Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spanish Imperfecto and Pretérito: Truth Conditions and Aktionsart Effects in a Situation Semantics

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spanish verbs display two past-tense forms, the pret´rito and the imperfecto. We offer an account of the semantics of these forms within a situation semantics, addressing a number of theoretically interesting questions about how to realize a semantics for tense and events in that type of framework. We argue that each of these forms is unambiguous, and that the apparent variety of readings attested for them derives from interaction with other factors in the course of interpretation. The meaning of the imperfecto is constrained to always reflect atelic aktionsart. In addition, it contains a modal element, and a contextually-given accessibility relation over situations constrains the interpretation of the modal in ways that give rise to all the attested readings. The pret´rito is indeterminate with respect to aktionsart, neither telic nor atelic. One or the other aktionsart may be forced by other factors in the clause in which the pret´rito occurs, as well as by pragmatic contrast with the possibility of using the imperfecto.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abusch, Dorit: 1985, On Verbs and Time, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, Emmon: 1986, “The Algebra of Events”, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon: 1986, “The Situation in Logic. II: Conditionals and Conditional Information”, in E. C. Traugott, C. A. Ferguson, and J. S. Reilly (eds.), On Conditionals, pp. 387–403. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, Jon and John Perry: 1981, “Semantic Innocence and Uncompromising Situations”, in P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, Jr., and H. K. Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy VI: Foundations of Analytic Philosophy, pp. 387–404. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Steve: 1987, “Situation-based Semantics for Adverbs of Quantification”, in J. Blevins and A. Vainikka (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 12, pp. 45–68. GLSA, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binnick, Robert: 1991, Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1977, Reference to Kinds in English, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard: 1976, Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Robin: 1986, “Tense and Discourse Location in Situation Semantics”, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Swart, Henriette: 1992, Adverbs of Quantification: A Generalized Quantifier Approach, PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.

  • Dowty, David: 1979, Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1986, “The Effects of Aspectual Class on the Temporal Structure of Discourse: Semantics or Pragmatics?”, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David: 1987, “Aspect and Aktionsart”, ms., The Ohio State University.

  • Garey, Howard: 1957, “Verbal Aspect in French”, Language 33, 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1990, “E-type pronouns and Donkey Anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 137–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, Erhard W: 1981, Temporale Anaphora im Englischen, unpublished Zulassungarbeit, University of Tübingen.

  • Hinrichs, Erhard W: 1985, A Compositional Semantics for Aktionsarten and NP Reference in English, PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.

  • Hinrichs, Erhard W: 1986, “Temporal Anaphora in Discourses of English”, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence R: 1984a, “Ambiguity, Negation, and the London School of Parsimony”, Proceeding of NELS 14, pp. 108–131. GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Laurence R: 1984b, “Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-based and R-based Implicature”, in D. Schiffrin (ed.), “84), pp. 11–42. Georgetown University Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans: 1979b, “Some Remarks on the Logic of Change. Part I”, in C. Rohrer (ed.), Time, Tense and Quantifiers, pp. 135–174. Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans: 1981a, “Évènements, représentations discursives et référence temporelle”, Langages 6, 439–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans: 1981b, “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation”, in J. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, pp. 277–322. Mathematische Centrum, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans and Christian Rohrer: 1983, “Tense in Texts”, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, pp. 250–269. De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Anthony: 1963, Action, Emotion, and Will. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1981, “The Notional Category of Modality”, in H. J. Eikmeyer and H. Reiser (eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts: New Approaches in Word Semantics, pp. 38–74. De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1989, “An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought”, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 607–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1995, “Stage-level and Individual-level Predicates”, in G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, pp. 125–175. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, Angelika: 1998, “Scope or Pseudoscope? Are There Wide-Scope Indefinites?”, in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 163–196. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1986, Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen, PhD Dissertation, University of Munich. Published by Wilhelm Fink, Munich.

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1987, “Nominal Reference and Temporal Constitution: Towards a Semantics of Quantity”, FNS-Bericht 17, Forschungsstelle für natürlich-sprachliche Systeme, Tübingen. Also in R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, and P. van Emde Boas (eds.), 1989, Semantics and Contextual Expression, Foris (GRASS 11), pp. 75–115. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, Fred: 1992, “The Progressive”, Natural Language Semantics 1, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1970, “General Semantics”, Synthese 22, 18-67. Reprinted in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), 1972, Semantics for Natural Language, pp. 169–218. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, “The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice-Theoretical Approach”, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, pp. 303–323. De Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1987, “Algebraic Semantics for Event Structures”, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 153–173. ITALI, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moens, Marc and Mark Steedman: 1988, “Temporal Ontology and Temporal Reference”, Computational Linguistics 14, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, Richard: 1973, “The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English”, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, pp. 221–242. Reidel, Dordrecht, Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.), 1974, Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, pp. 247–270. University Press, New Haven, Yale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terrance: 1989, “The Progressive in English: Events, States, and Processes”, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 213–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, Terrance: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara: 1984, “Nominal and Temporal Anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portner, Paul: 1992, Situation Theory and the Semantics of Propositional Expressions, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portner, Paul: 1994, “A Uniform Semantics for Aspectual -ing”, The Proceedings of NELS 24, GLSA, University of Massachusetts of Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portner, Paul: 1998, “The Progressive in Modal Semantics”, Language 74(4), 760–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Craige: 1994, Temporal Adverbial Clauses in an Event-Based Semantics, ms., The Ohio State University.

  • Stump, Gregory T.: 1985, The Semantic Variability of Absolute Constructions. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Meulen, Alice G. B.: 1984, “Events, Quantities and Individuals”, in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, pp. 259–280. Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Meulen, Alice G. B.: 1995, Representing Time in Natural Language: The Dynamic Interpretation of Tense and Aspect. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkuyl, H. J.: 1972, On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects, Foundations of Language, Supplementary Series, Vol. 15. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, Eun-Jung: 1996, “Interpretation of Korean Temporal Markers -ESS and -NUN”, in A. Kathol and J. H. Yoon (eds.), Papers in Tense and Modality. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 47, pp. 137–158. Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Jae-Hak: 1996, “Interpretation of Relative Tenses in Korean Time Adverbials”, in A. Kathol and J. H. Yoon (eds.), Papers in Tense and Modality. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 47, pp. 159–177. Department of Linguistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Alicia Cipria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Craige Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cipria, A., Roberts, C. Spanish Imperfecto and Pretérito: Truth Conditions and Aktionsart Effects in a Situation Semantics. Natural Language Semantics 8, 297–347 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011202000582

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011202000582

Keywords

Search

Navigation