Skip to main content
Log in

On convergence of the EM algorithmand the Gibbs sampler

  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article we investigate the relationship between the EM algorithm and the Gibbs sampler. We show that the approximate rate of convergence of the Gibbs sampler by Gaussian approximation is equal to that of the corresponding EM-type algorithm. This helps in implementing either of the algorithms as improvement strategies for one algorithm can be directly transported to the other. In particular, by running the EM algorithm we know approximately how many iterations are needed for convergence of the Gibbs sampler. We also obtain a result that under certain conditions, the EM algorithm used for finding the maximum likelihood estimates can be slower to converge than the corresponding Gibbs sampler for Bayesian inference. We illustrate our results in a number of realistic examples all based on the generalized linear mixed models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breslow, N. E. and Clayton, D. G. (1993) Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 88, 9-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P. and Tiao, G. C. (1992) Bayesian Inference in Sta-tistical Analysis. London: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, M. J. (1978) Beta-binomial ANOVA for proportions. Appl. Statist., 27, 34-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaportas, P. and Smith, A. F. M. (1993) Bayesian inference for generalised linear and proportional hazards models via Gibbs sampling. Appl. Statist., 42, 443-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M. and Rubin, D. B. (1977) Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). J.R. Statist. Soc. B, 39, 1-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamerman, D. (1997) Markov Chain Monte Carlo. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E., Sahu, S. K. and Carlin, B. P. (1995) Efficient parametrization for normal linear mixed models. Biometrika, 82, 479-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A. (1997) Discussion of the paper by Meng and van Dyk. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 59, 554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilks, W. R. (1997) Discussion of the paper by Meng and van Dyk. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 59, 543-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilks, W. R., Best, N. G. and Tan, K. K. C. (1995) Adaptive Rejection Metropolis Sampling within Gibbs Sampling. Appl. Statist., 455-72.

  • Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. and Spiegelhalter, D. G. (1996) Markov Chain Monte Carlo In Practice, London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. (Eds.) (1977) The State of the Art in Numerical Anal-ysis. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Rubin, D. B. and Wu, Y. (1998) Parameter expansion for EM acceleration: the PX-EM algorithm. Biometrika, 85, 973-979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. S. (1996) Fraction of Missing Information and Conver-gence Rate of Data Augmentation. Preprint.

  • McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. (1989) Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, C. E. (1997) Maximum Likelihood Algorithms for Generalized Linear Mixed Models. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 92, 162-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X.-L. (1994) On the Rate of Convergence of the ECM Algorithm. Ann. Statist., 22, 326-339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X.-L. and Rubin, D. B. (1993) Maximum likelihood esti-mation via the ECM algorithm: a general framework. Bio-metrika, 80, 267-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng, X-L. and van Dyk, D. (1997) The EM algorithm-an old folk-song sung to a fast new tune (with discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 59, 511-67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. O. and Sahu, S. K. (1996) Rate of Convergence of the Gibbs Sampler by Gaussian Approximation. Technical Re-port, University of Cambridge.

  • Roberts, G. O. and Sahu, S. K. (1997) Updating Schemes, Cor-relation Structure, Blocking and Parameterisation for the Gibbs Sampler. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 59, 291-317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, G. O. and Sahu, S. K. (1997b) Discussion of the paper by Meng and van Dyk. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 59, 558-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, S. K. (1997) Bayesian Estimation and Model Choice in Item Response Models. Available from http://www.cf.ac.uk=/ uwcc/maths/sahu/.

  • Schafer, D. W. (1987) Covariate measurement error in generalized linear models. Biometrika, 74, 385-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, B. M. (1996) A Modified EM Algorithm for Estimation in Generalized Mixed Models. Biometrics, 52, 1295-310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Thomas, A. and Best, N. G. (1996) Com-putation on Bayesian graphical models. In Bayesian Statis-tics 5, (Eds. J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid and A. F. M. Smith). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 407-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M. A. (1996) Tools for Statistical Inference. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dyk, D. and Meng, X.-L. (1997) On the Orderings and Groupings of Conditional Maximizations within ECM-type Algorithms. J. Comput. Graph. Statist., 6, 202-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1976) On the existence and uniqueness of the maximum likelihood estimates for certain generalized linear models. Biometrika, 63, 27-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, A. S. and Keller J. B. (1989) Approximations for Regression With Covariate Measurement Error. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 83, 1057-66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahu, S.K., Roberts, G.O. On convergence of the EM algorithmand the Gibbs sampler. Statistics and Computing 9, 55–64 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008814227332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008814227332

Navigation