Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparison of Methods for Deriving Solute Flux Rates Using Long-Term Data from Streams in the Mirror Lake Watershed

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calculation of chemical flux rates for streams requires integration of continuous measurements of discharge with discrete measurements of solute concentrations. We compared two commonly used methods for interpolating chemistry data (time-averaging and flow-weighting) to determine whether discrepancies between the two methods were large relative to other sources of error in estimating flux rates. Flux rates of dissolved Si and SO4 2- were calculated from 10 years of data (1981-1990) for the NW inlet and outlet of Mirror Lake and for a 40-day period (March 22 to April 30, 1993) during which we augmented our routine (weekly) chemical monitoring with collection of daily samples. The time-averaging method yielded higher estimates of solute flux during high-flow periods if no chemistry samples were collected correponding to peak discharge. Concentration-discharge relationships should be used to interpolate stream chemistry during changing flow conditions if chemical changes are large. Caution should be used in choosing the appropriate time-scale over which data are pooled to derive the concentration-discharge regressions because the model parameters (slope and intercept) were found to be sensitive to seasonal and inter-annual variation. Both methods approximated solute flux to within 2-10% for a range of solutes that were monitored during the intensive sampling period. Our results suggest that errors arising from interpolation of stream chemistry data are small compared with other sources of error in developing watershed mass balances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bukaveckas, P.A., Likens, G.E., Buso, D.C. and Winter, T.: 1993, Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 25, 419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.W., Gherini, S.A., Peters, N.E., Murdock, P.S., Newton, R.M. and Goldstein, R.A.: 1984, Water Resour. Res. 20, 1875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clair, T.A. and Ehrman, J.M.: 1996, Limnol. Oceanogr. 41, 921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, C.T., Likens, G.E., Hedin, L.O., Eaton, J.S. and Bormann, F.H.: 1989, Environ Sci. Technol. 23, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federer, C.A., Flynn, L.D., Martin, C.W., Hornbeck, J.W. and Pierce, R.S.: 1990, Thirty years of Hydrometeorologic Data at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, New Hampshire, USDA Forest Service, General Tech. Report NE-141.

  • Houle, D., Carignan, R., Lachance, M. and Dupont, J.: 1995, Limnol. Oceanogr. 40, 710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A.: 1979, Water Resour. Res. 15, 1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBaugh, J.W. and Winter, T.C.: 1984, Limnol. Oceanogr. 29, 322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G.B., Driscoll, C.T. and Fuller, R.D.: 1988, Water Resour. Res. 24, 659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G.E., Bormann, F.H., Pierce, R.S., Eaton, J.S. and Johnson, N.M.: 1977, Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G.E. (ed.): 1985, An Ecosystem Approach to Aquatic Ecology: Mirror Lake and its Environment, Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G.E., Eaton, J.S., Johnson, N.M. and Pierce, R.S.: 1985, ‘Flux and Balance of Water and Chemicals’, in G.E. Likens (ed.), An Ecosystem Approach to Aquatic Ecology: Mirror Lake and its Environment, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 135–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G.E.: 1992, The Ecosystem Approach: Its Use and Abuse. Excellence in Ecology, Vol. 3. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf-Luhe, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M.J., Foster, N.W., Shepard, J.P. and Morrison, I.K.: 1992, Can. J. For. Res. 22, 457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M.J., Raynal, D.J. and Driscoll, C.T.: 1996, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 88, 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardo, L.H., Driscoll, C.T. and Likens, G.E.: 1995, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 85, 1659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualls, R.G., Haines, B.L. and Swank, W.T.: 1991, Ecology 72, 254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheider, W.A., Moss, J.J. and Dillon, P.J.: 1979, ‘Measurement and Uses of Hydraulic and Nutrient Budgets’, in Lake Restoration, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Report 440/5–79–001, Minneapolis, pp. 77–83.

  • Schindler, D.W., Newbury, R.W., Beaty, K.G. and Campbell, P.: 1976, J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 33, 2526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollenweider, R.A.: 1968, Scientific Fundamentals of the Eutrophication of Lakes and Flowing Waters, with Particular Reference to Nitrogen and Phosphorus as Factors in Eutrophication. Water Management Research, Org. Ecol. Coop. Dev. (Paris) Tech Report DAS/RSI/68.27. 159 pp.

  • Windolf, J., Jeppesen, E., Jensen, J.P. and Kristensen, P.: 1996. Biogeochemistry 33, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T.C.: 1981, Water Resour. Bull. 17, 82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T.C., Eaton, J.S. and Likens, G.E.: 1989, Water Resour. Bull. 25, 991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, T.C. and Woo, M.: 1990, ‘Hydrology of Lakes and Wetlands’, in M.G. Wolman and H.C. Riggs (eds.), Surface Water Hydrology, Geological Society of America, Boulder, Colorado, pp. 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bukaveckas, P., Likens, G., Winter, T. et al. A Comparison of Methods for Deriving Solute Flux Rates Using Long-Term Data from Streams in the Mirror Lake Watershed. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 105, 277–293 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005018030515

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005018030515

Navigation