Abstract
The complexity of science is described in the two major science education reform documents in the US: Benchmarks for Science Literacy (1993) and National Science Education Standards (1996). Some have seen them as too ‘postmodern’ while others have charged they are too ‘modern’ in their descriptions of the nature of science.An analysis of the documents shows how each charge might arise. Science's complexity requires one to say that ‘scientific knowledge is tentative or subject to change’ and ‘scientific knowledge is stable'; that ‘change is a persistent feature of science’ and ‘continuity is a persistent feature of science'; that ‘it is normal for scientists to differ with one another’ and ‘scientists work toward consensus'. Both Benchmarks andStandards describe science in terms that sometimes seem to emphasize tentative, local knowledge while at other times emphasizing stable, universal knowledge. Although the overall picture of science presented by each document appears to be one of modern realism, it is not difficult to see how the postmodern relativist could select statements thatpaint science as epistemically equivalent to the social sciences or even the arts and humanities. Implications for science education are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1989, Science for All Americans, AAAS Press, Washington, DC.
American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1993, Benchmarks for Science Literacy, AAAS Press, Washington, DC.
Aronowitz, A.: 1988, Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
Bachelard, G.: 1934, The New Scientific Spirit, Beacon Press, Boston, MA.
Bunge, M.: 1989, Ethics–The Good and the Right, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Culler, J.: 1982, On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Dewey, J.: 1916, Democracy and Education, Macmillan, New York, NY.
Feyerabend, P.: 1975, Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge, New Left Books, London.
Good, R. & Demastes, S.: 1995, ‘The Diminished Role of Nature in Postmodern Views of Science and Science Education’, in F. Finley et al. (eds), Proceedings, Vol. 1, Third International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
Good, R., Shymansky, J. & Yore, L.: 1999, ‘Censorship in Science and Education’, in E. Brinkley (ed), Caught Off Guard: Teachers Rethinking Censorship and Controversy, Allyn & Bacon, New York, NY.
Goonatilake, S.: 1984, Aborted Discovery: Science and Creativity in the Third World, Zed Press, London.
Gross, P. & Levitt, N.: 1994, Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Gross, P., Levitt, N. & Lewis, M. (eds): 1995, The Flight from Science and Reason, New York Academy of Sciences/Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
Harding, S.: 1991, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking From Women's Lives, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.
Harding, S.: 1994, ‘Is Science Multicultural? Challenges, Resources, Opportunities, Uncertainties’, Configurations 2, 301–330.
Hodson, D.: 1993, ‘In Search of a Rationale forMulticultural Science Education’, Science Education 77, 685–711.
Holton, G.: 1988, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Holton, G.: 1993, Science and Anti-Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Jegede, O.: 1989, ‘Toward a Philosophical Basis for Science Education in the 1990s: An African Viewpoint’, in D. Herget (ed.), The History and Philosophy of Science in Science Teaching, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Koertge, N. (ed.): 1998, A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodern Myths about Science, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
Latour, B.: 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Latour, B.& Woolgar, S.: Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage, London.
Mahner, M. & Bunge, M.: 1996, ‘Is Religious Education Compatible with Science Education?’ Science & Education 5, 101–123.
Martin, M.: 1990, Atheism— A Philosophical Justification, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Matthews, M.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science, Routledge, New York, NY.
Matthews, M.: 2000, Time for Science Education: How Teaching the History and Philosophy of Pendulum Motion Can Contribute to Science Literacy, Plenum Press, New York, NY.
National Academy of Sciences: 1996, National Science Education Standards, NAS, Washington, DC.
Newton, R.: 1997, The Truth of Science: Physical Theories and Reality, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Newton-Smith, W.: 1981, The Rationality of Science, Routledge, New York, NY.
Nicholson, R.: 1993, ‘Postmodernism’, Science 277(July 9), 268.
Ogawa, M.: 1989, ‘Beyond the Tacit Framework of Science and Science Education among Science Educators’, International Journal of Science Education 11, 247–250.
Pomeroy, D.: 1992, ‘Science Across Cultures: Building Bridges Between Traditional Western and Alaskan Native Cultures’, in S. Hills (ed.), History and Philosophy of Science in Science Education, Vol. 2, Queens University, Kingston, ON.
Rosenau, P.: 1992, Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Slezak, P.: 1994a, ‘Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Education: Part I’, Science & Education 3, 265–294.
Slezak, P.: 1994b, ‘Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Education: Part II: Laboratory Life Under the Microscope’, Science & Education 3, 329–355.
Sokal, A. & Bricmont, J.: 1998, Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals’ Abuse of Science, Picador, New York, NY.
Stanley, W. & Brickhouse, N.: 1994, ‘Multiculturalism, Universalism, and Science Education’, Science Education 28, 387–398.
Wilson, E.: 1998, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, Knopf, New York, NY.
Wolpert, L.: 1993, The Unnatural Nature of Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Woolgar, S. (ed.): 1988, Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge, Sage, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Good, R., Shymansky, J. Nature-of-Science Literacy in Benchmarks and Standards: Post-Modern/Relativist or Modern/Realist?. Science & Education 10, 173–185 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008789610357
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008789610357