Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive Strengths in First-Episode Psychosis: Perspectives of Cognition Experts

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cognitive impairments are core features of first-episode psychosis (FEP). A cognitive strengths based approach to treatment in FEP are one complimentary yet relatively unexplored method of intervention. This study explored the perspectives of experts in the field of cognition or FEP on the usefulness of a cognitive strengths-based approach in FEP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 international cognition or FEP experts (Mage = 50.2 years). An iterative, deductive thematic analysis was used to identify codes and organize them into overarching themes. Six higher-order themes summarized the data, which were related to: cognitive strengths in practice, self-report assessment methods, potential benefits and barriers of intervention, and implementation and development. Participants were positive about cognitive strengths approaches in FEP, suggesting that it may offer intrinsic benefits (e.g., self-efficacy) and promote greater functioning. Potential barriers, including harms related to invalidating cognitive concerns, did not outweigh potential benefits. Perspectives on self-report methodology, implementation, and development, were generally mixed. Cognitive strength-based approaches in FEP are promising areas of investigation according to experts in the field of cognition and FEP. Consultation with other key stakeholders (e.g., clinicians, people with psychosis) is an essential first step towards understanding the feasibility of this type of approach in mental health settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Allott K, Steele P, Boyer F, de Winter A, Bryce S, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Phillips L. Cognitive strengths-based assessment and intervention in first-episode psychosis: a complementary approach to addressing functional recovery? Clin Psychol Rev. 2020;79:101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Alcazar-Corcoles MA, González-Blanch C, Bendall S, McGorry PD, Gleeson JF. Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: a systematic review on novel user-led interventions. Schizophr Res. 2014;156(1):96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2014.03.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Bendall S, Lederman R, Wadley G, Chinnery G, Vargas S, Larkin M, Killackey E, McGorry PD, Gleeson JF. On the HORYZON: moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2012;143:143–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alvarez-Jimenez M, Gleeson JF, Bendall S, Penn DL, Yung AR, Ryan RM, Eleftheriadis D, D’Alfonso S, Rice S, Miles C, Russon P, Lederman R, Chambers R, Gonzalez-Blanch C, Lim MH, Killackey E, McGorry PD, Nelson B. Enhancing social functioning in young people at Ultra High Risk (UHR) for psychosis: a pilot study of a novel strengths and mindfulness-based online social therapy. Schizophr Res. 2018;202:369–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.07.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Best MW, Bowie CR. A review of cognitive remediation approaches for schizophrenia: from top-down to bottom-up, brain training to psychotherapy. Expert Rev Neurother. 2017;17(7):713–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2017.1331128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowie CR, Bell MD, Fiszdon JM, Johannesen JK, Lindenmayer JP, McGurk SR, Medalia AA, Penadés R, Saperstein AM, Twamley EW, Ueland T, Wykes T. Cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: an expert working group white paper on core techniques. Schizophr Res. 2020;215:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.10.047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Campellone TR, Sanchez AH, Kring AM. Defeatist performance beliefs, negative symptoms, and functional outcome in schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review. Schizophr Bull. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbw026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardenas V, Abel S, Bowie CR, Tiznado D, Depp CA, Patterson TL, Jeste DV, Mausbach BT. When functional capacity and real-world functioning converge: the role of self-efficacy. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39(4):908–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol. 2008;49(3):182–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dixon L. Treatment engagement of individuals experiencing mental illness: review and update. World Psychiatry. 2016;15(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Early Psychosis Guidelines Writing Group and EPPIC National Support Program. Australian clinical guidelines for early psychosis 2nd edition update. Melbourne: Orygen, The national centre of excellence in youth mental health; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kambeitz-Ilankovic L, Betz LT, Dominke C, Haas SS, Subramaniam K, Fisher M, Vinogradov S, Koutsouleris N, Kambeitz J. Multi-outcome meta-analysis (MOMA) of cognitive remediation in schizophrenia: revisiting the relevance of human coaching and elucidating interplay between multiple outcomes. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;107:828–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.09.031.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, Williams J, Slade M. Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(6):445–52. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lederman R, Wadley G, Gleeson J, Bendall S, Alvarez-Jimenez M. Moderated online social therapy: designing and evaluating technology for mental health. ACM Trans Comput-Human Interact. 2014;21(1):1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lewandowski K. Feasibility and tolerability of a cognitive remediation clinical service in first episode coordinated specialty care. Early Interv Psychiatry. 2021;15(2):391–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malla A, Payne J. First-episode psychosis: psychopathology, quality of life, and functional outcome. Schizophr Bull. 2005;31(3):650–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbi031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. McCleery A, Nuechterlein KH. Cognitive impairment in psychotic illness: prevalence, profile of impairment, developmental course, and treatment considerations. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019;21(3):239–48. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2019.21.3/amccleery.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mesholam-Gately R, Giuliano AJ, Faraone SV, Goff KP, Seidman LJ. Neurocognition in first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review. Neuropsychology. 2009;23(3):315–36. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pantelis C, Wannan C, Bartholomeusz C, Allott K, McGorry P. Cognitive intervention in early psychosis—preserving abilities versus remediating deficits. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2015;4:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character strengths and virtues: a handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Quinlan D, Swain N, Vella-Brodrick DA. Character strengths interventions: building on what we know for improved outcomes. J Happiness Stud. 2012;13(6):1145–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9311-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quinlan DM, Swain N, Cameron C, Vella-Brodrick DA. How ‘other people matter’ in a classroom-based strengths intervention: exploring interpersonal strategies and classroom outcomes. J Posit Psychol. 2015;10(1):77–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2014.920407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rashid T, Ostermann RF. Strength-based assessment in clinical practice. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65(5):488–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Revell ER, Neill JC, Harte M, Khan Z, Drake RJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive remediation in early schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2015;168(1–2):213–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2015.08.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schrank B, Brownell T, Jakaite Z, Larkin C, Pesola F, Riches S, Tylee A, Slade M. Evaluation of a positive psychotherapy group intervention for people with psychosis: pilot randomised controlled trial. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016;25(3):235–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2045796015000141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seligman MEP, Ernst RM, Gillham J, Reivich K, Linkins M. Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxf Rev Educ. 2009;35(3):293–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980902934563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sims A, Barker C, Price C, Fornells-Ambrojo M. Psychological impact of identifying character strengths in people with psychosis. Psychosis. 2015;7(2):179–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17522439.2014.925485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Toback RL, Graham-Bermann SA, Patel PD. Outcomes of a character strengths-based intervention on self-esteem and self-efficacy of psychiatrically hospitalized youths. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;67(5):574–7. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201500021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Uren J, Cotton S, Killackey E, Saling M, Allott K. Cognitive clusters in first-episode psychosis: overlap with healthy controls and relationship to concurrent and prospective symptoms and functioning. Neuropsychology. 2017;31(7):787–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Velligan DI, Bow-Thomas CC, Huntzinger CD, Ritch J, Ledbetter N, Prihoda TJ, Miller AL. Randomized controlled trial of the use of compensatory strategies to enhance adaptive functioning in outpatients with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2000;157:1317–23. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weber M, Wagner L, Ruch W. Positive feelings at school: on the relationships between students’ character strengths, school-related affect, and school functioning. J Happiness Stud. 2016;17(1):341–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9597-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Whiting S. Semi-structured interviews: guidance for novice researchers. Nurs Stand. 2008;22(23):35–40. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2008.02.22.23.35.c6420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wood AM, Tarrier N. Positive clinical psychology: a new vision and strategy for integrated research and practice. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30(7):819–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.06.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wykes T, Huddy V, Cellard C, McGurk SR, Czobor P. A meta-analysis of cognitive remediation for schizophrenia: methodology and effect sizes. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(5):472–85. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10060855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

KA is supported by a Career Development Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; APP1141207).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Shayden Bryce and Fran Boyer have contributed equally.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orygen, 35 Poplar Road, Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia

    Shayden Bryce, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez & Kelly Allott

  2. Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Shayden Bryce, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez & Kelly Allott

  3. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Fran Boyer & Lisa J. Phillips

  4. San Diego State University, University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, USA

    Emma M. Parrish

Authors
  1. Shayden Bryce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fran Boyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lisa J. Phillips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Emma M. Parrish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kelly Allott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Allott.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research was approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 1545943.1).

Consent to participate

All participants provided written and informed consent.

Consent for publication

The authors give consent to publish this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bryce, S., Boyer, F., Phillips, L.J. et al. Cognitive Strengths in First-Episode Psychosis: Perspectives of Cognition Experts. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health 9, 177–188 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-021-00250-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-021-00250-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation