Skip to main content
Log in

The Determinants of Innovation: R & D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional analysis of innovation has focused on the Schumpeterian hypothesis of a positive link between market power and innovation. This often includes an implicitly linear view of the innovation process, with R & D as a necessary first step. This paper widens the determinants of innovation beyond R & D to include technology transfer and networking effects, thus extending the standard Schumpeterian analysis. When tested on a dataset of c. 1300 UK manufacturing plants, R & D, technology transfer and networking are found to be substitutes in the innovation process, with the two latter intensities especially important in increasing the extent of innovation. There is no evidence that (actual) monopoly power increases the extent of innovation, but there are significant plant and sectoral effects on innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch (1993) 'Analysing Innovation Output Indicators: the US Experience', in A. Kleinknecht and D. Bain, eds., New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch (1988) 'Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis', American Economic Review, 78, 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, S. and H. Hollenstein (1996) 'Industrial Innovation in Switzerland: AModel-Based Analysis with Survey Data', in A. Kleinknecht, ed., Determinants of Innovation: The Message from New Indicators. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (1995) Innovation and Industry Evolution. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. and M. P. Feldman (1996) 'R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production', American Economic Review, 86, 630–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., R. Griffith and J. van Reenen (1995) 'Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation', Economic Journal, 105, 333–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, E. and A. Kleinknecht (1996a) 'FirmSize, Small Business Presence and Sales of Innovative Products: A Micro-Econometric Analysis', Small Business Economics, 8, 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, E. and A. Kleinknecht (1996b) 'Determinants of Innovation: A Microeconometric Analysis of Three Alternative Innovation Output Indicators', in A. Kleinknecht, ed., Determinants of Innovation: The Message from New Indicators. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugger, E. A. and B. Stuckey (1987) 'Regional Economic Structure and Innovative Behaviour in Switzerland', Regional Studies, 21, 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. and P. Trivedi (1986) 'Econometric Models Based on Count Data: Comparisons and Applications of Some Estimators', Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 25–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. and P. Trivedi (1990) 'Regression Based Tests for Over-Dispersion in the Poisson Model', Journal of Econometrics, 46, 347–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1986) 'The Theory of Technological Competition', in J. E. Stiglitz and G. F. Mathewson, eds., New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Trade and Industry (1992) Innovation, Technology and Change: Help for Business. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1991) 'Networks of Innovators: a Synthesis of Research Issues', Research Policy, 20, 499–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1957) American Capitalism. London: Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A. (1990) 'Innovation, Technological Opportunity, and Market Structure', Oxford Economic Papers, 42, 586–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. A. and C. F. Walters (1995) 'Innovative Activity over the Business Cycle', Economic Journal, 105, 916–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., A. T. Thwaites and D. Gibbs (1986) 'The Regional Dimension to Technological Change in Great Britain', in A. Amin and J. B. Goddard, eds., Technological Change, Industrial Restructuring and Regional Development, London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. I. D. and M. Trainor (1995) 'Innovations and R&D in Northern Ireland Manufacturing: A Schumpeterian Approach', Regional Studies, 29, 593–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J., B. Hall and Z. Griliches (1984) 'Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship', Econometrica, 52, 909–938.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M. and N. Schwartz (1982) Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1987) 'Measuring R&D in Small Firms: How Much Are We Missing?', Journal of Industrial Economics, 34, 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton Smith, H., K. Dickson and S. Lloyd Smith (1991) ' "There Are Two Sides to Every Story": Innovation and Collaboration Within Networks of Large and Small Firms', Research Policy, 20, 457–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. and P. Reiss (1984) 'Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure', in Z. Grilliches, ed., R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, J. H., B. Ashcroft and S. Dunlop (1996) 'Corporate Structure, Ownership and the Likelihood of Innovation', Applied Economics, 28, 737–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1984) 'Comment on Using Linked Patent and R&D Data to Measure Inter-Industry Technology Flows', in Z. Griliches, ed., R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakey, R. P., A. T. Thwaites and P. A. Nash (1980) 'The Regional Distribution of Innovative Manufacturing Establishments in Britain', Regional Studies, 14, 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S. (1997) 'Product Innovation and Small Business Growth: A Comparison of the Strategies of German, UK and Irish Companies', Small Business Economics, 9, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., B. Ashcroft, J. H. Love, S. Dunlop, H. Hofmann and K. Vogler-Ludwig (1996) Product Innovation and Development in UK, German and Irish Manufacturing, Belfast and Glasgow: Northern Ireland Economic Research Centre/Fraser of Allander Institute, University of Strathclyde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. and M. Beesley (1989) 'The Importance of Technology Transfer', in J. Barber, J. S. Metcalfe and M. Porteous, eds., Barriers to Small Firm Growth, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. L. (1991), 'The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley', Research Policy, 20, 423–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1980) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Chicago: Rand McNally,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966) Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge,Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. and R. Blundell (1986) 'An Exogeneity Test for a Simultaneous Equation TobitModel with an Application to Labor Supply', Econometrica, 54, 679–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thwaites, A. T. (1978) 'Technological Change, Mobile Plants and Regional Development', Regional Studies, 12, 445–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todtling, F. (1992) 'Technological Change at the Regional Level: the Role of Location, Firm Structure and Strategy', Environment and Planning A, 24, 1565–1584.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Love, J.H., Roper, S. The Determinants of Innovation: R & D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects. Review of Industrial Organization 15, 43–64 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007757110963

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007757110963

Navigation