Abstract
Scientific knowledge is increasingly being stored in online infrastructures such as electronic journals, digital libraries and online encyclopedias. Their designers need to find an adequate approach for representing this knowledge. Unfortunately, most online infrastructures adopt the traditional article-issue-journal model which is based on print technology. This article develops an alternative model for the representation of scientific knowledge which is based on epistemology—the theory of knowledge. The characteristics of scientific knowledge identified by four philosophers of science—Popper, Nagel, Dubin and Bunge—are synthesized into a conceptual model which can be used as the foundation of scientific knowledge infrastructures in an online environment. The article shows that much more fine-grained structures are needed for representing scientific knowledge. Knowledge should not be accumulated as a collection of articles but as a network of epistemologically relevant elements such as theories, concepts, statements, facts etc.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armstrong TS. Peer Review for Journals: Evidence on Quality Control, Fairness and Innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics 1997;3:63-84.
Babbie ER. The Practice of Social Research. 7th edn. Belmont: Wadsworth, 1994.
Booch G, Jacobson I, Rumbaugh J. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Reading: Addison Wesley, 1998.
Bunge M. Philosophy of Science (vol. 1-2). New Brunswick: Transaction Publ., 1998.
Butler HJ. Research into the Reward System of Scholarly Publishing. Where does Scholarly Electronic Publishing Get You? In: Okerson A, ed., Scholarly Publishing on the Electronic Networks: Filling the Pipeline and Paying the Piper (pp. 167-177). Proceedings of the 4th Symposium, Nov. 1994. Washington: Assoc. of Research Libraries, 1995.
Churchman CW. The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organization. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
Dubin R. Theory Building. New York: Free Press, 1978.
Emory CW. Business Research Methods. Cooper Dr., 4th edn. Homewood: Irwin, 1991.
Fay B. Critical Social Science Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987.
Feyerabend PK. Probleme des Empirismus. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1981.
Gadamer HG. Truth and Method. New York: Seabury, 1976.
Guedon J-C. The seminar, the encyclopedia, and the Ecomuseum as possible future forms of electronic publishing. In: Peek RP & Newby GB, eds., Scholarly Publishing-The Electronic Frontier. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996:71-89.
Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon, 1981.
Harrison TM, Stephen T, eds. Computer Networking and Scholarly Communication in the Twenty-First Century. New York: State University of New York Press, 1996.
Harold ER. Extensible Markup Language. IDG, 1998.
McDavid DW. Business Language Analysis for Object-Oriented Information Systems. IBM Systems Journal 1996;35(2):128-150.
Kuhn TS. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 3rd edn. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1996.
Latour B. Science in Action. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1987.
Logoze C, Fielding D. Defining Collections in Distributed Digital Libraries. D-Lib Magazine. Available http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november98/lagoze/11lagoze.html. 1998.
Menard HW. Science: Growth and Change. Cambridge: Harvard, 1971.
Nagel E. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & York, 1961.
Popper KR. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 3rd edn. London: Hutchinson, 1968.
Scheer A-W. ARIS-Business Process Modeling. 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer, 1998.
Schwartz C. Web Search Engines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1998;49(11):973-982.
Story GA et al. The RightPages Image-Based Electronic Library for Alerting and Browsing. IEEE Computer 1992;25(9):17-26.
Treloar A. Libraries' New Role in Electronic Scholarly Publishing. Comm. ACM 1998;41(4):88-89.
Uschold M, Grüninger M. Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. TR AIAI-TR-191 of the Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute, University of Edinburgh, 1996.
Watson R. Creating and sustaining a global community of scholars. MISQ 1994;18(3):228-231. Available http://www.misq.org/archivist/vol/no18/issue3/vol18n3art1watson.html
Wulf W. The national collaboratory-A whitepaper. In: Lederberg J & Uncapher K, eds., Towards a National Collaboratory. Report of an invitational workshop at the Rockefeller University, Washington, D.C.; NSF, Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering, Appendix A, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hars, A. Designing Scientific Knowledge Infrastructures: The Contribution of Epistemology. Information Systems Frontiers 3, 63–73 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011401704862
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011401704862