Skip to main content
Log in

Feasibility, in terms of efficacy and safety, of video-assisted pyeloplasty (OTAP) in the first 90 days of life

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The uretero-pelvic junction (UPJ) is the most common site of obstruction in the pediatric upper urinary tract, causing hydronephrosis. In our institution, the gold standard approach for hydronephrosis in infants is the One-Trocar-Assisted Pyeloplasty (OTAP). The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of OTAP in terms of efficacy and safety in the first 90 days of life.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all charts and long-term follow-up of 138 infants treated with OTAP; we selected and examined the ones with a defined diagnosis of severe UJPO and, thus, treated in the first 90 days of life: 28 patients. Indications for early surgery were: antero-posterior pelvic diameter (APD) > 20 mm and an obstructive pattern on renography; impaired echotexture and/or relative renal function < 40% had to be associated.

Results

Out of 23 patients, we witnessed one conversion to open surgery (4.35%) and one recurrence (4.35%) of UPJO. The mean pre-surgery APD was 35.2 mm, while the mean post-surgery APD was 17.32 mm. The mean operative time was 133 min. The mean hospitalization time was 7.71 days. The mean average of follow-up was 46.41 months (minimum 1 year).

Conclusions

Our experience suggests that OTAP is a valid and feasible technique in terms of safety and efficacy for the early treatment of very young infants affected by UPJO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hashim H, Woodhouse CJ (2012) Ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol Suppl 11:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson JC, Hynes W (1949) Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol 21:209–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Turner RM II, Fox JA, Tomaszewski JJ, Schneck FX, Docimo SG, Ost MC (2013) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants. J Urol 189(4):1503–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boylu U, Basatac C, Turan T, Onol FF, Gumus E (2012) Comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive and open pyeloplasty. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22(10):968–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lima M, Ruggeri G, Tursini S (2007) One trocar assisted pyelo-plasty (OTAP): initial experience and codification of a technique. Pediatr Med Chir 29:108–111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lima M, Ruggeri G, Messina P, Tursini S, Destro F, Mogiatti M (2015) One-trocar-assisted pyeloplasty in children: an 8-year single institution experience. Eur J Pediatr Surg 25:262–268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Babu R et al (2019) Hydronephrosis severity score: an objective assessment of hydronephrosis severity in children—a preliminary report. J  Pediatr Urol 15(1):68.e1–68.e6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Almodhen F, Jednak R, Capolicchio JP, Eassa W, Brzezinski A, El-Sherbiny M (2010) Is routine renography required after pyeloplasty? J Urol 184(3):1128–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chertin B, Rolle U, Farkas A, Puri P (2002) Does delaying pyeloplasty affect renal function in children with a prenatal diagnosis of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction? BJU Int 90:72e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chertin B, Pollack A, Koulikov D, Rabinowitz R, Hain D, Hadas-Halpren I et al (2006) Conservative treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children with antenatal diagnosis of hydronephrosis: lessons learned after 16 years of follow-up. Eur Urol 49:734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Longpre M, Nguan A, Macneily AE, Afshar K (2012) Prediction of the outcome of antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis: a multi-variable analysis. J Pediatr Urol 8:135e9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Babu R, Rathish VR, Sai V (2015) Functional outcomes of early versus delayed pyeloplasty in prenatally diagnosed pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction. J Pediatr Urol 11(63):e1–e5

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Aparicio L, Blazquez-Gomez E, Martin O, Manzanares A, Garcia-Smith N, Bejarano M, Rodo J, Ribo JM (2014) Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in patients less than 12 months old. Is the laparoscopic approach safe and feasible? J Endourol 28:906–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tan HL (1999) Laparoscopic Anderson–Hynes dismembered pyelo-plasty in children. J Urol 162:1045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Piaggio LA, Franc-Guimond J, Noh PH, Wehry M, Figueroa TE, Barthold J et al (2007) Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery. J Urol 178(4 Pt 2):1579–1583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fuchs J, Luithle T, Warmann SW, Haber P, Blumenstock G, Szavay P (2009) Laparoscopic surgery on upper urinary tract in children younger than 1 year: technical aspects and functional outcome. J Urol 182:1561e8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hao G, Xiao J, Yang P, Shen H (2013) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty: single-center experience in China. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(1):38–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, Guazzoni G, Buffi N, Peters CA (2014) Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 65:430–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobson DL, Shannon R, Johnson EK, Gong EM, Liu DB, Flink CC, Meyer T, Cheng EY, Lindgren BW (2019) Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: an updated series. J Urol 201(5):1005–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niel Di Salvo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No competing financial interests exist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lima, M., Di Salvo, N., Portoraro, A. et al. Feasibility, in terms of efficacy and safety, of video-assisted pyeloplasty (OTAP) in the first 90 days of life. J Ped Endosc Surg 1, 107–112 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-019-00024-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42804-019-00024-x

Keywords

Navigation