Skip to main content
Log in

RASSP Methodology Evaluation and Lessons Learned Developing IRST Signal Processor

  • Published:
Journal of VLSI signal processing systems for signal, image and video technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of a real-time infrared search and track (IRST) processing system served as a real-world test of progress toward the fourfold reduction in cycle time expected at the end of the four-year Rapid Prototyping of Application Specific Signal Processors (RASSP) program. This signal processor development tested the effectiveness of the RASSP methodology and processes and provided critical metrics to evaluate the 4X roadmap. Virtual Prototyping, a VHDL technique for validating hardware and software design before building hardware, makes the RASSP top-down methodology unique. This paper describes the 4X roadmap for cycle time improvement, our experiences with virtual prototyping and important lessons learned for improving the methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Scanlan and L. Fisher, “RASSP: The road to 4X,” Proceedings of the Second Annual RASSP Conference, pp. 33-37, July 1995. http://rassp.scra.org

  2. RASSP 18-Month Review, Sanders, a Lockheed Martin Company, Nashua, NH, February, 1995. Also available from the first author.

  3. Hughes Aircraft Company Radar Systems and McDonnell Douglas Aerospace, Advanced Design for Quality Avionics Systems, Hughes Aircraft Company, El Segundo, CA, March 1993.

  4. V. Madisetti, J. Corley, and G. Shaw, “Rapid Prototyping of Application Specific Processors: Educator/Facilitator current practice (1993) model and challenges,” Proceedings of the Second Annual RASSP Conference, pp. 59-64, July 1995. http://rassp.scra.org

  5. P.A. Bender, Jr., R. Siegel, P. Singer, H. Axelrod, and R. Sturges, “Airborne Infrared Measurement System,” July '95 IRIS Proceedings, National Infrared Information Symposium, pp. 11-13, 1995.

  6. M. Vahey and R. Cody, “Parallel processing architectures for image processing systems,” Critical Reviews, Digital Signal Processing Technology, Vol. CR57, pp. 277-290, 17-18, April 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Vahey, D. Bushman, S. Dabell, T. Ennis, P. Kalutkiewicz, W. Lee, M. McCollough, B. Nelson, K. Russell, D. Uyemura, and H. Wanke, “Real time IRST development using RASSP methodology and process,” Proceedings of the Second Annual RASSP Conference, pp. 45-51, July 1995. http://rassp.scra.org

  8. T. Carpenter and C. Miller, Graphics Processor Description VHDL Methodology: Working Document, Honeywell, Minneapolis, MN, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scanlan, L., Lee, W., Vahey, M. et al. RASSP Methodology Evaluation and Lessons Learned Developing IRST Signal Processor. The Journal of VLSI Signal Processing-Systems for Signal, Image, and Video Technology 15, 145–160 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007982607012

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007982607012

Keywords

Navigation