Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two Projects for Understanding the Mind: A Response to Morris and Richardson

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We respond to Morris and Richardson's (1995) claim that Pickering and Chater's (1995) arguments about the lack of a relation between cognitive science and folk psychology are flawed. We note that possible controversies about the appropriate uses for the two terms do not affect our arguments. We then address their claim that computational explanation of knowledge-rich processes has proved possible in the domains of problem solving, scientific discovery, and reasoning. We argue that, in all cases, computational explanation is only possible for aspects of those processes that do not make reference to general knowledge. We conclude that consideration of the issues raised by Morris and Richardson reinforces our original claim that there are two fundamentally distinct projects for understanding the mind, one based on justification, and the other on computational explanation, and that these apply to non-overlapping aspects of mental life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggleton, J.P. (1992), The Amygdala: Neurobiological Aspects of Emotion. Memory, and Mental Function. New York: Wiley-Liss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agre, P. E. & Chapman, D. (1987), ‘Pengi: An implementation of a theory of activity’, Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, PA, pp. 268-272.

  • Almor, A. & Sloman, S. (1996), ‘Is deontic reasoning special?’ Psychological Review, 103, 374-380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1993), Rules of the Mind, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R., Greeno, J.G., Kline, P.J., & Neves, D.M. (1981), ‘Acquisition of problem solving skill’, in J.R. Anderson, ed., Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashall, F. (1994). Remarkable Discoveries. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, K. (1990), Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwood, M.E., & Polson, P.G. (1976), ‘A process model for water jug problems’, Cognitive Psychology 8, 191-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, F.C. (1958), Thinking, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brachman, R.J. & Levesque, J., eds., (1985), Readings in knowledge representation. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branting, K. (1991), Integrating rules and precedents for classification and explanation, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (1991), Intelligence without reason. AI Memo 1293, MIT.

  • Buchanan, B.G., Sutherland, G.L., & Feigenbaum, E.A. (1969), ‘Heuristic DENDRAL: A program for generating explanatory processes in organic chemistry’, in B. Meltzer and D. Michie, eds., Machine Intelligence 4. New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1950), Logical foundations of probability, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1952), The continuum of inductive methods, Chicago, II,: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W.G., & Simon, H.A. (1973), ‘Perception in chess’, Cognitive Psychology 4, 55-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N., & Oaksford, M.R., (1990), ‘Autonomy, Implementation and Cognitive Architecture: A Reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn’, Cognition 34, 93-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chater, N., & Oaksford, M.R. (1993), ‘Logicism, mental models and everyday reasoning: Reply to Garnham’, Mind & Language 8, 72-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, P.W., & Novick, L.R. (1992), ‘Covariation in natural causal induction’, Psychological Review 99, 365-382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. (1989), A Neurocomputational Perspective, Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S. (1986), Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. (1983), Rethinking Cognitive Theory. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darden, L. (1991), Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayal, S., Harmer, M., Johnson, P., & Mead, D. (1993), ‘Beyond Knowledge Representation: Commercial Uses for Legal Knowledge Bases’, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Computing Machinery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E. & Nilsson, N.J. (1976), ‘Subjective Bayesianmethods for rule-based inference systems’, Proceedings National Computer Conference (AFIPS), vol. 15; reprinted in Shafer & Pearl (1990): 274-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.St.B.T. (1989), Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.St.B.T., Newstead, S.E., & Byrne, R.M.J. (1993), Human Reasoning. Brighton: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J.St.B.T. & Over, D. E. (1996), Rationality in the selection task: Epistemic utility versus uncertainty reduction. Psychological Review, 103, 356-363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. (1975), The language of thought, New York: Thomas Crowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. (1983), The modularity of mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A. (1987), Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A., & Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1988), ‘Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis’, Cognition 28, 3-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagn´e, R.M., & Smith, E.C. Jr. (1962), ‘A study of the effects of verbalization on problem solving’, Journal of Experimental Psychology 63, 12-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1985), The mind's new science. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R. N. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. (in press), ‘Reasoning the fast and frugal way’, Psychological Review.

  • Glymour, C. (1991), ‘The hierarchies of knowledge and the mathematics of discovery’, Minds and Machines 1, 75-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, E.M. (1967), ‘Language identification in the limit’, Information and Control 16, 447-474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. (1993), ‘How we know our own minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J.G. (1974), ‘Hobbits and orcs: Acquisition of a sequential concept’, Cognitive Psychology 6, 270-292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R. (1958), Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R. (1961), Is there a logic of discovery? In H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 20-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C.E., & Zajonc, R.B., eds., (1984), Emotions, cognition, and behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983), Mental Models, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P.N., & Byrne, R.M.J. (1991), Deduction, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A., eds., (1982), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klayman, J. & Ha, Y. (1987), ‘Confirmation, disconfirmation and information in hypothesis testing’. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987), Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laming, D. (1996), ‘On the analysis of irrational data selection: A critique of Oaksford & Chater (1994)’. Psychological Review, 103, 364-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R.W. (1987), Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G.L., & Zytkow, J.M. (1987), Scientific discovery, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1979), Laboratory life, Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J.E. (1991), ‘Emotion and the limbic system concept.’ Concepts in Neuroscience, 2, 169- 199.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J.E. (1992), ‘Brain mechanisms of emotion and emotional learning.’ Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2, 191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, M.C. & Anderson, J.R. (1994), Effects of solving related proofs on memory and transfer in geometry problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 366-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manktelow, K.I., & Over, D.E. (1987), ‘Reasoning and rationality’, Mind and Language 2, 199-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manktelow, K.I., & Over, D.E. (1991), ‘Social roles and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals’</del>'</del>, Cognition 39, 85-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J., & Hayes, P (1969), ‘Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence’, in B. Meltzer and D. Michie, eds., Machine Intelligence 4, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, W.E., & Richardson, R.C. (1995), ‘How notto demarcate cognitive science and folk psychology: A response to Pickering and Chater’, Minds and Machines 5, 339-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N. (Ed.) (1987), The Process of Science: Contemporary Philosophical Approaches to Understanding Scientific Practice, Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. & Simon, H.A. (1972), Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford, M.R., & Chater, N. (1991), ‘Against Logicist Cognitive Science’, Mind and Language 6, 1-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford, M.R., & Chater, N. (1993), ‘Reasoning Theories and Bounded Rationality’, in K. Manktelow & D. Over (Eds.), Rationality, London: Routeledge, pp. 31-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994), ‘Arational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection’, Psychological Review 101, 608-631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford, M.R., & Chater, N. (1995a), ‘Information gain explains relevance which explains the selection task’, Cognition 57, 97-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1995b), ‘Theories of reasoning and the computational explanation of everyday inference’, Thinking and Reasoning 1, 121-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford, M.R. & Chater, N. (1996), ‘Rational and irrational analysis of the selection task’, Psychological Review, 103, 381-391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl, J. (1988), Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J. (1991), Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. D. & Edwards, W. (1966), ‘Conservatism in a simple probability inference task’, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 346-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, M.J, & Chater, N. (1995), ‘Why cognitive science is not formalized folk psychology’, Minds and Machines 5, 309-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. (1959), The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. (Ed.) (1989), Foundations of cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1965), ‘Trial and error predicates’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 30, 49-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1984), Computation and cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O. (1953), ‘Two dogmas of empiricism’, From a logical point of view, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 20-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1938), Experience and Prediction, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rips, L.J. (1994), The Psychology of Proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, A.G. (1959), ‘Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers’, IBM Journal of Research and Development 2, 320-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S. & Singer, J.E. (1962), ‘Cognitive, social and physiological determinants of emotional state’. Psychological Review, 63, 379-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S. (1964), ‘The interaction of cognitive and physiological determinants of emotional state’. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, G. & Pearl, J., eds., (1990), Readings in uncertain reasoning, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949), The mathematical theory of communication, Urbana, II.: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavlik, J.W., & Dietterich, T.G., eds., (1990), Readings in machine learning, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortliffe, E.H. & Buchanan, B.G. (1975), ‘A model of inexact reasoning in medicine’, Mathematical Biosciences 23, 351-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. & Gilmartin, K.J. (1973), ‘A simulation for chess positions’. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, S. (1983), From folk psychology to cognitive science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. TWO PROJECTS FOR UNDERSTANDING THE MIND 569

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1987), Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1988), Computational philosophy of science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1992), Conceptual revolutions, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R.D. (1985), Faraday's discovery of induction: A cognitive approach. In D. Gooding & F. James (Eds.) Faraday rediscovered: Essays on the life and work of Michael Faraday, 1791-1867, New York: Stockton, pp. 189-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tweney, R.D., Doherty, M.E. & Mynatt, C.R. (Eds.) (1981), On scientific thinking, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C. (1966), ‘Reasoning’, in Foss, B. (Ed.), New horizons in psychology, Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C. (1968), ‘Reasoning about a rule’, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1972), The psychology of reasoning: Structure and content, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (Eds.) (1977), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. (1990), The Child's Theory of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom

    Nick Chater

  2. Human Communication Research Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, 56 Hillhead Street, Glasgow, G12 9YR, United Kingdom

    Martin Pickering

Authors
  1. Nick Chater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Pickering
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chater, N., Pickering, M. Two Projects for Understanding the Mind: A Response to Morris and Richardson. Minds and Machines 7, 553–569 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008264330143

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008264330143

Search

Navigation