Skip to main content
Log in

Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation

  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the practice of "co-participant completion" in Japanese conversation, and explores what kinds of resources are mobilized to provide the opportunity to complete another participant's utterance-in-progress. It suggests the following observations as potential characteristics of Japanese co-participant completion: (i) Syntactically-defined two-part formats (e.g. [If X] + [then Y]) may not play as prominent a role as in English; (ii) The majority of cases of co-participant completion take the form of 'terminal item completion;' (iii) Locally emergent structures like 'contrast' and 'list' as well as 'unprojected' features of turn construction often play an important role in enhancing the opportunity for completing another participant's utterance-in-progress. The article then discusses the implications of these findings for the investigation of the mutual bearing of grammar and social interaction. In particular, the discussion focuses on what we can learn from the practice of co-participant completion about how projection of turn-shapes is accomplished in Japanese conversation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Falk, Jane. (1980). The conversational duet. Proceedings of the 6th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 507-514. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, Kathleen. (1992). The interactive achievement of a sentence: Joint production in therapeutic discourse. Discourse Processes 15: 207-228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Cecilia E. and Thompson, Sandra A. (1996). Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 134-184. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Barbara A., Hayashi, Makoto and Jasperson, Robert. (1996). Resources and repair: A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 185-237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everday language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 97-121. New York: Irvington Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles. (1980). Restarts, pauses, and the achievement of a state of mutual gaze at turn-beginning. Sociological Inquiry 50: 272-302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles. (1981). Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles. (1989). Turn construction and conversational organization. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. O'Keefe and E. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 2, Paradigm exemplars, pp. 88-102. Newbury: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles. (1995). Sentence construction within interaction. In U.M. Quasthoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication, pp. 198-219. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles. (1996). Transparent vision. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 370-404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. (1987). Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interative organization of assessments. IPrA papers in pragmatics 1: 1-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Charles and Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, pp. 147-189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness. (1980). Processes of mutual monitoring implicated in the production of description sequences. Sociological Inquiry 50: 303-317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Marjorie Harness and Goodwin, Charles. (1987). Children's arguing. Language, Gender, and Sex in Comparative Perspective, In S. Philips, S. Steele and C. Tanz, pp. 200-248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, Makoto and Mori, Junko. (1998). Co-construction in Japanese revisited: We do “finish each other's sentences”. In N. Akaatsuka and S. Iwasaki (Eds.), Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 7, pp. 77-93. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Gene H. (1987). Collaborative Turn Sequences: Sentence Construction and Social Action. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Irvine.

  • Lerner, Gene H. (1991). On the syntax of sentence-in-progress. Language in Society 20: 441-458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Gene H. (1996a). On the "semi-permeable' character of grammatical units in conversation: Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 238-276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Gene H. (1996b). Finding “face” in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 59: 303-321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Gene H. and Takagi, Tomoyo. (1999). On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 49-75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani, Nobuko. (1993). Kyoowa kara taiwa e. Nihongogaku 12(4): 4-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori, Junko. (1996). Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement: The Use of Connective Expressions in Japanese Conversations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Thompson, Sandra A. (Eds.) (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, Elinor, Schieffelin, Bambi and Platt, Martha. (1979). Propositions across utterances. In E. Ochs and B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental Pragmatics, pp. 251-268. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, Tsuyoshi and Thompson, Sandra A. (1995). What can conversation tell us about syntax? In P. Davis (Ed.), Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Modes, pp. 213-271. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono, Tsuyoshi and Thompson, Sandra A. (1996). Interaction and syntax in the structure of conversational discourse. In E. Hovy and D. Scott (Eds.), Computational and Conversational Discourse: Burning Issues-An Interdisciplinary Account, pp. 67-96. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, Tsuyoshi and Yoshida, Eri. (1996). A study of co-construction in Japanese: We don't “finish each other's sentences”. In N. Akatsuka, S. Iwasaki and S. Strauss (Eds.) Japanese/ Korean Linguistics, Vol. 5, pp. 115-130. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, Harvey. (1992). Lectures on Conversation. 2 volumes. Edited by Gail Jefferson, with Introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. and Jefferson, Gail. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696-735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, Emanuel A., Ochs, Elinor and Thompson, Sandra A. (1996). Introduction. In E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar, pp. 1-51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Susan and Kawanishi, Yumiko. (1996). Assessment strategies in Japanese, Korean, and American English. In N. Akatsuka, S. Iwasaki and S. Strauss (Eds.) Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 5, pp. 149-166. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szatrowski, Polly. (1993). Nihongo no danwa no koozoo bunseki - Kanyuu no danwa no sutoratejii no koosatsu (Structure of Japanese conversation: Invitation strategies). Tokyo: Kuroshio. Szatrowski, Polly. (1996). When do Japanese speakers co-construct utterances? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Chicago, Illinois, March, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Hiroko. (1996). Language, Culture and Social Interaction: A Comparison of Turn Taking in Japanese and Anglo/American English. Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford.

  • Tanaka, Hiroko. (forthcoming a). Turn-projection in Japanese and Anglo/American English talk-in-interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction.

  • Tanaka, Hiroko. (forthcoming b). Turn-Taking in Japanese and Anglo/American English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayashi, M. Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation. Human Studies 22, 475–499 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492027060

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492027060

Navigation