Abstract
Spanish verbs display two past-tense forms, the pret´rito and the imperfecto. We offer an account of the semantics of these forms within a situation semantics, addressing a number of theoretically interesting questions about how to realize a semantics for tense and events in that type of framework. We argue that each of these forms is unambiguous, and that the apparent variety of readings attested for them derives from interaction with other factors in the course of interpretation. The meaning of the imperfecto is constrained to always reflect atelic aktionsart. In addition, it contains a modal element, and a contextually-given accessibility relation over situations constrains the interpretation of the modal in ways that give rise to all the attested readings. The pret´rito is indeterminate with respect to aktionsart, neither telic nor atelic. One or the other aktionsart may be forced by other factors in the clause in which the pret´rito occurs, as well as by pragmatic contrast with the possibility of using the imperfecto.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Abusch, Dorit: 1985, On Verbs and Time, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Bach, Emmon: 1986, “The Algebra of Events”, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.
Barwise, Jon: 1986, “The Situation in Logic. II: Conditionals and Conditional Information”, in E. C. Traugott, C. A. Ferguson, and J. S. Reilly (eds.), On Conditionals, pp. 387–403. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Barwise, Jon and John Perry: 1981, “Semantic Innocence and Uncompromising Situations”, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr., and H. K. Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI: Foundations of Analytic Philosophy, pp. 387–404. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
Berman, Steve: 1987, “Situation-based Semantics for Adverbs of Quantification”, in J. Blevins and A. Vainikka (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 12, pp. 45–68. GLSA, Amherst.
Binnick, Robert: 1991, Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford University Press, New York.
Carlson, Greg: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Comrie, Bernard: 1976, Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cooper, Robin: 1986, “Tense and Discourse Location in Situation Semantics”, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 17–36.
de Swart, Henriette: 1992, Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach, PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.
Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Dowty, David: 1986, “The Effects of Aspectual Class on the Temporal Structure of Discourse: Semantics or Pragmatics?”, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 37–61.
Dowty, David: 1987, “Aspect and Aktionsart”, ms., The Ohio State University.
Garey, Howard: 1957, “Verbal Aspect in French”, Language 33, 91–110.
Heim, Irene: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Heim, Irene: 1990, “E-type pronouns and Donkey Anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137–177.
Hinrichs, Erhard W: 1981, Temporale Anaphora im Englischen, unpublished Zulassungarbeit, University of Tübingen.
Hinrichs, Erhard W: 1985, A Compositional Semantics for Aktionsarten and NP Reference in English, PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Hinrichs, Erhard W: 1986, “Temporal Anaphora in Discourses of English”, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 63–82.
Horn, Laurence R: 1984a, “Ambiguity, Negation, and the London School of Parsimony”, Proceeding of NELS 14, pp. 108–131. GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Horn, Laurence R: 1984b, “Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature”, in D. Schiffrin (ed.), “84), pp. 11–42. Georgetown University Press, Washington.
Kamp, Hans: 1979b, “Some Remarks on the Logic of Change. Part I”, in C. Rohrer (ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers, pp. 135–174. Niemeyer, Tübingen.
Kamp, Hans: 1981a, “Évènements, représentations discursives et référence temporelle”, Langages 6, 439–464.
Kamp, Hans: 1981b, “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation”, in J. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, pp. 277–322. Mathematische Centrum, Amsterdam.
Kamp, Hans and Christian Rohrer: 1983, “Tense in Texts”, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, pp. 250–269. De Gruyter, Berlin.
Kenny, Anthony: 1963, Action, Emotion, and Will. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1981, “The Notional Category of Modality”, in H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Reiser (eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, pp. 38–74. De Gruyter, Berlin.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1989, “An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought”, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607–653.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1995, “Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates”, in G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, pp. 125–175. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kratzer, Angelika: 1998, “Scope or Pseudoscope? Are There Wide-Scope Indefinites?”, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 163–196. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Krifka, Manfred: 1986, Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen, PhD Dissertation, University of Munich. Published by Wilhelm Fink, Munich.
Krifka, Manfred: 1987, “Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution: Towards a Semantics of Quantity”, FNS-Bericht 17, Forschungsstelle für natürlich-sprachliche Systeme, Tübingen. Also in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas (eds.), 1989, Semantics and Contextual Expression, Foris (GRASS 11), pp. 75–115. Foris, Dordrecht.
Landman, Fred: 1992, “The Progressive”, Natural Language Semantics 1, 1–32.
Lewis, David: 1970, “General Semantics”, Synthese 22, 18-67. Reprinted in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), 1972, Semantics for Natural Language, pp. 169–218. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Link, Godehard: 1983, “The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach”, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, pp. 303–323. De Gruyter, Berlin.
Link, Godehard: 1987, “Algebraic Semantics for Event Structures”, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 153–173. ITALI, University of Amsterdam.
Moens, Marc and Mark Steedman: 1988, “Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference”, Computational Linguistics 14, 15–28.
Montague, Richard: 1973, “The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English”, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, pp. 221–242. Reidel, Dordrecht, Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.), 1974, Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, pp. 247–270. University Press, New Haven, Yale.
Parsons, Terrance: 1989, “The Progressive in English: Events, States, and Processes”, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 213–241.
Parsons, Terrance: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.
Partee, Barbara: 1984, “Nominal and Temporal Anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.
Portner, Paul: 1992, Situation Theory and the Semantics of Propositional Expressions, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Portner, Paul: 1994, “A Uniform Semantics for Aspectual -ing”, The Proceedings of NELS 24, GLSA, University of Massachusetts of Amherst.
Portner, Paul: 1998, “The Progressive in Modal Semantics”, Language 74(4), 760–787.
Roberts, Craige: 1994, Temporal Adverbial Clauses in an Event-Based Semantics, ms., The Ohio State University.
Stump, Gregory T.: 1985, The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions. Reidel, Dordrecht.
ter Meulen, Alice G. B.: 1984, “Events, Quantities and Individuals”, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, pp. 259–280. Foris, Dordrecht.
ter Meulen, Alice G. B.: 1995, Representing Time in Natural Language: The Dynamic Interpretation of Tense and Aspect. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Verkuyl, H. J.: 1972, On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects, Foundations of Language, Supplementary Series, Vol. 15. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Yoo, Eun-Jung: 1996, “Interpretation of Korean Temporal Markers -ESS and -NUN”, in A. Kathol and J. H. Yoon (eds.), Papers in Tense and Modality. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 47, pp. 137–158. Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Yoon, Jae-Hak: 1996, “Interpretation of Relative Tenses in Korean Time Adverbials”, in A. Kathol and J. H. Yoon (eds.), Papers in Tense and Modality. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 47, pp. 159–177. Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cipria, A., Roberts, C. Spanish Imperfecto and Pretérito: Truth Conditions and Aktionsart Effects in a Situation Semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8, 297–347 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011202000582
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011202000582