Skip to main content
Log in

Facing strategic narratives: In which we argue interactive effectiveness

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multiple commons is an important context in a world facing the eco-challenge. The platform for land use negotiation is a perspective concerning the good governance of the multiple commons. Platforms are devices or procedures for social learning and negotiation about effective collective action. They create collective decision making capacity at eco-system levels at which critical ecological services need to be managed. Taking platforms seriously as an option for designing a more sustainable society assumes a belief in the human capacity to engage in collective action. Unfortunately, human thinking about humans is dominated by perspectives that emphasize either technical solutions to given human ends, or perspectives that emphasize the selfish nature of human ends. This article focuses especially on the latter: the strategic narratives that have become dominant as society increasingly becomes designed on economic principles. The paper seeks to explain the dominance of strategic narratives and provides social science evidence for alternative perspectives. It concludes with cornerstones for an alternative narrative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bawden, R. J. and R. Packam (1991). “Systems praxis in the education of the agricultural systems practitioner. Richmond (NSW): University of Western Sidney-Hawkesbury.” Paper presented at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences. Östersund, Sweden.

  • Berkes, F. and C. Folke, eds. (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S. D. (1995). “Contending coalitions in participatory technology development: Challenges for the New Orthodoxy. Norwich: University of Development Studies.” Expanded version of a paper prepared for the PTD Workshop on “The Limits to Participation,” organized by Intermediate Technology at the Institute for Education, Bedford Way, London.

  • Brand, A. (1990). The Force of Reason: An Introduction to Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action. Sidney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. and J. Law (1989). “On the construction of sociotechnical networks: Content and context revisited,” Knowledge in Society: Studies in the Sociology of Science Past and Present 8: 57–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. (1994). Landcare. Communities Shaping the Land and the Future. St. Leonards (Australia): Allan and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The Web of Life. A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. London: Harper and Collins. Paperback by London: Flamingo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel (1996). The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. and J. Scholes (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chicester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1988). “Social capital in the creation of Human capital,” American Journal of Sociology 94(supplement): S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangbégnon, C. (1998). Collective Action for Regenerative Natural Resource Management. Case Studies from Benin. Wageningen: Agricultural University, published doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, W. T. (1992). Environmental Science Theory: Concepts and Methods in a One-world Problem-oriented Paradigm. Amsterdam: University of Leyden. Doctoral dissertation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourojeanni, A. (1998). Management Procedures for Sustainable Development (applicable to municipalities, micro-regions and river basins). Santiago de Chile: UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Division of Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, P. G. H. and M. Salomon (1997). Facilitating Innovation for Development. A RAAKS Resource Box. Amsterdam: KIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1995). “Agency, institution and time-space analysis,” in D. McQuarie (ed.), Readings in Contemporary Sociological Theory: From Modernity to Post-modernity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, R. (in prep.). Platforms and Terraces. GIS as a Tool for Interactive Land Use Negotiation (prelim. title). Enschede: ITC and Wageningen: Agricultural University. Published doctoral dissertation in preparation.

  • Gunderson, L. H., C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light eds. (1995). Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System. A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). “The tragedy of the commons,” Science 162: 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden Order. How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Reading (MA): Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1995). 'What barriers? What bridges?” in L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light (eds.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York: Colombia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (1998). “The unfinished symphony. An evolutionary perspective on the conception of sustainable development.” Paper presented to the 2nd Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics. Geneva, 4–7 March, 1998.

  • Jennings, N. R., K. Sycara, and M. Woolridge (1998). “A roadmap to agent research and development,” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 1: 275–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1967). The Ghost in the Machine. London: Penguin Arkana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. N. (1993). Compass and Gyroscope. Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco, J. (1998). “Entering the century of the environment: A new social contract for science,” Science 279: 491–496, January 23, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarleveld, M., N. Röling and S. Seegers (1997). FASOLEARN (Facilitation of Social learning). Technical Proposal for Second Phase of the Environment and Climate RTD Programme 1997–1998. Wageningen: Agricultural University. Unpublished.

  • Maarleveld, M. (in prep.). Social Learning in Resource Management Dilemmas (working title). Wageningen: Agricultural University, to be published doctoral dissertation.

  • Maarleveld, M. and C. Dangbégnon (1999). “Managing natural resources: A social learning perspective,” Agriculture and Human Values 16(3): 267–280 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, C. and W. Liebrand (1989). “The role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation and other's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55: 369–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, D. (1996). Footprints in the Mud. Re-constructing the Diversities in Rural People's Learning Processes. Wageningen: Agricultural University. Published doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965, 1971). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1998). “Coping with tragedies of the commons.” Paper for 1998 Annual Meeting of the Association for Politics and Life Sciences, Boston, September 3–6, 1998.

  • Ostrom, E. (1990, 1991, 1992). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. and E. Schlater (1996). “The formation of property rights,” in S. S. Hanna, C. Folke, and K. G. Mäler (eds.), Rights to Nature. Ecological, Economic, Cultural, and Political Principles of Institutions for the Environment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker (1994). Rules, Games and Common Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, E. A. and W. C. Clark (1995). “Sustainable development as social learning: theoretical perspectives and practical challenges for the design of a research program,” in L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light (eds.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions (Chapter 10, pp. 428–461). New York: Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J. P. (1996). “The evolutionary theory of land rights as applied to Sub-Saharan Africa: A critical assessment,” Development and Change 27: 29–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platteau, J. P. (1998). “Distributional contingencies of dividing the commons.” Invited paper for Research School CERES Seminar “Acts of Man and Nature? Different constructions of natural and resource dynamics.” Bergen (The Netherlands), October 22–24, 1998.

  • Potters, J. (1998). Understanding the Functioning of Collective Forest Management. A Case Study on Perception and Behaviour in a Community Forest User Group in Salyan District, Western Nepal. Wageningen: Agricultural University, Dept. of Communication and Innovation Studies, MSc Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D. G. and P. J. Carnevale (1993). Negotiation in Social Conflict. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. and G. Ruivenkamp (1994). “New tools for convivial society and biotechnology.” Paper for EASA Conference, Oslo, 24–27 June. (revised March 1995).

  • Ridley, M. (1996). The Origins of Virtue. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1994). “Platforms for decision making about ecosystems,” in L. O. Fresco, L. Stroosnijder, J. Bouma, and H. van Keoulen (eds.), Future of the Land: Mobilising and Integrating Knowledge for Land Use Options (Chapter 31, pp. 386–393). Chicester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N. (1995). “Creating human platforms to manage natural resources: First results of a research programme.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Systems Oriented Research in Agriculture and Rural Development (pp. 391–395). Montpellier, France, 21–25 November 1994.

  • Röling, N. (1997). “The Soft Side of Land,” ITC Journal (3–4) (Special Congress Issue): 248–262.

  • Röling, N. and J. Jiggins (1998). “The ecological knowledge system,” in N. Röling and A. Wagemakers (eds.), Facilitating Sustainable Agriculture. Participatory Learning and Adaptive Management in Times of Environmental Uncertainty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röling, N., J. Jiggins, and C. Leeuwis (1998). “Treadmill success and failure: The challenges for FSR/E.” Paper for International symposium of the Association for FSR/E. Pretoria, South Africa, 26 November–4 December 1998.

  • Steins, N. and V. Edwards (1998). “Platforms for collective action in multiple use CPRs. Discussion.” Paper for the Panel Multiple Use CPRs, Collective Action and Platforms for Resource Use Negotiation. “Crossing Boundaries,” 7th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property. Vancouver, Canada, June 10–14, 1998.

  • Steins, N. and V. Edwards (1999). “Platforms for collective action in multiple-use common-pool resources,” Agriculture and Human Values 16(3): 241–255 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L. and J. Cruikshank (1987). Breaking the Impasse. Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. MIT-Harvard Public Disputes Program. New York: Basic Books Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarnas, R. (1991). The Passion of the Western Mind. Understanding the Ideas that Have Shaped our World View. New York: Ballentine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff, N. (1992). Learning from Gal Oya. Possibilities for Participatory Development and Post-Newtonian Social Science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upreti, B. (1998). Local conflicts and the factors that influence their resolution. Case studies of local resource conflicts in Nepal. Wageningen: Agricultural University: MAKS, unpublished MSc Thesis.

  • Van Lange, P. (1991). The Rationality and Morality of Cooperation. The Influence of Own Social Value Orientation and Perceptions of Other's Personality Characteristics on Co-operation in a Social Dilemma. Dissertation. Groningen.

  • Van Lange, P. and W. Liebrand (1989). “On perceiving morality and potency: Social values and the effects of person perception in a give-some dilemma,” European Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3: 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meegeren, P. (1997). Communicatie en maatschappelijke acceptatie van milieubeleid [Communication and public acceptance of environmental policy]. Wageningen: Agricultural University, published doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vugt, M., R. M. Meertens, and P. van Lange (1995). “Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in real-life social dilemma.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25(3): 258–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodouhé, S. (1996). Making Rural Development Work: Cultural Hybridization of Farmers' Organisations. The Adja Case in Benin. Wageningen: WAU. Published doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1995). “Patrimonial Mediation en Madagascar: L'Occupation Humaine des Aires Proteges a Madagascar; Diagnostic et Elements pour une gestion viable,” Natures, Sciences et Societes 3(2): 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webler, T., H. Kastenholz and O. Renn (1995). “Public participation and impact assessment: A social earning perspective,” Environmental Impact Assessment Review 15: 443–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, M. (1998). Discovering Common Ground. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. K. (1988). The Recent Work of Jürgen Habermas. Reason, Justice and Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Röling, N., Maarleveld, M. Facing strategic narratives: In which we argue interactive effectiveness. Agriculture and Human Values 16, 295–308 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007595530813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007595530813

Navigation