Abstract
The present study examines gender differences in children's encoding of gender-connotation from words. The release from proactive interference method was used to measure gender-connotation encoding. Forty-eight third-grade children attending a public elementary school serving a predominantly White middle-socioeconomic-status community participated and were presented with stimulus words in print. The design of the study can be characterized as a two (gender) by two (condition: control vs. experimental) by four (trials) factorial. Results revealed reliable proactive interference buildup and release for gender-connotation for girls, but not for boys. This new finding, taken together with extant research, demonstrates that while both boys and girls have the ability to encode gender-connotation from aurally presented words, the spontaneous activation of gender-connotation attributes with print is not guaranteed for boys.
REFERENCES
Barnett, A. J. (1976). Differential encoding as a function of semantic polarity and form of visual stimulus presentation. Memory and Cognition, 4, 139–143.
Cox, D., & Waters, H. S. (1986). Sex differences in the use of organization strategies: A developmental analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 18–37.
Douglas, J. D.,& Corsale, K. (1977). The effects of mode and rate of presentation on evaluative encoding in children's memory. Child Development, 48, 46–50.
Goggin, J., & Wickens, D. D. (1971). Proactive interference and language changes in short term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 453–458.
Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Halpern, D. F., & Wright, T. M. (1996). A process-oriented model of cognitive sex differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 3–24.
Jones, M. S., Yokoi, L., Johnson, D. J., Lum, S., Cafaro, T., & Kee, D. W. (1996). Sex differences in the effectiveness of elaborative strategy use: Knowledge access comparisons. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 401–409.
Kail, R. V., Jr., & Levine, L. E. (1976). Encoding processes and sex-role preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 21, 256–263.
Kail, R. V., Jr., & Schroll, J. T. (1974). Evaluative and taxonomic encoding in children's memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 426–437.
Kail, R. V., Jr., & Siegel, A. W. (1977). The development of mnemonic encoding in children: From perception to abstraction. In R. V. Kail, Jr., and J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspective on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 61–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kee, D. W., Nakayama, S. Y., Cervantes, M., & Osaze, J. D. (1984). Automatic conceptual encoding of printed verbal material: Assessment of population differences. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 9, 74–83.
Levy, G. D. (1994a). High and low gender schematic children's release from proactive interference. Sex Roles. 30, 93–108.
Levy, G. D. (1994b). Aspects of preschooler's comprehension of indoor and outdoor gendertyped toys. Sex Roes. 30, 391–405.
Martin, C. L. (1991). The role of cognition in understanding gender effects. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 23, pp. 113–149). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Martin, C. L. (1993). New directions for investigating children's gender knowledge. Developmental Review. 13, 184–204.
Mills, C. J., & Tyrrell, D. J. (1983). Sex-stereotypic encoding and release from proactive interference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 772–781.
Nakayama, S. Y., & Kee, D. W. (1980). Automatic encoding of superordinate and subordinate taxonomic categories in different populations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 386–393.
Nakayama, S. Y., & Kee, D. W. (1987). Development of elaboration and organization in different socioeconomic-status and ethnic populations. In M. A. McDaniel and M. Pressley (Eds.), Imagery and related mnemonic processes (pp. 239–256). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Schneider, W., & Pressley, M. (1997). Memory development between two and twenty (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shelton, J. R.,& Caramazza, A. (1999). Deficits in lexical and semantic processing: Implications for models of normal language. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 5–27.
Signorella, M. L., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1993). Developmental differences in children's gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 13, 147–183.
Signorella, M. L., Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (1994, April). A meta-analysis of children's memories for own-sex and other-sex information. Paper presented at the 13th Biennial Conference on Human Development, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Waters, H. S., & Andreassen, C. (1983). Children's use of memory strategies under instruction. In J. R. Levin and M. Pressely (Eds.), Cognitive strategy research: Psychological foundations. New York/B: Springer-Verlag.
Waters, H. S., & Schreiber, L. L. (1991). Sex differences in elaborative strategies: A developmental analysis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 319–335.
Wickens, D. D. (1970). Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning. Psychological Review, 1970, 1–15.
Whitney, P., Kellas, G., & Ferraro, F. R. (1990). Reading ability and semantic processing: Isolating speed of access. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 479–485.
Williams, J., Williams, D. V., & Blumberg, E. L. (1973). Visual and aural learning in urban children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 353–359.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perez, S.M., Kee, D.W. Girls Not Boys Show Gender-Connotation Encoding from Print. Sex Roles 42, 439–447 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007054406295
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007054406295