References
The Sunday Times: 1996, ‘Health checks that carry a high risk’, 21 July.
Annas, G.J., L.H. Glantz and P.A. Roche: 1995, The Genetic Privacy Act and Commentary. Boston University School of Public Health, available at http://wwwbushph.bu.edu/Depts/HealthLaw/
Billings, P. and J. Beckwith: 1992, ‘Genetic testing in the workplace: a view from the USA’, Trends in Genetics8, pp. 198–200.
Brandeis, L. and S. Warren: 1890, ‘The right to privacy’, Harvard Law Review4, pp. 193–221.
Breard v City of Alexandria, 1947, 46 F 2d 337, DC La.
Calcutt, D., 1993, Review of Press Self-Regulation, Cm 2135.
Chadwick, R., M. Levitt and D. Shickle (eds): 1997, The Right to Know and the Right Not to Know, Aldershot: Avebury Press.
Committee on Privacy and Related Matters: 1990, Report of the Committee on Privacy and Related Matters, Cm 1102.
Entick v Carrington: 1765, 19 State Tr 1029. European Privacy Directive, 1995: 95/46 OJ, No C 93/3, April 13.
Gormley, K.: 1992, ‘One hundred years of privacy’, Wisconsin Law Review, pp. 1335–1441.
Gostin, L.: 1991, ‘Genetic discrimination: The use of genetically based diagnostic and prognostic tests by employers and insurers’, American Journal of Law and Medicine17, pp. 109–144.
Gostin, L.: 1995, ‘Health information privacy’, Cornell Law Review80, pp. 451–477.
Gross, H.: 1971, ‘Privacy and autonomy’. In: J.R. Pennock and J. Chapman (eds.), Privacy. New York: Atherton Press.
Hellewell v Chief Constable of Derbyshire: 1995, 1 WLR 805.
Holtzman, N.A.: 1995, ‘The attempt to pass the Genetic Privacy Act in Maryland’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics23, pp. 367–370.
House of Commons, National Heritage Committee: 1993, Fourth Report. Privacy and Media Intrusion, HC 294–I.
House of Commons, Science and Technology Committee: 1995, Third Report. Human Genetics: The Science and Its Consequences, HC 41–I.
Human Genetics Advisory Commission: 1997, The Implications of Genetic Testing.
Jackson, J.D.: 1997, ‘Playing the culture card in resisting crossjurisdictional transplants: A comment on legal processes and national culture’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law5, pp. 51–67.
Kaye v Robertson: 1991, FSR 62.
Kevles, D.J. and L. Hood: 1992, The Code of CodesCambridge: Harvard University Press.
Khorasandjian v Bush: 1993, 3 WLR 476.
Kielstein, R. and H. Sass: 1992, ‘Right not to know or duty to know? Prenatal screening for polycystic renal disease’, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy17, pp. 395–405.
Malone v Lasky: 1907, 2 KB 141.
Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner: 1979, 1 Ch 344.
Marine Insurance Act: 1906.
Motherwell v Motherwell: 1976, 73 DLR (3rd) 62.
National Human Genome Research Institute: 1998, GeneticInformation and the Workplace. January, Available at http://www.nhgri.Hih.gov:80/HGP/Reports/genetics_workplace.html.
Ngwena, C. and R. Chadwick: 1993, ‘Genetic diagnostic information and the duty of confidentiality: Ethics and law’, Medical Law International1, pp. 73–95.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics: 1993, Genetic Screening: Legal and Ethical Issues.
Olmstead, v United States: 1928, 277 US at 478.
Parmet, W.E.: 1995, ‘Legislating privacy: The HIV experience’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics23, pp. 371–376.
Patel v Patel: 1988, 2 FLR 179.
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennysylvania v Casey: 1994, 510 US 1309.
Prince Albert v Strange: 1849, 41 ER 1171.
Prosser, W.: 1960, ‘Privacy’, California Law Review48, pp. 383–316.
R v Khan: 1996, The Times, 5 July.
R v Ministry of Defence, ex parte Smith: 1996, 1 All ER 257.
R v Sang: 1980, AC 402.
Re B (a minor)(Wardship:Sterilisation): 1988, AC 199.
The Rees Case: 1987, 2 FLR 111.
Re MW (Adoption: Surrogacy): 1995, 2 FLR 759.
Roe v Wade: 1973, US 113.
Rothstein, M.A.: 1992, ‘Discrimination based on genetic information’, Jurimetrics Journal33, pp. 13–18.
Suter, S.M.: 1993, ‘Whose genes are these anyway? Familial conflict over access to genetic information’, Michigan Law Review91, pp. 1856–1908.
Wacks, R.: 1995, Privacy and Press Freedom. London: Blackstone Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGleenan, T. The jurisprudence of genetic privacy. Med Health Care Philos 1, 225–233 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009965009817
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009965009817