1080/15021149.2008.11434298
Hayes, S. C., White, D., & Bissett, R. T. (1998). Protocol analysis and the "silent dog" method of analyzing the impact of self-generated rules. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15, 57–63.
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–241. doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185
Horne, P. J., Lowe, C. F., & Harris, F. D. A. (2007). Naming and categorization in young children: V. Manual sign training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 367–381. doi:10.1901/jeab.2007.52-06
Horne, P. J., Lowe, C. F., & Randle, V. R. (2004). Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81, 267–288. doi:10.1901/jeab.2004.81-267
Imam, A. A. (2006). Experimental control of nodality via equal presentations of conditional discriminations in different equivalence protocols under speed and no-speed conditions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 107–124. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.58-04
Lane, S. D., & Critchfield, T. S. (1996). Verbal self-reports of emergent relations in a stimulus equivalence procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 355–374. doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.65-355
Lian, T., & Arntzen, E. (2013). Delayed matching-to-sample and linear series training structures. The Psychological Record, 63, 545–561.
Lowe, C. F., Horne, P. J., Harris, F. D. A., & Randle, V. R. L. (2002). Naming and categorization in young children: Vocal tact training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 527–549. doi:10.1901/jeab.2004.81-267
Lowenkron, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of Experimantal Analysis of Behavior, 69, 327–354. doi:10.1901/jeab.1998.69-327
Ma, M. L., Miguel, C. F., & Jennings, A. M. (2016). Training intraverbal naming to establish equivalence class performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105, 409–426. doi:10.1002/jeab.203
Mandell, C., & Sheen, V. (1994). Equivalence class formation as a function of the pronounceability of the sample stimulus. Behavioural Processes, 32, 29–46. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(94)90025-6
Miguel, C. F. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 125–138
Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2008). The role of naming in stimulus categorization by preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 383–405. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008-89-383
Petursdottir, A. I., Carp, C. L., Peterson, S. P., & Lepper, T. L. (2015). Emergence of visual–visual conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103, 332–348. doi:10.1002/jeab.136
Randell, T., & Remington, B. (2006). Equivalence relations, contextual control, and naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 337–354. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.82-05
Rehfeldt, R. A., Dixon, M. R., Hayes, L. J., & Steele, A. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and the blocking effect. The Psychological Record, 48, 647–664
Santos, P. M., Ma, M. L., & Miguel, C. F. (2015). Training intraverbal naming to establish matching-to-sample performances. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 162–182
Saunders, R. R., Chaney, L., & Marquis, J. G. (2005). Equivalence class establishment with two, three-, and four-choice matching to sample by senior citizens. The Psychological Record, 55, 539–559
Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5
Sidman, M., Willson-Morris, M., & Kirk, B. (1986). Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: the role of naming. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 1–19. doi:10.1016/0270-4684(86)90003-0
Tomanari, G. Y., Sidman, M., Rubio, A. R., & Dube, W. V. (2006). Equivalence classes with requirements for short response latencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 349–369. doi:10.1901/jeab.2006.107-04
Vaidya, M., & Smith, K. N. (2006). Delayed matching-to-sample training facilitates derived relational responding. Experimental Analysis of Human Behaviour Bulletin, 24, 9–16
Wulfert, E., Dougher, M. J., & Greenway, D. E. (1991). Protocol analysis of the correspondence of verbal behavior and equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 489–504. doi:10.1901/jeab.1991.56-489
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics Statement
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vie, A., Arntzen, E. Talk-Aloud Protocols during Conditional Discrimination Training and Equivalence Class Formation. Analysis Verbal Behav 33, 80–97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-017-0081-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-017-0081-y