Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Overview of Sacral Decubitus Ulcer

  • Wound Care After Injury (H Kaafarani and J Goverman, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Trauma Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Pressure injuries, known as decubitus ulcers, are a challenge to the healthcare community. One of the most common sites involved is the sacrum.

Recent Findings

There are four main factors that cause pressure injuries: pressure over bony prominence, shear force, destruction of skin, and compromised blood flow.

Summary

While primary prevention of pressure ulcers remains essential, sound wound care, optimization of nutrition, and secondary prevention of ulcer deterioration are the main components of management of this complex clinical entity. In addition, various novel surgical reconstruction flaps (e.g., V-Y fasciocutaneous advancement and gluteus maximus muscle rotation flaps) can help with early tissue coverage and fasten recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. •• National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) announces a change in terminology from pressure ulcer to pressure injury and updates the stages of pressure. injury. 2016. http://www.npuap.org/national-pressure-ulcer-advisory-panel-npuap-announces-a-change-in-terminology-from-pressure-ulcer-to-pressure-injury-and-updates-the-stages-of-pressure-injury/. Accessed August 1, 2018;2018. The reference highlights a significant change in terminology that is appropriate to use for sacral decubitus ulcers.

  2. Campbell C, Parish LC. The decubitus ulcer: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2010;28(5):527–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2010.03.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weizhong L, Zuojun Z, Junling W, Hongmei A. The combination application of space filling and closed irrigation suction in reconstruction of sacral decubitus ulcer. Int Surg. 2014;99(5):623–7. https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-13-00033.1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cushing CA, Phillips LG. Evidence-based medicine: pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(6):1720–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a808ba.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Therattil PJ, Pastor C, Granick MS. Sacral pressure ulcer. Eplasty. 2013;13:ic18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones J. Stress responses, pressure ulcer development and adaptation. Br J Nurs. 2003;12(11 Suppl):S17–8, S20, S2 passim. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2003.12.Sup2.11321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. • Marchi M, Battaglia S, Marchese S, Intagliata E, Spataro C, Vecchio R. Surgical reconstructive procedures for treatment of ischial, sacral and trochanteric pressure ulcers. G Chir. 2015;36(3):112–6 The referenced article discusses the most common pressure injuries.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ek AC, Gustavsson G, Lewis DH. Skin blood flow in relation to external pressure and temperature in the supine position on a standard hospital mattress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1987;19(3):121–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaul E, Menczel J. A comparative, descriptive study of systemic factors and survival in elderly patients with sacral pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2015;61(3):20–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Whittington K, Patrick M, Roberts JL. A national study of pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in acute care hospitals. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing : Official Publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 2000;27(4):209–15. https://doi.org/10.1067/mjw.2000.107879.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark M, Rowland LB, Wood HA, Crow RA. Measurement of soft tissue thickness over the sacrum of elderly hospital patients using B-mode ultrasound. J Biomed Eng. 1989;11(3):200–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. • Bauer K, Rock K, Nazzal M, Jones O, Qu W. Pressure ulcers in the United States’ inpatient population from 2008 to 2012: results of a retrospective nationwide study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016;62(11):30–8 The referenced article reports that pressure injuries in the sacram is common.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Odden MC, Coxson PG, Moran A, Lightwood JM, Goldman L, Bibbins-Domingo K. The impact of the aging population on coronary heart disease in the United States. Am J Med. 2011;124(9):827–33 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.04.010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Murphy RA, Patel KV, Kritchevsky SB, Houston DK, Newman AB, Koster A, et al. Weight change, body composition, and risk of mobility disability and mortality in older adults: a population-based cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(8):1476–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12954.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Boyko TV, Longaker MT, Yang GP. Review of the current management of pressure ulcers. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018;7(2):57–67. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2016.0697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sen CK, Gordillo GM, Roy S, Kirsner R, Lambert L, Hunt TK, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17(6):763–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. VanGilder C, Amlung S, Harrison P, Meyer S. Results of the 2008-2009 International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey and a 3-year, acute care, unit-specific analysis. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009;55(11):39–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubayi S, Chandrasekhar BS. Trunk, abdomen, and pressure sore reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(3):201e–15e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822214c1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gorecki C, Brown JM, Nelson EA, Briggs M, Schoonhoven L, Dealey C, et al. Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(7):1175–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02307.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomas DR. Does pressure cause pressure ulcers? An inquiry into the etiology of pressure ulcers. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010;11(6):397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2010.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lyder CH. Pressure ulcer prevention and management. JAMA. 2003;289(2):223–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Agrawal K, Chauhan N. Pressure ulcers: back to the basics. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery: Official Publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. 2012;45(2):244–54. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.101287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smart H. Deep tissue injury: what is it really? Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013;26(2):56–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000426712.72787.f3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stekelenburg A, Strijkers GJ, Parusel H, Bader DL, Nicolay K, Oomens CW. Role of ischemia and deformation in the onset of compression-induced deep tissue injury: MRI-based studies in a rat model. J Appl Physiol. 2007;102(5):2002–11. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01115.2006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cooper KL. Evidence-based prevention of pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Nurse. 2013;33(6):57–66. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2013985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. •• NPUAP Pressure Injury Stages. 2016. http://www.npuap.org/resources/educational-and-clinical-resources/npuap-pressure-injury-stages/. Accessed July 8 2018. The reference highlights the most up to date clinical staging of pressure injuries.

  27. • Zhao JC, Zhang BR, Shi K, Yu JA, Wang J, Yu QH, et al. Couple-kissing flaps for successful repair of severe sacral pressure ulcers in frail elderly patients. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0680-4 The reference reports the significance of using a surgical technique for treating sacral decubitus ulcers and factors that can delay healing.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bejany DE, Chao R, Perito PE, Politano VA. Continent urinary diversion and diverting colostomy in the therapy of non-healing pressure sores in paraplegic patients. Paraplegia. 1993;31:242. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1993.43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bliss M, Simini B. When are the seeds of postoperative pressure sores sown? Often during surgery. BMJ. 1999;319(7214):863–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Takeda T, Koyama T, Izawa Y, Makita T, Nakamura N. Effects of malnutrition on development of experimental pressure sores. J Dermatol. 1992;19(10):602–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cakmak SK, Gul U, Ozer S, Yigit Z, Gonu M. Risk factors for pressure ulcers. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009;22(9):412–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Asw.0000360256.99980.84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Allman RM, Laprade CA, Noel LB, Walker JM, Moorer CA, Dear MR, et al. Pressure sores among hospitalized patients. Ann Intern Med. 1986;105(3):337–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bergstrand S, Lanne T, Ek AC, Lindberg LG, Linden M, Lindgren M. Existence of tissue blood flow in response to external pressure in the sacral region of elderly individuals--using an optical probe prototype. Microcirculation (New York, NY : 1994). 2010;17(4):311–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00027.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilczweski P, Grimm D, Gianakis A, Gill B, Sarver W, McNett M. Risk factors associated with pressure ulcer development in critically ill traumatic spinal cord injury patients. Journal of Trauma Nursing : the Official Journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses. 2012;19(1):5–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0b013e31823a4528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen HL, Shen WQ, Xu YH, Zhang Q, Wu J. Perioperative corticosteroids administration as a risk factor for pressure ulcers in cardiovascular surgical patients: a retrospective study. Int Wound J. 2015;12(5):581–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. • Levy A, Schwartz D, Gefen A. The contribution of a directional preference of stiffness to the efficacy of prophylactic sacral dressings in protecting healthy and diabetic tissues from pressure injury: computational modelling studies. Int Wound J. 2017;14(6):1370–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12821 The reference describes Diabetes as a significant risk factor for sacral decubitus ulcers.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res. 2010;89(3):219–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509359125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Finestone HM, Levine SP, Carlson GA, Chizinsky KA, Kett RL. Erythema and skin temperature following continuous sitting in spinal cord injured individuals. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1991;28(4):27–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schubert V, Fagrell B. Postocclusive reactive hyperemia and thermal response in the skin microcirculation of subjects with spinal cord injury. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23(1):33–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sae-Sia W, Wipke-Tevis DD, Williams DA. The effect of clinically relevant pressure duration on sacral skin blood flow and temperature in patients after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12):1673–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Defloor T, Grypdonck MF. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14(3):373–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01058.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. van Marum RJ, Ooms ME, Ribbe MW, van Eijk JT. The Dutch pressure sore assessment score or the Norton scale for identifying at-risk nursing home patients? Age Ageing. 2000;29(1):63–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Segal O, Hassin-Baer S, Kliers I, Cale KS, Segal G. Low Norton scale score predicts worse outcomes for Parkinson’s disease patients hospitalized due to infection. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2015;1:2333721415608139. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333721415608139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL, Garcia-Fernandez FP, Lopez-Medina IM, Alvarez-Nieto C. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(1):94–110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03794.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cox J, Roche S, Murphy V. Pressure injury risk factors in critical care patients: a descriptive analysis. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018;31(7):328–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000534699.50162.4e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Blazina I, Starmer AJ, Reitel K, et al. Pressure ulcer risk assessment and prevention: a systematic comparative effectiveness review. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159(1):28–38. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-159-1-201307020-00006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moore ZE, Cowman S. Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(2):Cd006471. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006471.pub3.

  48. Webster J, Coleman K, Mudge A, Marquart L, Gardner G, Stankiewicz M, et al. Pressure ulcers: effectiveness of risk-assessment tools. A randomised controlled trial (the ULCER trial). BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(4):297–306. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs.2010.043109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Stechmiller JK, Cowan L, Whitney JD, Phillips L, Aslam R, Barbul A, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16(2):151–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00356.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Truong B, Grigson E, Patel M, Liu X. Pressure ulcer prevention in the hospital setting using silicone foam dressings. Cureus. 2016;8(8):e730. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.730.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Reddy M, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(8):974–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.8.974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Torra i Bou JE, Segovia Gomez T, Verdu Soriano J, Nolasco Bonmati A, Rueda Lopez J, Arboix i Perejamo M. The effectiveness of a hyperoxygenated fatty acid compound in preventing pressure ulcers. J Wound Care. 2005;14(3):117–21. https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2005.14.3.26752.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Grey JE, Harding KG, Enoch S. Pressure ulcers. BMJ. 2006;332(7539):472–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7539.472.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Levine SM, Sinno S, Levine JP, Saadeh PB. Current thoughts for the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: using the evidence to determine fact or fiction. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):603–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318285516a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. • McInnes E, Jammali-Blasi A, Bell-Syer SE, Dumville JC, Middleton V, Cullum N. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(9):Cd001735. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001735.pub5 The referenced article discusses the importance of specialized mattresses for preventing and managing sacral decubitus ulcers.

  56. Young T. The 30 degree tilt position vs the 90 degree lateral and supine positions in reducing the incidence of non-blanching erythema in a hospital inpatient population: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Tissue Viability. 2004;14(3):88, 90, 2-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nanjo Y, Nakagami G, Kaitani T, Naito A, Takehara K, Lijuan J, et al. Relationship between morphological characteristics and etiology of pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing : Official Publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 2011;38(4):404–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0b013e318220b6bc.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Moore ZE, Cowman S. Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(3):Cd004983. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004983.pub3.

  59. • Santamaria N, Gerdtz M, Sage S, McCann J, Freeman A, Vassiliou T, et al. A randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of soft silicone multi-layered foam dressings in the prevention of sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: the border trial. Int Wound J. 2015;12(3):302–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12101 The article discusses the effectiveness of pressure reducing dressings preventing sacral decubitus ulcers in critically ill patients.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. • Byrne J, Nichols P, Sroczynski M, Stelmaski L, Stetzer M, Line C, et al. Prophylactic sacral dressing for pressure ulcer prevention in high-risk patients. American Journal of Critical Care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. 2016;25(3):228–34. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2016979 The above reference discusses the importance of pressure reducing dressings.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. • Padula WV. Effectiveness and value of prophylactic 5-layer foam sacral dressings to prevent hospital-acquired pressure injuries in acute care hospitals: an observational cohort study. Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing: official publication of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. 2017;44(5):413–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0000000000000358 The referenced article reports how pressure reducing dressings can prevent patients from developing sacral decubitus ulcers.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. • Forni C, D’Alessandro F, Gallerani P, Genco R, Bolzon A, Bombino C, et al. Effectiveness of using a new polyurethane foam multi-layer dressing in the sacral area to prevent the onset of pressure ulcer in the elderly with hip fractures: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Int Wound J. 2018;15(3):383–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12875 The article discusses how pressure reducing dressings can help with treating sacral decubitus ulcers and also decrease the overall cost of patient care.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Langer G, Fink A. Nutritional interventions for preventing and treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(6):Cd003216. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003216.pub2.

  64. Thomas DR. The new F-tag 314: prevention and management of pressure ulcers. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006;7(8):523–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2006.05.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Gould L, Abadir P, Brem H, Carter M, Conner-Kerr T, Davidson J, et al. Chronic wound repair and healing in older adults: current status and future research. Wound Repair Regen. 2015;23(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12245.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Felder JM 3rd, Hechenbleikner E, Jordan M, Jeng J. Increasing the options for management of large and complex chronic wounds with a scalable, closed-system dressing for maggot therapy. Journal of Burn Care & Research : official publication of the American Burn Association. 2012;33(3):e169–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e318233570d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hurbungs A, Ramkalawan H. Sacral pressure sore reconstruction -- the pedicled superior gluteal artery perforator flap. S Afr J Surg. 2012;50(1):6–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Wong TC, Ip FK. Comparison of gluteal fasciocutaneous rotational flaps and myocutaneous flaps for the treatment of sacral sores. Int Orthop. 2006;30(1):64–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0031-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Yamamoto Y, Ohura T, Shintomi Y, Sugihara T, Nohira K, Igawa H. Superiority of the fasciocutaneous flap in reconstruction of sacral pressure sores. Ann Plast Surg. 1993;30(2):116–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Kawata S, Ohta S, Ikeda A. The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91(4):678–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. • Han HH, Choi EJ, Moon SH, Lee YJ, Oh DY. Combined V-Y Fasciocutaneous advancement and gluteus Maximus muscle rotational flaps for treating sacral sores. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8714713. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8714713 The referenced article discusses the most beneficial surgical technique for treating sacral decubitus ulcers.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Fujioka M, Hayashida K, Morooka S, Saijo H. A retrospective comparison of perforator and rotation flaps for the closure of extensive stage IV sacral pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2014;60(4):42–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Chen YC, Huang EY, Lin PY. Comparison of gluteal perforator flaps and gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation flaps for reconstruction of sacral pressure sores. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014;67(3):377–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Aggarwal A, Sangwan SS, Siwach RC, Batra KM. Gluteus maximus island flap for the repair of sacral pressure sores. Spinal Cord. 1996;34(6):346–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Thiessen FE, Andrades P, Blondeel PN, Hamdi M, Roche N, Stillaert F, et al. Flap surgery for pressure sores: should the underlying muscle be transferred or not? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(1):84–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.03.049.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. • Hsiao YC, Chuang SS. Dual-dermal-barrier fashion flaps for the treatment of sacral pressure sores. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015;49(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/2000656x.2013.792269 The above reference describes a surgical technique for treating sacral decubitus ulcers.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Prado A, Ocampo C, Danilla S, Valenzuela G, Reyes S, Guridi R. A new technique of “double-A” bilateral flaps based on perforators for the treatment of sacral defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;119(5):1481–90. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000256052.84466.de.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Abed Elahad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Wound Care After Injury

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abed Elahad, J., McCarthy, M.W., Goverman, J. et al. An Overview of Sacral Decubitus Ulcer. Curr Trauma Rep 4, 263–272 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-018-0152-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-018-0152-0

Keywords

Navigation