Skip to main content
Log in

Karnataka State budgets: how far they have promoted inclusiveness

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Social and Economic Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inclusiveness and inclusive development have been the key focus areas in the Indian policy-making arena, and with the Eleventh Five-Year plan, this goal attracted further commitments and targets. The primary condition for the accomplishment of these developmental goals is derived from the allocation and spending patterns of the central and state governments in this area which will help in realization of the targets in the six key areas, viz., income and poverty, education, health, women and children, infrastructure and environment. This paper analyses the inclusive philosophy underlying the budget allocation and spending under different political parties in the state of Karnataka, India. Special programs like Scheduled Caste Sub-Plan, Tribal Sub-Plan, Mahila Abhivrudhi Yojane, etc., which were conceived with increased allocation of resources, were, however, hampered by serious issues such as actual expenditure falling far short of allocation, considerable bunching with close to fifty percent of the expenditure incurred in the last quarter, and lopsided regional distribution of resources. We also examine the nature of spending over time in achieving inclusiveness in terms of regional development, women empowerment and development of different social groups. We argue that proper execution of the schemes and good planning of expenditure is need of the hour to realize the developmental outcomes envisioned.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. While all the countries listed in this database have literacy data for 2011 and 2012, India’s data refer to 2006 speaking volumes for status of statistical data in India.

  2. The state’s fiscal deficit, revenue deficit, debt, etc., have always been within the targeted levels ever since the state promulgated the Fiscal Responsibility Act in 2002. The state has one of the highest tax/GSDP ratios in the country.

References

  • Buchanan J (1950) Federalism and fiscal equity. Am Econ Rev 40:583–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos E, Pradhan S (1996) Budgetary institutions and expenditure outcomes: binding governments to fiscal performance. Policy research working paper no. 1646, The World Bank

  • Gayithri K (2014) Evaluation of state finances of Karnataka. Report submitted to Fourteenth Finance Commission, Government of India

  • Gayithri K (2016) Financing human development in Karnataka. Chapter prepared for the Karnataka Human Development Report, Planning Department, Government of Karnataka (Being processed)

  • Ghosh M (2011) Regional disparities in education, health and human development in India. Indian J Hum Dev 5:5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973703020110101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilman HR (2016) Engaging citizens: participatory budgeting and the inclusive governance movement within the United States. Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation Harvard Kennedy School. Ash Center Occasional Papers, Tony Saich, Series Editor

  • Government of India (2014) Women and men in India-2014 (16 issue). http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/man_and_women/Women_Men_In_India_2014.htm

  • Government of Karnataka (2014) Economic survey 2013–2014

  • Govinda Rao M, Chakraborty LS, Bagchi A, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy (India) (2008) Fiscal decentralisation and gender budgeting. National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraj D, Subramanian S (2012) On the “inclusiveness” of India’s consumption expenditure growth. Helsinki: WIDER. http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/2012/en_GB/wp2012-057/

  • Jena PR (2016) Reform initiatives in the budgeting system in India. Pub Budg Financ 36:106–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundle S (1998) Financing human development: some lessons from advanced Asian countries. World Dev 26:659–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015) Policy shaping and policy making: the governance of inclusive growth. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

  • Patel V (2003) Gender budget-A case study of India. Centre for Advanced Study in Economics, University of Mumbai, Working Paper UDE (CAS) 7

  • Raju PLN (1990) Fiscal incidence in Karnataka. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Bangalore, Institute for Social and Economic Change

  • Sen K, Vaidya RR (1996) Political budget cycles in India. Economic and Political Weekly: 2023–2027

  • Wampler B (2007) A guide to participatory budgeting. In: Participatory budgeting, 21–53. World Bank

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gayithri Karnam.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper is published as ISEC working paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karnam, G., Acharya, V. Karnataka State budgets: how far they have promoted inclusiveness. J. Soc. Econ. Dev. 20, 24–42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-018-0064-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-018-0064-4

Keywords

Navigation