Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of Subclinical Mastitis in Dromedary Camels (Camelus dromedarius) using Somatic Cell Counts and the N-Acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase Test

  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Somatic cell counts, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase) activity and the infection status of the udder were determined in quarter milk samples (n = 86) from 22 multiparous, clinically healthy camels, traditionally managed by Bedouin nomads in the Negev desert, Israel. Seventy (81.4%) of the 86 samples examined contained bacteria, of which 35 (40.7%) gave mixed isolations of two or more bacteria, suggesting the existence of subclinical mastitis in the camel herds studied. Sixteen samples (18.6%) yielded no growth of bacteria. Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus spp., Bacillus spp., Streptococcus dysgalactiae and Escherichia coli were the main organisms isolated. The somatic cell count (SCC) ranged from 1.01×105 to 11.78×106 cells/ml. NAGase values were between 41.4 and 372 NAGase units. Quarter milk samples that contained bacteria had significantly (p<0.01) higher mean values for SCC but the mean NAGase levels were not significantly different for the bacteriologically negative and positive samples. There was a low correlation coefficient (r 2 = 0.097) between the SCC and NAGase in the quarter milk samples from which bacteria were not isolated (n = 16) and a low negative correlation (r 2 = –0.038) with the samples that contained bacteria (n = 70). The type of bacteria had a significant effect (p<0.01) on the SCC but not on the NAGase activity. Quarter samples from which Staphylococcus aureus (coagulase positive) was isolated showed the highest mean SCC and this organism is therefore suspected to be the underlying cause of the subclinical mastitis. The SCC gave a better indication of the presence of pathogenic microorganisms in milk samples than did NAGase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abdurahman, O.A.S., 1995. N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase and serum albumin as indicators of subclinical mastitis in the camel. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A, 42, 643-647

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdurahman, O.A.S., 1996. The detection of sub-clinical mastitis in the bactrian camel (Camelus bactrianus) by somatic cell count and California mastitis test. Veterinary Research Communications, 20, 9-14

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdurahman, O.A.S., Cooray, R. and Bornstein, S., 1992. The ultrastructure of cell fragments in mammary secretions of Camelus bactrianus. Journal of Veterinary Medicine A, 39, 648-655

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdurahman, O.A.S., Ageb, H., Abbas, B. and Astron, G., 1995. Relations between udder infection and somatic cells in camel (Camelus dromedarius) milk. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 36, 423-431

    Google Scholar 

  • American Public Health Association, 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 15th edn, (American Public Health Association, Washington, DC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, E.K., Nabbut, N.H., Frerichs, W.M., Al-Nakhli, H.M. and Al-Mukayel, A.A., 1985. Mastitis in Camelus dromedarius in Saudi Arabia. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 17, 173-179

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J.M., 1995. Progress in control of mastitis. In: A. Saran and S. Soback (eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Mastitis Seminar, Tel Aviv (Israel), (International Dairy Federation; Book II-Session 4), 3-9

  • Brown, R.W., Morse, G.E., Newbould, F.H.S. and Slanetz, L.W., 1969. Microbiological Procedures for the Diagnosis of Bovine Mastitis, (National Mastitis Council Inc., Washington DC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, B.J., Middleton, G. and Salmon, M., 1978. Bovine milk N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase and its significance in detection of abnormal udder infection. Journal of Dairy Research, 45, 15-20

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, B.J., Seng Kwee, W., Middleton, G. and Andrews, R.J., 1984. Relationship between the level of N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase) in bovine milk and the presence of mastitis pathogens. Journal of Dairy Research, 51, 11-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Kospakov, Z.K., 1978. Cell content in the milk of bactrian camels, depending on stage of lactation and condition of the udder. Veterinary Bulletin, 48, Abstract 6960

    Google Scholar 

  • Maisi, P., Junttila, J. and Seppanen, J., 1987. Detection of sub-clinical mastitis in ewes. British Veterinary Journal, 143, 402-408

    Google Scholar 

  • Minitab, 1989. Data analysis software, release 7.2-standard version, Minitab, Inc.

  • Obeid, A.I. and Bagadi, H.O., 1996. Mastitis in Camelus dromedarius and the somatic cell count of camels' milk. Research in Veterinary Science, 61, 55-58

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalm, O.W., Carroll, E.J. and Jain, N.C., 1971. Bovine Mastitis, (Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia), 315-329

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H.J. and Dioli, M., 1992. The One-humped Camel in Eastern Africa: A Pictorial Guide to Diseases, Health Care and Management, (Verlag Joseph Margraf, Germany)

    Google Scholar 

  • Timms, L.L. and Schultz, L.H., 1985. N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activity and somatic cells in goat milk. Journal of Dairy Science, 68, 3363-3366

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagil, R., 1982. Camels and Camel Milk, (FAO Animal Production and Health Paper, Rome)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagil, R., 1985. The Desert Camel: Comparative Physiological Adaptation, Comparative Animal Nutrition 5, (Karger, Basel)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guliye, A., Van Creveld, C. & Yagil, R. Detection of Subclinical Mastitis in Dromedary Camels (Camelus dromedarius) using Somatic Cell Counts and the N-Acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase Test. Tropical Animal Health and Production 34, 95–104 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014324421258

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014324421258

Keywords

Navigation