Skip to main content
Log in

The Foucauldian Detour: A Rebirth of Organization Theory?

  • Published:
Human Relations

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • DELEUZE, G. Foucault. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • DELEUZE, G. Qu'est-ce qu'un dispositif? in Foucault philosophe. Paris Seuil: Rencontre Internationale, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOUCAULT, M. Histoire de la sexualité 2. L'usage des plaisirs. Paris: Nrf Gallimard, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • HATCHUEL, A., & WEIL, B. (1995), Experts in organisations. A knowledge based perspective on organisational change. Berlin, New-York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • HATCHUEL, A. Comment penser l'action collective? Théorie des mythes rationnels. In R. Damien and A. Tosel (Eds.), L'action collective. Coordination, planification conseil. Besançon: Annales Littéraires de l'Université de Franche Comté, pp. 177–202.

  • KNIGHTS, D., & VURDUBAKIS, T. Foucault, power, resistance and all that. In J.M. Jernier, D. Knights, and W. R. Nord (Eds.), Resistance and Power in organisations. London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEWTON, T. Theorizing subjectivity in organizations: The failure of foucauldian studies. Organization studies, 1988, 19(3), 415–448.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hatchuel, A. The Foucauldian Detour: A Rebirth of Organization Theory?. Human Relations 52, 507–519 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016913709308

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016913709308

Keywords

Navigation