Abstract
Scientific development influences philosophical thought, and vice versa. If philosophy is to be of any use to the production, evaluation or application of biochemical knowledge, biochemistry will have to explicate its needs. This paper concentrates on the need for a philosophical analysis of methodological challenges in biochemistry, above all the problematic relation between in vitro experiments and the desire for in vivo knowledge. This problem receives much attention within biochemistry, but the focus is on practical detail. It is discussed how a theoretical analysis can go beyond a naïve understanding of scientific success and failure in such cases. Several examples are presented to elucidate this issue, including the methodological implications of the precautionary principle, the possible interplay between theoretical methodology of biochemistry and the science studies, and the methodological complexities related to experimental protocol standardisation and use of instruments and kits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
D. Allchin, How Do You Falsify a Question? Crucial Tests versus Crucial Demonstrations. PSA 1: 74–88, 1992.
W. Bechtel and R.C. Richardson, Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993.
R.M. Burian, How the Choice of Experimental Organism Matters: Epistemological Reflections on an Aspect of Biological Practice. Journal of the History of Biology 26: 351–367, 1993.
R.M. Burian, Underappreciated Pathways Toward Molecular Genetics as Illustrated by Jean Brachet's Cytochemical Embryology. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), The Philosophy and History of Molecular Biology: New Perspectives, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1996, pp. 67–85.
C. De Duve, Principles of Tissue Fractionation. Journal of Theoretical Biology 6: 33–59, 1964.
J.H. Fujimura, Crafting Science: A Sociohistory of the Quest for the Genetics of Cancer, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.
S. Funtowicz and J.R. Ravetz, Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1990.
S.R. Glasser, F. Chytil and T.C. Spelsberg, Early Effects of Oestradiol-17β on the Chromatin and Activity of the Deoxyribonucleic Acid-dependent Ribonucleic Acid Polymerases (I and II) of the Rat Uterus. Biochemical Journal 130: 947–957, 1972.
I. Hacking, Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.
I. Hacking, The Participant Irrealist At Large in the Laboratory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39: 277–294, 1988.
H. Hillman, Certainty and Uncertainty in Biochemical Techniques, Surrey University Press, Henley-on-Thames, 1972.
R. Hirschelmann, C.V. Rein, A. Springer and U. Graefe, Mode of Action of Antiinflammatory Agents: Relation Between Arachidonic Acid Metabolism and Hydrogen Peroxide Production. European Journal of Pharmacology 183: 2254–2255, 1990.
R. Hirschelmann, Mode of Action of Antiinflammatory Agents: The Problem of Data Interpretation After Experiments In vivo/Ex Vivo, In Situ and In Vitro. Naunyn-Schiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology 344(Suppl. 2): R110, 1991.
L.E. Kay, The Molecular Vision of Life. Caltech, The Rockfeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
E.F. Keller, Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Science and Culture, Routledge, New York, NY, 1992.
T.S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1970.
B. Latour, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Open University Press, Milton Keynes, 1987.
B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986.
National Research Council, Models for Biomedical Research. A New Perspective, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1985.
J. Philpot and J. Stanier, The Choice of the Suspension Medium for Rat-liver-cell Nuclei. Biochemical Journal 63: 214–223, 1956.
A. Pickering, The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995.
N.C. Price and L. Stevens, Fundamentals of Enzymology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1982.
R.S. Read and C.M. Mauritzen, Isolation and Preservation of Cell Nuclei for Studies on RNA Polymerase Activity. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry 48: 559–565, 1970.
H.J. Rheinberger, Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
I.G. Skripal and V.V. Babivhev, [Increase in the In Vitro Activity of Mollicute Transcriptase Using Substances of an Organic Nature (in Russian)]. Mikrobiol. Zhurnal (Kiev) 51: 19–23, 1989.
R. Strand, R. Bøe and T. Flatmark. The Choice of Resuspension Medium for Isolated Rat Liver Nuclei: Effects on Nuclear Morphology and In Vitro Transcription. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 139: 149–157, 1994.
R. Strand, R. Fjelland and T. Flatmark, In Vivo Interpretation of In Vitro Effect Studies with a Detailed Analysis of the Method of In Vitro Transcription in Isolated Cell Nuclei. Acta Biotheoretica 44: 1–21, 1996.
R. Strand, Theoretical Methodology in Biochemistry. Dissertation, Megaloceros Press, Bergen, 1998.
S. Toulmin, The Philosophy of Science: An Introduction, Hutchinson University Library, London, 1953.
C.A. Tyson and J.M. Frazier, Methods in Toxicology. I. In Vitro Biological Systems, Academic Press, London, 1993.
O.K. Vintermyr and S.O. Døskeland, Cell Cycle Parameters of Adult Rat Hepatocytes in a Defined Medium. A Note on the Timing of Nucleolar DNA Replication. Journal of Cell Physiology 132: 12–21, 1987.
S. Wold, M. Sjöström, R. Carlson, T. Lundstedt, S. Hellberg, B. Skagerberg, C. Wikström and J. Öhman, Multivariate Design. Analytica Chimica Acta 191: 17–32, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strand, R. Towards a Useful Philosophy of Biochemistry: Sketches and Examples. Foundations of Chemistry 1, 269–292 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009994005739
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009994005739