Skip to main content
Log in

IN DEFENSE OF A CONSTRUCTIVE, INFORMATION-BASED APPROACH TO DECISION THEORY

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the middle of this century, the dominant prescriptive approach to decision theory has been a deductive viewpoint which is concerned with axioms of rational preference and their consequences. After summarizing important problems with the preference primitive, this paper argues for a constructive approach in which information is the foundation for decision-making. This approach poses comparability of uncertain acts as a question rather than an assumption. It is argued that, in general, neither preference nor subjective probability can be assumed given, and that these need to be generated by using the relevant information available to the decision-agent in a given situation. A specific constructive model is discussed and illustrated with a real example from this viewpoint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackoff, R.L.: 1962, Scientific Method: Optimizing Applied Research Decisions, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allais, M.: 1953, ‘Le Comportement de L'homme Rationel le Risque: Critique des Postulates et Axiomes de L'ecole Americaine’, Econometrica, 21, 503–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J.: 1986, ‘Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System’, in R.M. Hogarth and M.W. Reder (Eds.), Rational Choice, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. S385-S399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernoulli, D.: 1738, ‘Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensura Sortis’, Commentarii Academiae Scientiarium Imperialis Petropolitanae, 5, 175–192. English translation by L. Sommer: Econometrica, 22 (1954): 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1950, Logical Foundations of Probability, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Second edition 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, H.: 1954, ‘Rational Selection of Decision Functions’, Econometrica, 22, 422–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C.W.: 1961, Prediction and Optimal Decision, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Finetti, B.: 1937, ‘La Prévision ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives’, Annales de L'Institut Henri Poincaré, 7, 1–68. English translation by H.E. Kyburg in H.E. Kyburg and H.E. Smokler (Eds.), Studies in Subjective Probability, New York: Wiley, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W. (Ed.): 1992, Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications, New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, D.: 1961, ‘Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1964, Decision and Value Theory, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1986, ‘The Axioms of Subjective Probability’ (with comments), Statistical Science, 1, 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1988a, Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C.: 1988b, ‘Foundations of Risk Measurement’, in Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, 8, 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. and LaValle, I.H.: 1988, ‘Context-Dependent Choice with Nonlinear and Nontransitive Preferences’, Econometrica, 56, 1221–1239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, I.J.: 1950, Probability and the Weighting of Evidence, London: Griffith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H.: 1961, Theory of Probability, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1979, ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, Econometrica, 47, 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa, H.: 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M.: 1921, A Treatise on Probability, London: Macmillan. Reprinted second edition: Harper and Row Torchbooks, New York (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, B.O.: 1940, ‘The Axioms and Algebra of Intuitive Probability’, Annals of Mathematics, 41, 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Suppes, P., and Tversky, A.: 1971, Foundations of Measurement, Vol. I, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P.: 1971, ‘Reversals of Preferences between Bids and Choices in Gambling Decisions’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H.: 1957, Games and Decisions, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M.J. and Schmeidler, D.: 1992, ‘A More Robust Definition of Subjective Probability’, Econometrica, 60, 745–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M.: 1959, Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milnor, J.: 1954, ‘Games Against Nature’, in R.M. Thrall and C.H. Coombs (Eds.), Decision Processes, Ch. IV, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munier, B.R.: 1995, ‘Complexity and Strategic Decision under Uncertainty. How Can We Adapt the Theory?’ in B.R. Munier (Ed.), Markets, Risk and Money, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Original French version published in 1986.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J.W., Raiffa, H. and Schaifer, R.: 1964, ‘The Foundations of Decisions under Uncertainty: An Elementary Exposition’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 59, 353–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J.: 1982, ‘A Theory of Anticipated Utility’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A.: 1965, ‘Game Theory and Human Conflicts’, in E.B. McNeil (Ed.), The Nature of Human Conflict, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P.: 1931, The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co. New York: The Humanities Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B.: 1971, ‘A Conceptual Framework for a Prescriptive Theory of “Decision-Aid”,’ in M.K. Starr and M. Zeleny (Eds.), Multiple Criteria Decision Making, New York: North-Holland.

  • Savage, L.J.: 1954, The Foundations of Statistics, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: 1959, ‘Theories of Decision Making in Economica and Behavioral Science’, American Economic Review, 49, 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.: 1986, ‘Rationality in Psychology and Economics’, in R.M. Hogarth and M.W. Reder (Eds.), Rational Choice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. S209-S224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.F., Benson, P.G. and Curley S.P.: 1991, ‘Belief, Knowledge, and Uncertainty: A Cognitive Perspective on Subjective Probability’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 291–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1986, ‘Rational Choice and the Framing Decisions’, in R.M. Hogarth and M.W. Reder (Eds.), Rational Choice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. S251-S278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D.: 1992, ‘Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty’, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J. and Morgenstern, O.: 1947, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd Ed., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M.E.: 1987, ‘The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk’, Econometrica, 55, 95–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, M.R.: 1992, ‘An Information-Expectation Framework for Decisions under Uncertainty’, Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz, M.R. and Chatterjee, S.: 1994, ‘An Information-Based Model for Subjective Probability’, American Journal of Mathematical And Management Sciences, 14, 103–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

YILMAZ, M.R. IN DEFENSE OF A CONSTRUCTIVE, INFORMATION-BASED APPROACH TO DECISION THEORY. Theory and Decision 43, 21–44 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004977910644

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004977910644

Navigation