Abstract
Verification of putative quantitative trait loci (QTL) is an essential step towards implementing the use of marker-assisted selection (MAS) in cultivar improvement. In a previous study with 150 doubled haploid lines derived from the 6-row cross Steptoe/Morex (S/M), four regions (QTL1–4) of the barley genome were associated with differential genotypic expression for grain yield across environments. The objectives of this study were to verify the value of these four QTL for selection and to compare the efficiency of alternative MAS strategies using these QTL vs. conventional phenotypic selection for grain yield. A total of 92 DHLs derived from the S/M cross that were not used in the original mapping efforts were used for QTL verification. Confirmation of QTL effects was first accomplished by assessing yield differences between individuals carrying alternative alleles at each putative locus in three environments. QTL1 on chromosome 3 was confirmed as the most important and consistent locus to determine yield across sites, with the S allele being favorable. The M allele at QTL3 on chromosome 6 was beneficial for grain yield across sites, but to a lesser degree than QTL1. Magnitudes of allele effects at QTL2 (chromosome 2) and QTL4 (chromosome 7) were highly influenced by the environment where the genotypes were grown. Verification of QTL effects was best achieved by comparing realized selection response. Genotypic (MAS) and tandem genotypic and phenotypic selection were at least as good as phenotypic selection. Consistent selection responses were detected for QTL1 alone and together with QTL3. Genotypic selection for lines carrying the S allele at QTL1 resulted in the identification of high-yielding genotypes. Selection responses increased when the M allele at QTL3 was combined with the S allele at QTL1. Significant qualitative QTL × environment interactions for QTL2 and QTL4 were detected through differential realized selection responses at different sites. Without a thorough understanding of the physiological and agronomic particulars of any QTL and the target environment, MAS for QTL showing qualitative interactions should be minimized
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backes G, Granner A, Foroughi-Wehr B, Fischbeck G, Wenzel G, Jahoor A: Localization of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for agronomic important characters by the use of a RFLP map in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Theor Appl Genet 90: 294–302 (1995).
Bezant J, Laurie D, Pratchett N, Chojecki J, Kearsey M: Mapping QTL controlling yield and yield components in a spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross using marker regression. Mol Breed 3: 29–38 (1997).
Clancy JA, Jitkov VA, Han F, Ullrich SE: Barley tissue as direct template for PCR: a practical breeding tool. Mol Breed 2: 181–183 (1996).
Fox PN, Crossa J, Romagosa I: Genotype × environment and adaptation. In: Kempton R, Fox P (eds) Statistical Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation, pp. 117–138. Chapman & Hall, London (1997)
Gauch HG: Statistical Analysis of Regional Yield Trials: AMMI Analysis of Factorial Designs. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1992).
Gimelfarb A, Lande R: Marker-assisted selection and marker-QTL associated in hybrid populations. Theor Appl Genet 91: 522–528 (1995).
Han F, Ullrich SE, the North American Barley Genome Mapping Project: Mapping of quantitative trait loci associated with malting quality. Barley Genet Newsl 23: 84–97 (1993).
Han F, Ullrich SE, Chirat S, Menteur S, Jestin L, Sarrafi A, Hayes PM, Jones BL, Blake TK, Wesenberg DM, Kleinhofs, A, Kilian A: Mapping of β-glucan content and β-glucanase activity loci in barley grain and malt. Theor Appl Genet 91: 921–927 (1995).
Han F, Ullrich SE, Clancy JA, Jitkov V, Kilian A, Romagosa I: Verification of barley seed dormancy loci via linked molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 92: 87–91 (1996).
Han F, Romagosa I, Ullrich SE, Jones BL, Hayes PM, Wesenberg DM: Molecular marker assisted selection for malting quality traits in barley. Mol Breed 3: 427–437 (1997).
Hayes PM, Liu BH, Knapp SJ, Chen F, Jones B, Blake T, Franckowiak J, Rasmusson D, Sorrells M, Ullrich SE, Wesenberg D, Kleinhofs A: Quantitative trait locus effects and environmental interaction in a sample of North American barley germ plasm. Theor Appl Genet 87: 392–401 (1993).
Hayes PM, Iyambo I, the North American Barley Genome Mapping Project: Summary of QTL effects in the Steptoe × Morex population. Barley Genet Newsl 23: 98–143 (1993).
Iyamabo OE, Hayes PM. Effects of plot types on detection of quantitative-trait-locus effects in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Plant Breed 114: 55–60 (1995).
Jiang C, Zeng ZB: Multiple trait analysis of genetic mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 140: 1111–1127 (1995).
Kjaer B, Jensen J: Quantitative trait loci for grain yield and yield components in a cross between a six-rowed and a tworowed barley. Euphytica 90: 39–48 (1996).
Kleinhofs A, Kilian A, Saghai-Maroof MA, Biyashev RM, Hayes P, Chen FQ, Lapitan N, Fenwich A, Blake TK, Kanazin V, Ananiev E, Dahleen L, Kudrna D, Bollinger J, Knapp SJ, Liu B, Sorrells M, Heun M, Franckowiak JD, Hoffman D, Skadsen R, Steffenson BJ: A molecular, isozyme and morphological map of the barley (Hordeum vulgare) genome. Theor Appl Genet 86: 705–712 (1993).
Langridge P, Karakousis A, Collins N, Kretschmer J, Manning S: A consensus linkage map of barley. Mol Breed 1: 389–395 (1995).
Larson SR, Kadyrzhanova D, McDonald C, Sorrells M, Blake TK: Evaluation of barley chromosome-3 yield QTLs in a backross F2 population using STS-PCR. Theor Appl Genet 93: 618–625 (1996).
Lincoln SE, Daly MJ, Lander ES: Mapping genes controlling quantitative traits with MAPMAKER/QTL 1.1Whitehead Institute Technical Report, Massachusetts (1992).
Lindhout P, van Heusden S, Pet G, van Ooijen JW, Sandbrink H, Verkerk R, Vrielink R, Zabel P: Perspective of molecular marker assisted breeding for earliness in tomato. Euphytica 79: 279–286 (1994).
Luo ZW, Kearsey J: Interval mapping of quantitative trait loci in an F2 population. Heredity 70: 245–253 (1992).
Mead R: Design of plant breeding trials. In: Kempton R, Fox P (eds) Statistical Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation, pp. 40–67. Chapman & Hall, London (1997).
Monforte AJ, Asins MJ, Carbonell EA: Salt tolerance in Lycopersicon species. IV. Efficiency of marker-assisted selection for salt tolerance improvement. Theor Appl Genet 93: 765–772 (1996).
National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration: Climatological data annual summary. 99: 6–10 Washington (1995).
National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration: Climatological data annual summary. 100: 6–10 Washington (1996).
Patterson, AH: Genome Mapping in Plants. R.G. Landes/ Academic Press, Austin, TX (1996).
Powell W, Thomas WTB, Baird E, Lawrence P, Booth A, Harrower C, McNicol JW, Waugh R: Analysis of quantitative traits in barley by the use of amplified fragment length polymorphisms. Heredity 79: 48–59 (1997).
Qi X, Stam P, Lindhout: Comparison and integration of four barley genetic maps. Genome 39: 379–394 (1996).
Ribaut JM, Jiang C, Gonzalez-de-Leon D, Edmeades GO, Hoisington DA: Identification of quantitative trait loci under drought conditions in tropical maize. 2. Yield copmponents and marker-assisted selection strategies. Theor Appl Genet 94: 887–896 (1997).
Romagosa I, Ullrich SE, F Han, P.T Hayes and the North American Barley Genome Mapping Project: Use of the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model in QTL mapping for adaptation in barley. Theor Appl Genet 96: 30–37 (1996).
Schneider KA, Nrothers ME, Kelly JD:Marker-assisted selectyion to improve drought resistance in common bean. Crop Sci 37: 51–60 (1997).
Stuber CW: Biochemical and molecular markers in plant breeding. In Janick J (ed) Plant Breeding Reviews, vol. 10, pp. 37–61. John Wiley, New York (1992).
Stuber CW: Breeding multigenic traits. In: Phillips RL, Vasil IK (eds) DNA-Based Markers in Plants, pp. 000–000. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, Netherlands (1994).
Stuber CW: Mapping and manipulating quantitative triats in maize. Trends Genet 11: 477–481 (1995).
Thomas WTB, Powell W, Waugh R, Chalmers KJ, Barua UM, Jack P, Lea V, Forster BP, Swanston JS, Ellis RP, Hanson PR, Lance RCM: Detection of quantitative trait loci for agronomic, yield, grain and disease characters in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet 91: 1037–1047 (1995).
Tinker NA, Mather DE: Methods for QTL analysis with progeny replicated in multiple environments. J Quant Trait Loci (on line). Available through: http://probe. nalusda.gov:8000/otherdocs/jqtl/jqtl1995–01/jqtl15.html (1995).
Tinker NA, Mather DE: MQTL: software for simplified composite interval mapping of QTL in multiple environments. J Quant Trait Loci (on line). Available through: http://probe.nalusda.gov:8000/otherdocs/jqtl/jqtl199502/jqtl16r2.html (1995).
Tinker NA, Mather DE, Rossnagel BG, Kasha KJ, Kleinhofs A, Hayes PM, Falk DE, Ferguson T, Shugar LP, Legge WG, Irvine RB, Choo TM, Briggs KG, Ullrich SE, Franckowiak JD, Blake TK, Graf RJ, Dofing SM, Saghai Maroof MA, Scoles GJ, Hoffman D, Dahleen LS, Kilian A, Chen F, Biyashev RM, Kudrna DA, Steffenson: Regions of the genome that affect agronomic performance in two-row barley. Crop Sci 36: 1053–1062 (1996).
Van Berloo R, Stam P, Van Berloo R: Marker-assisted selection in autogamous RIL populations: a simulation study. Theor Appl Genet 96: 147–154 (1998).
Xu Yunbi: Quantitative trait loci: separating, pyramiding, and cloning. Plant Breed Rev 15: 85–139 (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romagosa, I., Han, F., Ullrich, S.E. et al. Verification of yield QTL through realized molecular marker- assisted selection responses in a barley cross. Molecular Breeding 5, 143–152 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009684108922
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009684108922