Skip to main content
Log in

Consumer Bankruptcy in the United States: A Study of Alleged Abuse and of Local Legal Culture

  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes certain central aspects of the operation of the consumer bankruptcy system in the United States. It combines government data with the investigators' empirical data from two large studies done over a decade to explore two types of questions. The first area of investigation relates specifically to bankruptcy policy. The object is to identify the categories of persons principally served by the consumer bankruptcy system and to determine if suggestions of widespread abuse of that system by debtors are well-founded. The paper reports that the system is used primarily by the middle-class. It also reports that there is no evidence of widespread abuse. The second area of investigation is explanation of differences in the operation of the system in different regions of the country, differences that have persisted over twenty years despite major changes in legal rules and economic conditions. The paper argues that these differences are not explicable in terms of formal legal rules or a simple economic model and that a better explanation of the data is that the differences are the product of a "local legal culture" in each region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Church, T. (1978). Justice delayed: The pace of litigation in urban trial courts. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, T. (1981). Who sets the pace of litigation in urban trial courts? Judicature, 65, 76-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, T. (1985). Examining local legal culture-Practitioner attitudes in four criminal courts. American Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1985, 449-518.

  • Collier on Bankruptcy (1992). 7 Vols. 15th ed. New York: Mathew Bender.

  • Creditors Bankruptcy Service (1996). Consumer bankruptcy filings: Up, up, and away. CBS Advantage: Bankruptcy Recovery News, Second quarter.

  • Kritzer, H., Zemans, F., & Marshall, L. (1992). Controlling litigation and local legal culture, disputes processing research program. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin. Working Paper 11-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopucki, L. M. (1989). The demographics of bankruptcy practice. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 63, 289-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neustadter, G. (1986). When lawyer and client meet: Observations of interviewing and counseling behavior in the consumer bankruptcy law office. Buffalo Law Review, 35, 177-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdue University Credit Research Center (1982). Consumer bankruptcy study, 2 vols. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Krannert Graduate School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Study of data reveals change (1996). The Thirteen Connection, Spring, p. 1.

  • Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1986). Folklore and facts: A preliminary report from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 60, 293-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1988). Laws, models, and real people: Choice of chapter in personal bankruptcy. Law and Social Inquiry, 13, 661-680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1989). As we forgive our debtors: Bankruptcy and consumer credit in America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1994a). Consumer debtors ten years later: A financial comparison of consumer bankrupts 1981-1991. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 68, 121-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1994b). The persistence of local legal culture: Twenty years of evidence from the Federal Bankruptcy Courts. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 17, 801-865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, T. A., Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1995). Bankruptcy and the family. Marriage and Family Review, 21, 193-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of the Census (1992). Statistical abstract of the United States, 112th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Bureau of the Census (1993). Statistical abstract of the United States, 113th ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Congress General Accounting Office (1992). Bankruptcy administration: Justification lacking for continuing two parallel programs. GAO/GGD-92-133. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Courts Administrative Office (1996). Press release, May 18.

  • Vernon (1993). Texas Property Code Annotated. Kansas City, MO: Vernon Law Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E., & Westbrook, J. L. (1996). The law of debtors and creditors: Text, cases and problems, 3rd ed. Boston: Little & Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, W. C. (1994). The ideal of individualized justice: Consumer bankruptcy as consumer protection, and consumer protection in consumer bankruptcy. American Bankruptcy Law Journal, 68, 397-417.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sullivan, T.A., Warren, E. & Westbrook, J.L. Consumer Bankruptcy in the United States: A Study of Alleged Abuse and of Local Legal Culture. Journal of Consumer Policy 20, 223–268 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006826006249

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006826006249

Keywords

Navigation