Skip to main content
Log in

The Environmental Implications of Soil Erosion in the United States

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soil erosion has both on-farm and off-farm impacts. Reductionof soil depth can impair the land’s productivity, and thetransport of sediments can degrade streams, lakes, and estuaries. Since 1933, soil conservation policies have existedin the United States. Originally they focused on the on-farmbenefits of keeping soil on the land and increasing net farmincome. Beginning in the 1980s, however, policy goalsincreasingly included reductions in off-site impacts of erosion.As a consequence of conservation efforts associated withexplicit U.S. government policies, total soil erosion between1982 and 1992 was reduced by 32% and the sheet and rillerosion rate fell from an average of 4.1 tons per acre per yearin 1982 to 3.1 tons per acre in 1992 while the wind erosion ratefell from an average of 3.3 tons per acre per year to 2.4 tonsper acre per year over the same period. Still, soil erosion isimposing substantial social costs. These costs are estimated tobe about $37.6 billion annually. To further reduce soil erosionand thereby mitigate its social costs, there are a number ofpolicy options available to induce farmers to adopt conservationpractices including education and technical assistance, financial assistance, research and development, land retirement, andregulation and taxes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, J., Baumgardner, G., Turner, D. and Lee, J.: 1996, ‘Carbon Dynamics of the Conservation and Wetland Reserve Programs’, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 51, 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, D., Cook, Z. and Fuglie, K.: 1995, ‘Voluntary versus Mandatory Agricultural Policies to Protect Water Quality: Adoption of Nitrogen Testing in Nebraska’, Review of Agricultural Economics 17, 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell, M. and Shoemaker, R.: 1993, Adoption of Pest Management Strategies Under Varying Environmental Conditions, Technical Bulletin 1927, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosswhite, W. and Sandretto, C.: 1991, ‘Trends in Resource Protection Policies in Agriculture’, Agricultural Resources: Cropland, Water, and Conservation Situation and Outlook Report, Economic Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, T., Bischoff, J., Henning, L. and Pflueger, B.: 1995, ‘Case Study of the Potential Economic and Environmental Effects of the Water Quality Incentive Program and the Integrated Crop anagement Program: Preliminary Findings’, paper presented at annual meeting of the Great Plains Economics Committee, Great Plains Agricultural Council, Kansas City, MO.

  • Dudal, R.: 1982, ‘Land Degradation in aWorld Perspective’, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 37, 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. and Dabney, S.: 1995, ‘Agricultural Tillage Systems: Water Erosion and Sedimentation’, Farming for a Better Environment, Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franzmeier, D.: 1990, ‘Soil Landscapes and Erosion Processes’, in: W. Larson, G. Foster, R. Allmaras,and C. Smith (eds), Proceedings of Soil Erosion and Productivity Workshop, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhart, D., Johnson, H., Mayeux, H. and Polley, H.: 1994, ‘The CRP Increases Soil Organic Carbon’, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 49, 488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hefferman, W.: 1984, ‘Assumptions of the Adoption/Diffusion Model and Soil Conservation’, in: B. English, J. Maetzold, B. Holding and E. Heady (eds), Argricultural Technology and Resource Conservation, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich, R.: 1991, ‘Soil Erosion and Conservation Policies in the United States’, in: N. Hanley (ed.), Farming and the Countryside: An Economic Analysis of External Costs and Benefits, CAB International Publishers, Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, B.: 1987, Legal Authorities for Federal (USDA). State, and Local Soil and Water Conservation Activities: Background for the Second RCA Appraisal, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huzsar, P. and Piper, S.: 1986, ‘Estimating Offsite Costs of Wind Erosion in New Mexico’, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 41, 414–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneese, A. and Bower, B.: 1968, ‘Standards, Charges, and Equity’, Managing Water Quality: Economics, Technology, Institutions, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, R.: 1990. ‘Soil Erosion and Land Degradation: The Global Risks’, Advances in Soil Science 11,128–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Libby, L.: 1982, ‘Interaction of RCA with State and Local Conservation Programs’, in H. Halcrow, E. Heady and M. Cotner (eds.), Soil Conservation Institutions, and Incentives, Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, M., Schumacher, T., Jones, A. and Gantzer, C.: 1992, ‘Productivity Index Model for Selected Soils in North Central United States’, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 47, 491–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, A.: 1941, Early American Soil Conservationists,Miscellaneous Publication Number 449, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magleby, R., Sandretto, C., Crosswhite, W. and Osborn, T.: 1995, Soil Erosion and Conservation in the United States, AIB-718, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missouri Management Systems Evaluation Area: 1995, A Farming Systems Water Quality Report, Research and Education Report, Missouri MSEA.

  • National Research Council: 1993, Soil and Water Quality, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. and Schertz, L.: 1996, Provisions of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washinton, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, P.: 1991, ‘Why Farmers Adopt Production Technology’, in Crop Residue Management for Conservation, Proceedings of a National Conference, Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, P. and O’Keefe, G.: 1995, ‘Farmers and Water Quality: Local Answers to Local Issues’, Draft Report submitted to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, DC.

  • Office of Technology Assessment: 1990, Beneath the Bottom Line: Agricultural Approaches to Reduce Agrichemical Contamination of Groundwater, OTA-F-418, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, T.: 1996, ‘Conservation’, Provisions of the Federal Agricultural Improvement Act of 1996, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, S. and Lee, L.: 1989, Estimating the Offsite Household Damage from Wind Erosion in the Western United States, Staff Report 8926, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, W.: 1982, ‘History of Soil Conservation, Institutions and Incentives’, Soil Conservation Society of America, Ankeny, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichelderfer, K.: 1990, ‘Land Stewards or Polluters? The Treatment of Farmers in the Evaluation Environmental and Agricultural Policy’, a paper presented at the conference Is Environmental Quality Good for Business?, Washington DC.

  • Ribaudo, M.: 1989, Water Quality Benefits from the Conservation Reserve Program, AER-606, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo, M., Colacicco, D., Langner, L., Piper, S. and Schaible, G.: 1990, tural Resources and Users Benefit from the Conservation Reserve Program AER-627, nomic Research Service, U.S. department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribaudo, M. and Hellerstein, D.: 1992, Estimating Water Quality Benefits: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. TB-1808, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha, A., Love, H. A. and Schwart, R.: 1994, ‘Adoption of Emerging Technologies Under Output Uncertainty’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, 836–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohbehn, R.: 1986, An Economic Analysis of USDA Erosion Control Programs: A New Perspective, AER-560, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment: 1990, Beneath the Bottom Line: Agricultural Approaches to Reduce Agrichemical Contamination of Groundwater, OTA-F-418, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uri, N.: 1999, Conservation Tillage in U.S. Agriculture: Environmental, Economic and Policy Issues, The Haworth Press, Inc., Binghamton, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Es, J.: 1984, ‘Dilemmas in the Soil and Water Conservation Behavior of Farmers’, in: B. English, J. Maetzold, B. Holding, and E. Heady (eds), Agricultural Technology and Resource Conservation, Iowa State University Press, Ames.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zison, S., Haven, K. and Mills, W.: 1977, Water Quality Assessment: A Screening Method for Nondesignated 208 Areas, Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uri, N.D. The Environmental Implications of Soil Erosion in the United States. Environ Monit Assess 66, 293–312 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006333329653

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006333329653

Navigation