Skip to main content
Log in

Micropropagation and field evaluation of micropropagated plants of turmeric

  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A protocol was developed for in vitro propagation of turmeric cv `elite' using young vegetative buds from sprouting rhizomes. The shoot buds produced multiple shoots when cultured on MS solid medium supplemented with benzyladenine and 1-naphthalene acetic acid. The effect of various cytokinins on shoot multiplication was studied by culturing the shoot tips on MS liquid medium supplemented with benzyladenine, benzyladenine riboside, kinetin, kinetin riboside, zeatin, 6-γ,γ-dimethylallylaminopurine, adenine, adenine sulfate or metatopolin each at 10 μM in combination with 1-naphthalene acetic acid (1 μM). Significant differences were observed between the treatments. Liquid medium was more favourable than agar medium for shoot multiplication. Among the various concentrations of agar tested, 0.4% and 0.6% were the best and produced the highest number of shoots per explant. Among the different carbohydrates tested, sucrose, fructose, glucose, sugar cubes, maltose, levulose and market sugar were found to be equally effective for shoot multiplication and xylose, rhamnose, lactose and soluble starch were inhibitory. Ninety five percent of the micropropagated plants survived in sterilized soil in paper cups and all of them survived in the field. Among 48 plants, two plants showed variegated leaves on the tillers. The micropropagated plants showed a significant increase in shoot length, number of tillers, number and length of leaves, number of fingers and total fresh rhizome weight per plant when compared with conventionally propagated plants. RAPD analysis of 11 regenerated plants using sixteen 10-mer primers did not show any polymorphism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balachandran SM, Bhat SR & Chandel KPS (1990) In vitro clonal multiplication of turmeric (Curcuma spp.) and ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Plant Cell Rep. 8: 521–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagyalakshmi & Singh NS (1988) Meristem culture and micropropagation of a variety of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) with a high yield of oleoresin. J. Hort. Sci. 63: 321–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthakur M & Bordoloi DN (1992) Micropropagation of Curcuma amada Roxb. J. Spice and Aromatic Crops 1: 154–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthakur M, Hazarika J & Singh RS (1999) A protocol for micropropagation of Alpinia galanga. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 55(3): 231–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra D & Gupta SS (1972) Anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activity of volatile oil of Curcuma longa (Haldi). Indian J. Med. Res. 60: 138

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang BKW & Chiley A (1993) Clonal propagation of pink ginger in vitro. Hort Science 28: 1203

    Google Scholar 

  • Dellaporta SL, Wood J & Hicks JB (1983) A plant DNA minipreparation: Version II, Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 1: 19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande U, Joseph L, Bhide S & Samuel A (1997) The role of thyroid in hypocholesterolaemic effect of turmeric extract (pp 25–26). BARC Newsletter, No. 177, October 1997

  • Eapen S & George L (1990) Influence of phytohormones, carbohydrates, amino acids, growth supplements and antibiotics on somatic embryogenesis and plant differentiation in finger millet. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult 22: 87–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamborg OL, Miller RA & Ojima K (1968) Nutrient requirements of suspension culture of soyabean cells. Exp. Cell. Res. 50: 150–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangopadhyay S (1998) Turmeric (Curcuma longa) an ecofriendly ingredient to control seed-borne rice diseases. Curr. Sci. 75: 16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • George L & Eapen S (1997) Influence of cytokinins and explant type on plant regeneration in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Physiol Mol. Biol. Plants 3: 129–134

    Google Scholar 

  • George L, Eapen S & Rao PS (1989) High frequency somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature inflorescence culture of two Indian cultivars of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Plant Sci.) 99: 405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosoki T & Sagawa Y (1977) Clonal propagtion of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) through tissue culture. Hortscience 12: 451–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda LR & Tambe MJ (1989) In vitro subculture application for ginger. Hortscience 24: 142–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Inden H & Asahira T (1988) Micropropagation of ginger. Acta Hort 230: 177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin PJ, Banks PM, Bhati RR, Bretell IS, Davis PA, Ryan SA, Scowcroft WR, Spindler LH & Tanner GJ (1989) From somatic variation to variant plants: Mechanism and applications. Genome 31: 705–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassay with tobacco tissue cultures, Physiol Plant. 15: 473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadagauda RS, Mascarenhas AF, Hendre RR & Jagannathan V (1978) Rapid multiplication of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 16: 120–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierik RLM (1991) Commercial aspects of micropropagation. In: Prakash J & Pierik RLM (eds) Horticulture - New Technologies and Applications (pp 141–153). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Rout GR, Das P, Goel S & Raina SN (1998) Determination of genetic stability of micropropagated plants of ginger using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Bot. Bull. Acad Sin 39: 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland LJ & Ogden EL (1992) Use of a cytokinin conjugate for efficient shoot regeneration from leaf sections of highbush blueberry. Hort Science 27: 1127–1129

    Google Scholar 

  • Satyavati GV, Raina MK & Sharma M (1976) Medicinal plants of India, Vol I. In: Dr. Satyavati GV, Dr. Raina MK & Dr. Sharma M (eds). Indian Council of Medical Research (pp 312–317). New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoofs J (1992) Rapid clonal propagation, storage and exchange of Musa spp. In: Baker FWG (ed) Rapid Propagation of Fast Growing Woody Species (pp 29-40). CAB Int. Oxon, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy VB & Vasil IK (1992) Biochemical and molecular analysis of plants derived from embryogenic tissue cultures of napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum K. Schum). Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 947–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MK & Hamil SD (1996) Field evaluation of micropropagated ginger in subtropical Qeensland. Aust. J. Expt. Agric. 36: 347–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe TA (1993) In vitro organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis: Physiological and biochemical aspects. In: Roubelakis-Angelakis, KA & Tram Thanh Van K (eds) Morphogenesis in Plants (pp 19–38). Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Welander M, Welander NT & Brackman AS (1989) Regeneration of in vitro shoot multiplication in Syringa, Alnus and Malus by different carbon sources. J.Hort. Sci. 64: 361–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbrouck SPO, Strnad M, Van Onckelew HA & Debergh PC (1996) Meta-topolin, an alternative to benzyladenine in tissue culture? Physiol Plant. 98: 291–297

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Eapen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salvi, N.D., George, L. & Eapen, S. Micropropagation and field evaluation of micropropagated plants of turmeric. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 68, 143–151 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013889119887

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013889119887

Navigation