Skip to main content
Log in

Biochar Application Rate: Improving Soil Fertility and Linum usitatissimum Growth on an Arsenic and Lead Contaminated Technosol

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The remediation of metal(loid) contaminated sites often requires the application of an amendment, such as biochar. Biochar is the product of biomass pyrolysis and has been shown to reduce soil acidity, immobilize metal(loid)s and thus ameliorate plant growth. The beneficial effects of biochar are usually higher at a higher dose. However, an excessive dose can have negative outcomes due to nutrient loss. The application of an amendment to the soil comes at a financial cost, especially if the contaminated area is large, and therefore the optimum dose must be determined. In addition, to overcome the cost of biochar application, the use of a plant with economic benefits, such as flax, can be a suitable option. In this context, a mesocosm study, on a former mining soil polluted by As and Pb was performed, using flax and biochar applied at increasing concentrations. Results showed an increase in soil pH and the immobilization of Pb with increasing biochar doses. These ameliorations led to better plant growth. A higher biochar dose increased plant growth up to a 3% application rate, from which point dry weight no longer increased.Metal(loid) concentrations decreased between 1 and 3% biochar, and then increased at higher doses. It can thus be concluded that with 3% biochar, soil properties are ameliorated, metal(loid)s are immobilized, and plant growth increases, and a higher biochar application rate does not bring about better outcomes. Therefore, a 3% biochar application dose seems to be the best application dose to improve soil conditions and plant growth at a lower cost.

Article Highlights

  • Application dose of a lightwood biochar was tested on a former mine soil

  • A higher biochar dose led to increased soil condition improvements

  • Flax growth improved up to 3% biochar then decreased

  • The optimum biochar dose was determined to be 3%

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas T, Rizwan M, Ali S, Adrees M, Mahmood A, Rehman MZ, Ibrahim M, Arsad M, Qayyum MF (2018) Biochar application increased the growth and yield and reduced cadmium in drought stressed wheat grown in an aged contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 148:825–833

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agegnehu G, Bass A, Nelson P, Muirhead B, Wright G, Bird M (2015) Biochar and biochar-compost as soil amendments: effects on peanut yield, soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical North Queensland, Australia. Agr Ecosyst Environ 213:72–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alburquerque JA, Calero JM, Barrón V, Torrent J, del Campillo MC, Gallardo A, Villar R (2014) Effects of biochars produced from different feedstocks on soil properties and sunflower growth. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177(1):16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alhashimi H, Aktas C (2017) Life cycle environmental and economic performance of biochar compared with activated carbon: a meta-analysis. Resour Conserv Recycl 118:13–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Wabel MI, Usman ARA, Al-Farraj AS, Ok YS, Abduljabbar A, Al-Faraj AI, Sallam AS (2017) Date palm waste biochars alter a soil respiration, microbial biomass carbon, and heavy metal mobility in contaminated mined soil. Environ Geochem Health 41:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Amna Ali N, Masood S, Mukhtar T, Kamran M, Rafique M, Munis M, Chaudhary H (2015) Differential effects of cadmium and chromium on growth, photosynthetic activity, and metal uptake of Linum usitatissimum in association with Glomus intraradices. Environ Monitor Assess 187(6):187–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelova V, Ivanova R, Delibaltova V, Ivanov K (2004) Bio-accumulation and distribution of heavy metals in fibre crops (flax, cotton and hemp). Ind Crops Prod 19(3):197–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arienzo M, Christen EW, Quayle W, Kumar A (2009) A review of the fate of potassium in the soil–plant system after land application of wastewaters. J Hazard Mater 164(2–3):415–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baronti S, Alberti G, Delle Vedove G, Di Gennaro F, Fellet G, Genesio L, Miglietta F, Peressotti A, Vaccari FP (2010) The biochar option to improve plant yields: first results from some field and pot experiments in Italy. Italian J Agron 5(1):3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burges A, Alkorta I, Epelde L, Garbisu C (2018) From phytoremediation of soil contaminants to phytomanagement of ecosystem services in metal contaminated sites. Int J Phytorem 20(4):384–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cristaldi A, Conti GO, Jho EH, Zuccarello P, Grasso A, Copat C, Ferrante M (2017) Phytoremediation of contaminated soils by heavy metals and PAHs. A brief review. Environ Technol Innov 8:309–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douchiche O, Soret-Morvan O, Chaïbi W, Morvan C, Paynel F (2010) Characteristics of cadmium tolerance in ‘Hermes’ flax seedlings: contribution of cell walls. Chemosphere 81(11):1430–1436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Douchiche O, Chaïbi W, Morvan C (2012) Cadmium tolerance and accumulation characteristics of mature flax, cv. Hermes: contribution of the basal stem compared to the root. J Hazard Mater 235:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellet G, Marchiol L, Delle Vedove G, Peressotti A (2011) Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere 83(9):1262–1267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Forján R, Asensio V, Rodríguez-Vila A, Covelo E (2016) Contribution of waste and biochar amendment to the sorption of metals in a copper mine tailing. CATENA 137:120–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Free H, McGill C, Rowarth J, Hedley M (2010) The effect of biochars on maize (Zea mays) germination. NZ J Agric Res 53(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hailegnaw NS, Mercl F, Pračke K, Száková J, Tlustoš P (2019) Mutual relationships of biochar and soil pH, CEC, and exchangeable base cations in a model laboratory experiment. J Soils Sediment 19:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herath I, Kumarathilaka P, Navaratne A, Rajakaruna N, Vithanage M (2014) Immobilization and phytotoxicity reduction of heavy metals in serpentine soil using biochar. J Soils Sediment 15(1):126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmid A, Al Chami Z, Sillen W, De Vocht A, Vangronsveld J (2015) Olive mill waste biochar: a promising soil amendment for metal immobilization in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(2):1444–1456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang L, Li Y, Zhao M, Chao Y, Qiu R, Yang Y, Wang S (2018) Potential of Cassia alata L. Coupled with Biochar for Heavy Metal Stabilization in Multi-Metal Mine Tailings. Int J Environ Res public health 15(3):494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasiewicz C, Antokiewicz J (2003) Assessment of common flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) usability for phytoremediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals. Chemica i inzynieria ekologiczna 10(9):901–907

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khalid S, Shahid M, Niazi N, Murtaza B, Bibi I, Dumat C (2016) A comparison of technologies for remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. J Geochem Explor 182(Part B):247–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd P, Barceló J, Bernal M, Navari-Izzo F, Poschenrieder C, Shilev S, Clemente R, Monterroso C (2009) Trace element behaviour at the root–soil interface: Implications in phytoremediation. Environ Exp Bot 67(1):243–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HS, Kim KR, Kim HJ, Yoon JH, Yang JE, Ok YS, Owens G, Kim KH (2015) Effect of biochar on heavy metal immobilization and uptake by lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in agricultural soil. Environ Earth Sci 74(2):1249–1259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laghari M, Mirjat M, Hu Z, Fazal S, Xiao B, Hu M, Chen Z, Guo D (2015) Effects of biochar application rate on sandy desert soil properties and sorghum growth. CATENA 135:313–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrun M, Macri C, Miard F, Hattab-Hambli N, Motelica-Heino M, Morabito D, Bourgerie S (2017) Effect of biochar amendments on As and Pb mobility and phytoavailability in contaminated mine technosols phytoremediated by Salix. J Geochem Explor 182:149–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrun M, Miard F, Nandillon R, Hattab-Hambli N, Scippa GS, Bourgerie S, Morabito D (2018a) Eco-restoration of a mine technosol according to biochar particle size and dose application: study of soil physico-chemical properties and phytostabilization capacities of Salix viminalis. J Soils Sediments 18(6):2188–2202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrun M, Miard F, Nandillon R, Léger JC, Hattab-Hambli N, Scippa GS, Bourgerie S, Morabito D (2018b) Assisted phytostabilization of a multicontaminated mine technosol using biochar amendment: Early stage evaluation of biochar feedstock and particle size effects on As and Pb accumulation of two Salicaceae species (Salix viminalis and Populus euramericana). Chemosphere 194:316–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrun M, Miard F, Renouard S, Nandillon R, Scippa GS, Morabito D, Bourgerie S (2018c) Effect of Fe-functionalized biochar on toxicity of a technosol contaminated by Pb and As: sorption and phytotoxicity tests. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(33):33678–33690

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrun M, Miard F, Nandillon R, Scippa GS, Bourgerie S, Morabito D (2019) Biochar effect associated with compost and iron to promote Pb and As soil stabilization and Salix viminalis L. growth. Chemosphere 222:810–822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lima J, de Moraes Silva W, de Medeiros E, Duda G, Corrêa M, Martins Filho A, Clermont-Dauphin C, Antonino A, Hammecker C (2018) Effect of biochar on physicochemical properties of a sandy soil and maize growth in a greenhouse experiment. Geoderma 319:14–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu L, Li W, Song W, Guo M (2018) Remediation techniques for heavy metal-contaminated soils: Principles and applicability. Sci Total Environ 633:206–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu K, Yang X, Gielen G, Bolan N, Ok Y, Niazi N, Xu S, Yuan G, Chen X, Zhang X, Liu D, Song Z, Liu X, Wang H (2017) Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the mobility and redistribution of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn) in contaminated soil. J Environ Manage 186:285–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal BK, Suzuki KT (2002) Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58(1):201–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meng J, Tao M, Wang L, Liu X, Xu J (2018) Changes in heavy metal bioavailability and speciation from a Pb-Zn mining soil amended with biochars from co-pyrolysis of rice straw and swine manure. Sci Total Environ 633:300–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee A, Zimmerman A, Hamdan R, Cooper W (2014) Physicochemical changes in pyrogenic organic matter (biochar) after 15 months of field aging. Solid Earth 5(2):693–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie C, Yang X, Niazi NK, Xu X, Wen Y, Rinklebe J, Ok YS, Xu S, Wang H (2018) Impact of sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar on heavy metal availability and microbial activity: a field study. Chemosphere 200:274–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nigussie A, Kissi E, Misganaw M, Ambaw G (2012) Effect of biochar application on soil properties and nutrient uptake of lettuces (Lactuca sativa) grown in chromium polluted soils. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 12(3):369–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norini MP, Thouin H, Miard F, Battaglia-Brunet F, Gautret P, Guégan R, Le Forestier L, Morabito D, Bourgerie S, Motelica-Heino M (2019) Mobility of Pb, Zn, Ba, As and Cd toward soil pore water and plants (willow and ryegrass) from a mine soil amended with biochar. J Environ Manage 232:117–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panagos P, Van Liedekerke M, Yigini Y, Montanarella L (2013) Contaminated sites in Europe: review of the current situation based on data collected through a European network. J Environ Public Health 2013:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park J, Choppala G, Bolan N, Chung J, Chuasavathi T (2011) Biochar reduces the bioavailability and phytotoxicity of heavy metals. Plant Soil 348(1–2):439–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puga A, Abreu C, Melo L, Beesley L (2015) Biochar application to a contaminated soil reduces the availability and plant uptake of zinc, lead and cadmium. J Environ Manage 159:86–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical Computing, Vienne, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees F, Germain C, Sterckeman T, Morel J (2015) Plant growth and metal uptake by a non-hyperaccumulating species (Lolium perenne) and a Cd-Zn hyperaccumulator (Noccaea caerulescens) in contaminated soils amended with biochar. Plant Soil 395(1–2):57–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saleem MH, Ali S, Hussain S, Kamran M, Chattha MS, Ahmad S, Aqeel M, Rizwan M, Aljarba NH, Alkahtani S, Abdel-Daim MM (2020) Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): a potential candidate for phytoremediation? Biological and economical points of view. Plants 9(4):496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shahid M, Pinelli E, Dumat C (2012) Review of Pb availability and toxicity to plants in relation with metal speciation; role of synthetic and natural organic ligands. J Hazard Mater 219–220:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi G, Cai Q (2009) Cadmium tolerance and accumulation in eight potential energy crops. Biotechnol Adv 27(5):555–561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Streubel JD, Collins HP, Garcia-Perez M, Tarara J, Granatstein D, Kruger CE (2011) Influence of contrasting biochar types on five soils at increasing rates of application. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75(4):1402–1413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su C, Jiang L, Zhang W (2014) A review on heavy metal contamination in the soil worldwide: situation, impact and remediation techniques. Environ Skept Critic 3(2):24–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Tack FM, Egene CE (2019) Potential of biochar for managing metal contaminated areas, in synergy with phytomanagement or other management options Biochar from Biomass and Waste. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 91–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaya CA, Fletcher LA, Singh S, Anyikude KU, Ross AB (2016) Phosphate and ammonium sorption capacity of biochar and hydrochar from different wastes. Chemosphere 145:518–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trakal L, Raya-Moreno I, Mitchell K, Beesley L (2017) Stabilization of metal (loid)s in two contaminated agricultural soils: comparing biochar to its non-pyrolysed source material. Chemosphere 181:150–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ginneken L, Meers E, Guisson R, Ruttens A, Elst K, Tack FM, Vangrosveld J, Diels L, Dejonghe W (2007) Phytoremediation for heavy metal-contaminated soils combined with bioenergy production. J Environ Eng Landscape Manage 15(4):227–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel W (2008) Rhizosphere processes and management in plant-assisted bioremediation (phytoremediation) of soils. Plant Soil 321(1–2):385–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu H, Zou W, Chen J, Chen H, Yu Z, Huang J, Tang H, Wei X, Gao B (2019) Biochar amendment improves crop production in problem soils: a review. J Environ Manage 232:8–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Y, Cui L, Lin Q, Li G, Zhao X (2017) Efficiency of sewage sludge biochar in improving urban soil properties and promoting grass growth. Chemosphere 173:551–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Z, Li TQ, Zhao FL, He ZL, Zhao HP, Yang XE, Wang H, Zhao J, Rafiq MT (2013) Sorption of ammonium and phosphate from aqueous solution by biochar derived from phytoremediation plants. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 14(12):1152–1161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Jean-Christophe Léger for providing the biochar, Dr Christophe Hano for providing the flax seeds and Sarah Lemêle for her technical help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sylvain Bourgerie.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lebrun, M., Miard, F., Nandillon, R. et al. Biochar Application Rate: Improving Soil Fertility and Linum usitatissimum Growth on an Arsenic and Lead Contaminated Technosol. Int J Environ Res 15, 125–134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-020-00302-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-020-00302-0

Keywords

Navigation