Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual Selection and Mate Choice

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After a long period of dormancy, Darwin's theory of sexual selection in general, and mate choice in particular, now represents one of the most active fields in evolutionary research. After a brief overview of the history of ideas and a short introduction into the main mechanisms of sexual selection, I discuss some recent theoretical developments and empirical findings in the study of mate choice and review the various current models of mate choice, which can be grossly divided into adaptive models and nonadaptive models. I also examine whether available primate evidence supports various hypotheses concerning mate choice. Although primatologists were long aware that nonhuman primates have preferences for certain mating partners, until recently the functions and evolutionary consequences of their preferences remained obscure. Now there is growing evidence that mate choice decisions provide primates with important direct or indirect benefits. For example, several observations are consistent with the hypothesis that by direct or indirect mate choice female primates lower the risk of infanticide or enhance the chance of producing viable offspring. Nevertheless, there are also significant holes in our knowledge. How the male mandrill, one of Darwin's famous examples, got his brightly colored face, is still unknown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alberts, S. C. (1999). Paternal kin discrimination in wild baboons. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1501–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. (1986). Female age: Male preference and reproductive success in primates. Int. J. Primatol. 7: 305–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M. B., and Iwasa, Y. (1996). Sexual selection. TREE 11: 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, S. J., and Duvall, D. (1994). Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143: 317–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, T. C.M. (1993). Positive genetic correlation between female preference and preferred male ornament in sticklebacks. Nature 363: 255–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berard, J. D., Nurnberg, P., Epplen, J. T., and Schmidtke, J. (1994). Alternative reproductive tactics and reproductive success in male rhesus macaques. Behaviour 129: 177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, F. B. (1991). Mate selection, consortship formation, and reproductive tactics in adult female savanna baboons. Primates 32: 437–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, F.B. (1995).Female cooperation, consortship maintenance, and male mating success in savanna baboons. Anim. Behav. 50: 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, F. B. (1997). Reproductive strategies of rhesus macaques. Primates 38: 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. (2000). Promiscuity. An Evolutionary History of Sperm Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead, T. R., and Mø ller, A. P. (eds.). (1998). Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischof, N. (1985). Das Rä tselÖ dipus. Die biologischenWurzeln des Urkonfliktes von Intimitä t und Autonomie, Piper, Mü nchen.

  • Boinski, S. (1987). Mating patterns in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21: 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borries, C., Launhardt, K., Epplen, C., Epplen, J. T., and Winkler, P. (1999a). DNA analyses support the hypothesis that infanticide is adaptive in langur monkeys. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 901–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borries, C., Launhardt, K., Epplen, C., Epplen, J. T., and Winkler, P. (1999b). Males as infant protectors in Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus) living in multimale groups: Defense pattern, paternity, and sexual behaviour. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46: 350–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockman, D. K., and Whitten, P. L. (1996). Reproduction in free-ranging Propithecus verreauxi: Estrus and the relationship between multiple partner matings and fertilization. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 100: 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (2000). Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406: 67–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. L. (1997). A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity. Behav. Ecol. 8: 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. (1994). The Evolution of Desire. Strategies of Human Mating, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The Evolution of Parental Care, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. (1976). Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In Bateson, P. P. G., and Hinde, R. A. (eds.), Growing Points in Ethology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 195–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Vincent, A. C. J. (1991). Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature 351: 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, J. L., Ashley, M. V., Goodall, J., and Pusey, A. E. (2001). Noninvasive paternity assignment in Gombe chimpanzees. Mol. Ecol. 10: 1279–1300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cords, M. (1987). Forest guenons and patas monkeys: Male- male competition in one-male groups. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R.W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.), Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, H. (1991). The Ant and the Peacock, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, E. J. A., and Birkhead, T. R. (1998). Sex roles and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56: 1311–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M. (1978). The cost of mating. Am. Nat. 112: 771–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, John Murray, London. Reprinted in 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury, D. A. (1982). Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119: 601–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F. (1983). Observations on the evolution and behavioural significance of ‘sexual skin’ in female primates. Adv. Stud. Behav. 13: 63–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F. (1998). Primate Sexuality. Comparative Studies of the Prosimians, Monkeys, Apes, and Human Beings, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixson, A. F., and Mundy, N. I. (1994). Sexual behavior, sexual swelling, and penile evolution in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Arch. Sex. Behav. 23: 267–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domb, L. G., and Pagel, M. (2001). Sexual swellings advertise female quality in wild baboons. Nature 410: 204–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drickamer, L. C., Gowaty, P. A., and Holmes, C. M. (2000). Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Anim. Behav. 59: 371–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard, W. G. (1996). Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197: 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enquist, M., Rosenberg, R. H., and Temrin, H. (1998). The logic of Mé nageà trois. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265: 609–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etges, W. J. (1996). Sexual selection operating in a wild population of Drosophila robusta. Evolution 50: 2095–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan, L. M. (1982). Primate Paradigms. Sex Roles and Social Bonds, Eden Press, Montré al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fietz, J., Zischler, H., Schwiegk, C., Tomiuk, J., Dausmann, K. H., and Ganzhorn, J. U. (2000). High rates of extra-pair young in the pair-living fat-tailed dwarf lemur, Cheirogaleus medius. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 49: 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1915). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugen. Rev. 7: 184–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagneux, P., Woodruff, D. S., and Boesch, C. (1997). Furtive mating in female chimpanzees. Nature 387: 358–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garber, P. A. (1997). One for all and breeding for one: Cooperation and competition as a tamarin reproductive strategy. Evol. Anthropol. 5: 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerald, M. S. (2001). Primate colour predicts social status and aggressive outcome. Anim. Behav. 61: 559–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerloff, U., Hartung, B., Fruth, B., Hohmann, G., and Tautz, D. (1999). Intracommunity relationships, dispersal pattern and paternity success in a wild living community of Bonobos (Pan paniscus) determined from DNA analysis of faecal samples. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 1189–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. (1992). Barbary macaques challenge theory of female choice. Science 257: 329–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomendio, M., Harcourt, A. H., and Roldá n, E. R. S. (1998). Sperm competition in mammals. In Birkhead, T. R., and Mø ller, A. P. (eds.), Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, Academic Press, London, pp. 667–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowaty, P. A. (1997). Sexual dialectics, sexual selection and variation in mating behavior. In Gowaty, P. A. (ed.), Feminism and Evolutionary Biology: Boundaries, Intersections, and Frontiers, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 351–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T. R., and Arnold, S. J. (1987). Multiple mating by females: A perspective from quantitative genetics. Anim. Behav. 35: 939–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W.D., and Zuk, M.(1982). Heritable true fitness and bright birds:Arole for parasites? Science 218: 384–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, A. (1996). Sexual selection in sperm competition in primates:What are male genitalia good for? Evol. Anthropol. 4: 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, A. H., and Stewart, K. L. (1986). High dominance rank in primate groups requires help from others. In Passera, L., and Lachaud, J. P. (eds.), The Individual and Society, I.E.C., Toulouse, pp. 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemelrijk, C. K., Meier, C., and Martin, R. D. (1999). ‘Friendship’ for fitness in chimpanzees? Anim. Behav. 58: 1223–1229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., and Hasegawa, T. (1994). Infanticide in nonhuman primates: Sexual selection and resource competition. In Parmigiani, S., and vom Saal, F. S. (eds.), Infanticide and Parental Care, Harwood, Chur, pp. 137–154.

  • Holland, B., and Rice, W. R. (1998). Chase-away selection: Antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52: 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S.B. (1981). TheWoman That Never Evolved, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1986). Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In Bleier, R. (ed.), Feminist Approaches to Science, Pergamon, New York, pp. 119–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S.B. (1997). Raising Darwin's consciousness. Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Hum. Nat. 8: 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother Nature. A History of Mothers, Infants, and Natural Selection, Pantheon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B., and Williams, G. C. (1983). Behavioral biology and the double standard. In Wasser, S. K. (ed.), Social Behavior of Female Vertebrates, Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, M. A. (1991). Mate selection and partner preferences in female Japanese macaques. In Fedigan, L. M., and Asquith, P. J. (eds.), The Monkeys of Arashiyama. Thirty-Five Years of Research in Japan and in the West, SUNY, New York, pp. 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. (1942). Evolution, the Modern Synthesis, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, C. H. (1984). Female choice and mating system of the brown capuchin monkey Cebus apella (Primates: Cebidae). Z. Tierpsychol. 65: 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, C. H. (1986). The mating system as a determinant of social evolution in capuchin monkeys (Cebus). In Else, J. G., and Lee, P. C. (eds.), Primate Ecology and Conservation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, C. H. (1994). Comparison of mating system across two populations of brown capuchin monkeys. Am. J. Primatol. 33: 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennions, M. D., and Petrie, M. (1997). Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: A review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72: 283–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, R. A., Reynolds, J. D., and Deutsch, J. C. (1996). Mutual mate choice and sex differences in choosiness. Evolution 50: 1382–1391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. (1996). An evolutionary perspective on physical attractiveness. Evol. Anthropol. 5: 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Intrasexual selection and testis size in strepsirhine primates. Behav. Ecol. 8: 10–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M., and van Schaik, C. P. (this issue). The evolution of primate social systems. Int. J. Primatol.

  • Keddy-Hector, A. C. (1992). Mate choice in non-human primates. Am. Zool. 32: 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, L., and Reeve, H. K. (1995). Why do females mate with multiple males? The sexually selected sperm hypothesis. Adv. Stud. Behav. 24: 291–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M., and Ryan, M. J. (1991). The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350: 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, L. A., Ha, J. C., and Sackett, G. P. (1996). ParentalMHCantigen sharing and pregnancy wastage in captive pigtailed macaques. J. Reprod. Immun. 32: 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, C. (1991). Blood Relations: Menstruation and the Origin of Culture, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraak, S. B. M., and Bakker, T. C. M. (1998). Mutual mate choice in sticklebacks: Attractive males choose big females, which lay larger eggs. Anim. Behav. 56: 859–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, C., Heistermann, M., and Kappeler, P. M. (1999). Physiological suppression of sexual function of subordinate males: A subtle form of intrasexual competition among male sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi)? Physiol. Behav. 66: 855–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuester, J., Paul, A., and Arnemann, J. (1992). Kinship, familiarity and mating avoidance in Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Anim. Behav. 48: 1183–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Launhardt, K., Borries, C., Hardt, C., Epplen, J. T., and Winkler, P. (2001). Paternity analysis of alternative male reproductive routes among the langurs (Semnopithecus entellus) of Ramnagar. Anim. Behav. 61: 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. H. (1992). Measuring female mate choice in Cayo Santiago rhesus macaques. Anim. Behav. 44: 405–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. H. (1994a). Male aggression: A cost of female mate choice in Cayo Santiago rhesus macaques. Anim. Behav. 48: 473–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. H. (1994b). Mating patterns, mate choice, and birth season heterosexual relationships in free-ranging rhesus macaques. Primates 35: 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. H. (1995a). Female mate choice in primates. Evol. Anthropol. 3: 192–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. H. (1995b). Do female rhesus monkeys choose novel males? Am. J. Primatol. 37: 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. H., and Perry, S. E. (1993). Inbreeding avoidance in rhesus monkeys:Whose choice? Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 90: 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R.D. (1992). Female cycles in relation to paternity in primate societies. In Martin, R.D., Dixson, A. F., and Wickings, E. J. (eds.), Paternity in Primates: Genetic Tests and Theories, Karger, Basel, pp. 238–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, W. A. (1966). Social organization of the South American monkey, Callicebus moloch: A preliminary report. Tulane Stud. Zool. 13: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1956). Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. J. Genet. 54: 261–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1972). Sexual selection and natural selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871- 1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 87–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. F. (2000). The Mating Mind. How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mø ller, A. P., and Alatalo, R. V. (1999). Good-genes effects in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266: 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mø ller, A.P., and Thornhill, R. (1998). Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection:Ameta-analysis. Am. Nat. 151: 174–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, C. L. (1999). The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the gradedsignal hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 58: 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohsawa, H., Inoue, M., and Takenaka, O. (1993). Mating strategy and reproductive success of male patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas). Primates 34: 533–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palombit, R. A. (1994). Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous ape. Anim. Behav. 47: 721–723.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palombit, R. A., Seyfarth, R. M., and Cheney, D. L. (1997). The adaptive value of “friendships” to female baboons: Experimental and observational evidence. Anim. Behav. 54: 599–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol. Rev. 45: 525–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, G.A. (1983). Mate quality and mating decisions. In Bateson, P. P.G. (ed.), Mate Choice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 141–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A. (1998). Von Affen und Menschen. Verhaltensbiologie der Primaten, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A., Kuester, J., and Arnemann, J. (1992). Maternal rank affects reproductive success of male Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus): Evidence from DNA fingerprinting. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 30: 337–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A., Preuschoft, S., and van Schaik, C. P. (2000). The other side of the coin: Infanticide and the evolution of affiliate male-infant interactions in Old World primates. In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 269–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D. J., and Potts, W. K. (1999). The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am. Nat. 153: 145- 164.

  • Pereira, M., and Weiss, M. L. (1991). Female mate choice, male migration, and the threat of infanticide in ringtailed lemurs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28: 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul Petrie, M. (1994). Improved growth and survival of offspring of peacocks with more elaborate trains. Nature 371: 598–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. (2000). Mating systems, intrasexual competition, and sexual dimorphism in primates. In Lee, P. C. (ed.), Comparative Primate Socioecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 241–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, E. C. (1990). Infant carrying as a courtship strategy of breeding male cotton-top tamarins. Anim. Behav. 40: 784–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, T. D., Schluter, D., and Heckman, N. E. (1993). Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48: 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, A. E. (1990). Mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in nonhuman primates. In Feierman, J. R. (ed.), Pedophilia: Biosocial Dimensions, Springer, New York, pp. 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, A., and Wolf, M. (1996). Inbreeding avoidance in animals. TREE 11: 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, U. (1995). Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous gibbon (Hylobates lar). Ethology 100: 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1981). How the peacock got his tail. New Sci. 91: 398–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M., and Rechten, K. (1981). Female sticklebacks prefer to spawn with males whose nests contain eggs. Behaviour 76: 152–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Gironé s, M. A., and Enquist, M. (2001). The evolution of female sexuality. Anim. Behav. 61: 695–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. J. (1990). Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7: 157–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, G. P. (1990). Sires influence fetal death in pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina). Am. J. Primatol. 20: 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik, M., Rosenquist, G., and Berglund, A. (2000). Male and female mate choice affects offspring quality in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 2151–2155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple, S., and McComb, K. (2000). Perception of female reproductive state from vocal cues in a mammal species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 707–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setchell, J. M., and Dixson, A. F. (2001a). Circannual changes in the secondary sexual ornaments of semifree-ranging male and female mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Am. J. Primatol. 53: 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setchell, J. M., and Dixson, A. F. (2001b). Changes in the secondary sexual adornments of male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx) are associated with gain and loss of alpha status.Horm. Behav. 39: 177–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. F. (1988). Female primate sexual behavior and conception: Are there really sperm to spare? Curr. Anthropol. 29: 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. F. (1989). Female choice in nonhuman primates. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 32: 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. F. (1993). Female Choices. Sexual Behavior of Female Primates, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. G. (1994). Male dominance and reproductive success in a captive group of rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Behaviour 129: 225–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. G. (1995). Avoidance of close consanguineous inbreeding in captive groups of rhesus macaques. Am. J. Primatol. 35: 31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.G., and Smith, S. (1988). Paternal rank and reproductive success of natal rhesus males. Anim. Behav. 36: 554–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B. (1985). Sex and Friendship in Baboons, Aldine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B.B. (1987). Sexual competition and mate choice. In Smuts, B.B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.), Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 385–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B. (1992). Male aggression against women. An evolutionary perspective. Hum. Nat. 3: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J., and McElreath, R. (2001). Can females gain extra paternal investment by mating with multiple males? A game theoretic approach. Am. Nat. 158: 519–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J., Mitsunaga, F., Shimizu, K., Nozaki, M., Yanagihara, Y., Domingo-Roura, X., and Takenaka, O. (1997a). Sexual selection in Japanese macaques II: Female mate choice and male- male competition. Anim. Behav. 54: 737–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J., Mitsunaga, F., Shimizu, K., Yanagihara, Y., and Nozaki, M. (1997b). Sexual selection in Japanese macaques I: Female mate choice or male sexual coercion? Anim. Behav. 54: 725–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J., Mitsunaga, F., Shizumi, K., Yanagihara, Y., and Nozaki, M. (1999). Female mating strategy in an enclosed group of Japanese macaques. Am. J. Primatol. 47: 263–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J., Thomsen, R., Matsubayashi, K., and Takenaka, O. (2000). Infanticide by resident males and female counter-strategies in wild Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48: 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, J., Thomsen, R., and Takenaka, O. (2001). The interaction of male and female reproductive strategies and paternity in wild Japanese macaques, Macaca fuscata. Anim. Behav. 62: 485–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, C. B. (1999). The Hunting Apes. Meat Eating and the Origins of Human Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenbeek, R. (2000). Infanticide by males and female choice in wild Thomas's langurs. In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 153–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strier, K. B. (1997). Mate preferences of wild Muriqui monkeys (Brachyteles arachnoides): Reproductive and social correlates. Folia Primatol. 68: 120–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The Evolution of Human Sexuality, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardif, S. D., and Bales, K. (1997). Is infant-carrying a courtship strategy in callithrichid primates? Anim. Behav. 53: 1001–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, D.M. (1980).Female choice and mating strategiesamongwild Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus L.). In Lindburg, D. G. (ed.), The Macaques: Studies in Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 287–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871- 1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 136–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk, M.A., and van Schaik, C.P. (1999).The effects of dominance rank and group size on female lifetime reproductive success in wild long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Primates 40: 105–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Noordwijk, M. A., and van Schaik, C. P. (2000). Reproductive patterns in eutherian mammals: Adaptations against infanticide? In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 322–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P. (2000a). Social counterstrategies against infanticide by males in primates and other mammals. In Kappeler, P. M. (ed.), Primate Males, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 34–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P. (2000b). Vulnerability to infanticide by males: Patterns among mammals. In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P., Hodges, J. K., and Nunn, C. L. (2000). Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates. In van Schaik, C. P., and Janson, C. H. (eds.), Infanticide by Males and its Consequences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 361–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P., and Paul, A. (1996/1997). Male care in primates: Does it ever reflect paternity? Evol. Anthropol. 5: 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P., and van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1996). Toward an understanding of the orangutan's social system. In McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., and Nishida, T. (eds.), Great Ape Societies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. P. (1990). Ecology of gorillas and its relation to female transfer in mountain gorillas. Int. J. Primatol. 11: 21–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waynforth, D., and Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: Evidence from lonely hearts advertisements. Behaviour 132: 755–779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedekind, C., and Fü ri, S. (1997). Body odour preferences in men and women: Do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1471–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedell, N., and Tregenza, T. (1999). Successful fathers sire successful sons. Evolution 53: 620–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 123: 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Eberhard, M. J. (1984). Sexual selection, competitive communication and species-specific signals in insects. In Lewis, T. (ed.), Insect Communication, Academic Press, New York, pp. 283–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck, E. (1891). The History of Human Marriage, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, P. L. (1987). Infants and adult males. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., and Struhsaker, T. T. (eds.), Primate Societies, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 343–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickings, E. J., Bossi, T., and Dixson, A. F. (1993). Reproductive success in the mandrill, Mandrillus sphinx: Correlations of male dominance and mating success with paternity, as determined by DNA fingerprinting. J. Zool. 231: 563–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickings, E. J., and Dixson, A. F. (1992). Testicular function, secondary sexual development, and social status in male mandrills (Mandrillus sphinx). Physiol. Behav. 52: 909–916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickler, W. (1967). Socio-sexual signals and their intra-specific imitation among primates. In Morris, D. (ed.), Primate Ethology,Weidenfield and Nicholson, London, pp. 69–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widemo, F., and Sæ ther, S. A. (1999). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: Causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. TREE 14: 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, R. H., and Poston, J. (1996). Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50: 1371–1381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, G. S., Presgraves, D. C., and Crymes, L. (1998). Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391: 276–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, A. P. (1995). Sexual Attraction and Childhood Association: A Chinese Brief for Edward Westermarck, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53: 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, J. A., and Zeh, D. W. (1996). The evolution of polyandry I: Intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263: 1711–1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, J. A., and Zeh, D. W. (1997). The evolution of polyandry II: Post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinner, D., and Deschner, T. (2000). Sexual swellings in female hamadryas baboons after male take-overs: “deceptive” swellings as a possible female counter-strategy against infanticide. Am. J. Primatol. 52: 157–168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Zoologie und Anthropologie, Universität Göttingen, Berlinerstr. 28, D-37073, Göttingen, Germany

    Andreas Paul

Authors
  1. Andreas Paul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paul, A. Sexual Selection and Mate Choice. International Journal of Primatology 23, 877–904 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015533100275

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015533100275

Search

Navigation