Skip to main content
Log in

Marginal Rates and Elasticities of Substitution with Additive Models in DEA

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Marginal rates and elasticities of substitution are derived from the optimal slack values obtained from modified versions of additive DEA models. Projection formulas are used to ensure that all points are on the efficient frontier as required for conformance with assumptions in micro-economics. The models used differ from standard versions in that slack values are allowed to be negative as well as positive in these additive models. This makes movement possible on efficiency frontiers, where improvement in some inputs or outputs requires worsening other inputs or outputs. A new definition is therefore introduced in which efficiency is attained only if the value of the worsenings is exactly offset by the value of the improvements. This includes, but is not restricted to, the case in which all slacks must be zero for full attainment of efficiency—as in standard versions of additive models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali, I., and L. M. Seiford. (1990). “Translation Invariance in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Operations Research Letters 9, 403-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, I., W. F. Bowlin, W. W. Cooper, and T. Sueyoshi. (1996). “Part I: Models and Measures for Efficiency Evaluation in DEA. Part II: Free Disposal Hulls and MED Measures.” Journal of the Operational Research Society of Japan 39, 322-332 and 333-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, M., and R. Russell. (1989). “Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? A Comparison of Allen-Uzawa and Morishima Elasticities.” The American Economic Review, 882-888.

  • Charnes, A., andW.W. Cooper. (1961). Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, and J. Stutz. (1985a). “Foundation of Data Envelopment Analysis for Pareto-Koopmans Efficient Empirical Production Functions.” Journal of Econometrics 30, 91- 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, R. C. Morey, and J. Rousseau. (1985b). “Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in DEA.” Annals of Operations Research 2, 139-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T., D. S. P. Rao, and G. E. Battese. (1998). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Norwell, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., K. S. Park, and J. T. Pastor. (1999). “RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 11, 5-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., L. M. Seiford, and K. Tone. (1999). Data Envelopment Analysis. A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. A. K. Lovell. (1994). Production Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, and C. A. K. Lovell. (1985). The Measurement of Efficiency of Production. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 120, 253-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. I., and C. M. Harris, eds. (1996). Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, S. T., U. Passy, and L. K. Platzman (1994). “Explicit Representation of the Two-Dimensional Section of a Production Possibility Set.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 5, 161-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozmetsky, G., F. Phillips, and S. Thore. (1994). “DEA of Financial Statements: The U.S. Computer Industry.” The Journal of Productivity Analysis 2, 229-248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemhauser, G. L., A. H. G. Rinooy Kan, and M. J. Todd. (1989). Optimization-Volume 1 in Handbook of Operations Research and Management Science Series. Amsterdan, North Holland, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neralic, L. (1997). “Sensitivity in Data Envelopment Analysis for Arbitrary Perturbations of Data.” Glasnik Matematicki 32, 315-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastor, J. T. “Translation Invariance in DEA: A Generalization.” Annals of Operations Research 66, 93-102.

  • Rosen, D., C. Schaffnit, and S. C. Paradi. (1998). “Marginal Rates and Two-Dimensional Level Curves in DEA.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 9, 205-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thore, S. (1999). “Enterprise in the Information Age.” In W. E. Halal and K. B. Taylor (eds.), Twenty First Century Economics. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrall, R. M. (1999). “Measures in DEA with an Application to the Malmquist Index.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, this issue.

  • Varian, H. R. (1984). Microeconomic Analysis. New York: W. W. Norton Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, R. E. (1982). “A Preview of a Tolerance Approach to Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Programming.” Discrete Mathematics 38, 121-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, R. E. (1985). “The Tolerance Approach to Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Programming.” Management Science 31, 564-578.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, W.W., Park, D.K.S. & Ciurana, P.J.T.P. Marginal Rates and Elasticities of Substitution with Additive Models in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis 13, 105–123 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007896629828

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007896629828

Navigation