Abstract
The central role of fish in lake restoration and management has a practical purpose: fish are much easier to manipulate than nutrients, phytoplankton and zooplankton, and therefore they are a relatively easy (additional) instrument in restoration and management. The management of the fish stock may be a measure of water quality, of fish stock composition or a measure of both and may vary from very drastic removal of planktivorous and benthivorous fish to a more gradual change in the population by continual predator management and less drastic reduction of inedible prey. For lake restoration, drastic removal is the most efficient in order to obtain clear water and vegetation and a subsequent fish community adapted to this. Continual management will result in a more gradual change and may be more acceptable to the interest of both fishermen and water quality managers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson, G., H. Berggren, G. Cronberg & C. Gelin, 1978. Effects of planktivorous and benthivorous fish on organisms and water chemistry in eutrophic lakes. Hydrobiologia 59: 9–15.
Andersson G., 1984. The influence of fish on eutrophic lake ecosystems. In 1st. Nordic Symposium on Limnology Apr. 1984. Norwegian Soc. Limnol., Fagerfjell, Norway.
Benndorf, J., H. Kneschke, K. Kossatz & E. Penz, 1984. Manipulation of the pelagic food web by stocking with predacious fishes. Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 69: 407–428.
Benndorf, J., H. Schultz, A. Benndorf, R. Unger, E. Penz, H. Kneschke, K. Kossatz, R. Dumke & U. Hornig, 1988. Food-web manipulation by enhancement of piscivorous fish stocks: longterm effects in the hypertrophic Bautzen Reservoir. Limnologica 19: 97–110.
Benndorf, J., 1990. Conditions for effective biomanipulation; conclusions derived from whole-lake experiments in Europe. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 187–203.
Berg, S., E. Jeppesen, M. Sondergaard & E. Mortensen, 1994. Environmental effects of introducing whitefish, Coregonus lavaretus (L), in Lake Ring. Hydrobiologia 276: 71–79.
Jensen, J. P., E. Brabrand & B. Faafeng, 1993. Habitat shift in roach (Rutilus rutilus) induced by pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca) introduction – predation risk versus pelagic behaviour. Oecologia 95: 38–46.
Breukelaar, A.W., E. H. R. R., Lammens & J. G. Breteler, 1994. Effects of benthivorous bream (Abramis brama) and carp (Cyprinus carpio) on sediment resuspension and concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll-a. Freshwat. Biol. 32: 113–121.
Brooks, J. L. & S. I. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size and composition of plankton. Science. 150: 28–35.
Carpenter, S. R. (eds), 1988. Complex Interactions in Lake Communities. Springer-Verlag, New York: 283 pp.
Cazemier, W. G., 1983. The growth of bream Abramis brama in relation to habitat and population density. Hydrobiol. Bull. 16: 269–278.
Chapman, L. J., W. C., Mackay & C. W., Wilkinson, 1989. Feeding flexibility in northern pike (Esox lucius): fish versus invertebrate prey. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 46: 666–669.
Dam, E. M. van & C. Breukers. 1995. Natuurontwikkelingen Volkerak-Zoommeer 1993. RIZA Nota 95.022.
Dziekonska, J., 1954. The feeding characteristics of mature pike, perch and pikeperch in lakes. Polskie Archievum Hydrobiologii 2: 165–183.
Eklov, P. & L. Persson. 1996. The response of prey to the risk of predation: Proximate cues for refuging juvenile fish. An. Behav. 51: 105–115.
Gulati, R. D., E. H. R. R. Lammens, M.-L. Meijer & E. van Donk (eds), 1990. Biomanipulation – Tool forWater Management. Developments in Hydrobiology 61. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 628 pp. Reprinted from Hydrobiologia 200/201.
Grimm, M. P., 1981. Intraspecific predation as a principal factor controlling the biomass of northern pike (Esox lucius L). Fish. mgmt 12: 77–80.
Grimm, M. P., 1981. The composition of northern pike (Esox lucius L.) populations in four shallow waters in the Netherlands, with special reference to factors influencing 0+ pike biomass. Fish. mgmt 12: 61–76.
Hosper, S. H. & M.-L., Meijer., 1992. Handleiding Aktief Biologisch Beheer.
Hosper, S. H. & M.-L., Meijer, 1993. Biomanipulation, will it work for your lake? A simple test for the assessment of chances for clear water, following drastic fish–stock reduction in shallow, eutrophic lakes. Ecol. Eng.: 63–72.
Houthuizen, R. P., J. J. Backx & A. D. Buijse. 1993. Exceptionally rapid growth and early maturation of perch in a freshwater lake recently converted from an estuary. J. Fish Biol. 43: 320–324.
Hrbacek, J., M. Dvorakova, V. Korinek & L. Prochazkova, 1961. Demonstration of the effect of the fish stock on the species composition of zooplankton and the intensity of metabolism of the whole plankton association. Verh. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 14: 192–195.
Jeppesen, E., K. Olrik & P. Kristensen, 1994. Impact of nutrients and physical factors on the shift from cyanobacterial to chlorophyte dominance in shallow Danish lakes. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 51: 1692–1699.
Jeppesen, E., M. Sø ndergaard, O. Sortkjaer, E. Mortensen & P. Kristensen, 1990. Interactions between phytoplankton zooplankton and fish in a shallow hypertrophic lake a study of phytoplankton collapses in lake Sobygard Denmark. Hydrobiologia 191: 149–164.
Jeppesen, E., J. P. Jensen, M. Sø ndergaard, T. L. Lauridsen, L. J. Pedersen & L. Jensen, 1997. Top–down control in freshwater lakes: the role of nutrient state, submerged macrophytes and water depth. Hydrobiologia 342/343 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 119): 151–164.
Kerfoot, W. C. & A. Sih, 1987. Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, 386 pp.
Lamarra Jr., V. A., 1975. Digestive activities of carp as a major contributor to the nutrient loading of lakes. Verh. int. Verein. Limnol. 19: 2461–2468.
Lammens, E. H., H.W. deNie, J. Vijverberg & W. L. T. vanDensen, 1985. Resource partitioning and niche shifts of bream (Abramis brama) and eel (Anguilla anguilla) mediated by predation of smelt (Osmerus eperlanus) on Daphnia hyalina. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 42: 1342–1351.
Lammens, E. H., 1989. Causes and consequences of the success of bream in Dutch eutrophic lakes. Hydrobiol. Bull. 23: 11–18.
Lammens, E. H., W. L. T. van Densen & R. Knijn. 1990. The fish community structure in Tjeukemeer in relation to fishery and habitat utilization. J. Fish Biol. 36: 933–945.
Lammens, E. H. & W. Hoogenboezem, 1991. Diets and feeding behaviour. In I. Winfield & Nelson (eds), The Biology of Cyprinid Fishes. Chapman and Hall, London: 353–376.
Lammens, E. H., M. Scheffer & E. van Nes, 1996. PISCATOR, a model for the interaction between fish stock and fishery in Ijsselmeer and Markermeer. Version 0.0. Werkdocument 96, 123 pp.
Ligtvoet, W., 1993. Visstandsontwikkeling Volkerak-Zoommeer 1987–1997: scenario voor het eutrof ieringsproces?: 108–115.
Ligtvoet, W., et al. 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995. Omvang en samenstelling van de visstand in november 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994. Rapport Boz. 81.1, 81.2, 81.3, 81.7, 81.17, 81.20. Witteveen and Bos Raadgevende ingenieurs b.v., Deventer.
Meijer, M.-L., E. H. Lammens, A. J. P. Raat, M. P. Grimm & S. H. Hosper, 1990. Impact of cyprinids on zooplankton and algae in ten drainable ponds; preliminary results. Hydrobiologia 191: 275–284.
Meijer, M.-L., M. W. De Haan, A. W. Breukelaar & H. Buiteveld, 1990. Is reduction of the benthivorous fish an important cause of high transparency following biomanipulation in shallow lakes? Hydrobiologia 200–201: 303–316.
Meijer, M.-L., E. H. Van Nes, E. H. Lammens, & R. D. Gulati, 1994a. The consequences of a drastic fish stock reduction in the large and shallow lake Wolderwijd, the Netherlands – Can we understand what happened? Hydrobiologia 276: 31–42.
Meijer, M.-L., E. Jeppesen, E. van donk, B. Moss, M. Scheffer, E. Lammens, E. Vannes, J. A. Vanberkum, G. J. Dejong, B. A. Faafeng & Jensen, 1994b. Long-term responses to fish–stock reduction in small shallow lakes – interpretation of 5-year results of biomanipulation cases in the Netherlands and Denmark. Hydrobiologia 276: 457–466.
Meijer, M.-L, E. H. Lammens, J. P. G. Klein-Breteler & M. P. Grimm, 1996. Development of fish communities after biomanipulation. Neth. Jo. of aquat. Ecol. 29: 91–103.
Moss, B., J. Madgwick & G. Philips, 1996. A guide to the restoration of nutrient enriched shallow lakes. Broads Authority / Environment Agency.
Nilsson, N.-A. & B. Pejler, 1973. On the relation between fish fauna and zooplankton composition in North Swedish lakes. Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res. Drottningholm 53: 51–78.
Nilsson N. A., 1980. The role of size-based predation in competition and interactive segregation in fish. In S. D. Gerking (ed.), Ecology of Freshwater Fish Production. Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford: 303–325.
Persson, L., S. Diehl, L. Johansson & G. Andersson, 1991. Shifts in fish communities along the productivity gradient of temperate lakes: patterns and the importance of size-structured interactions. J. Fish Biol. 38: 281–294.
Persson, L., L. Johansson, G. Andersson, S. Diehl & S. F. Hamrin, 1993. Density dependent interactions in lake ecosystems: whole lake perturbation experiments. Oikos 66: 193–208.
Popova, O. A. & L. A. Sytina, 1977. Food and feeding relations of Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) and pikeperch (Stizstedion lucioperca) in various waters of the USSR. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 34: 1559–1570.
Savino, J. F. & R. A., Stein, 1989. Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open waters and dense vegetation. Envn. Biol. Fishes 24: 287–293.
Scheffer, M., S. H. Hosper, M.-L. Meijer & B. Moss, 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution: 275–279.
Schriver, P., J. Bogestrand, E. Jeppesen & M. Sondergaard, 1995. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplanktonphytoplankton interactions: large-scale enclosure experiments in a shallow eutrophic lake. Freshwat. Biol. 33: 255–270.
Stenson, J. A. E., T. Bohlin, L. Henrikson, B. I. Nilsson, H. G. Nyman, H. G. Oscarson & P. Larsson, 1978. Effects of fish removal from a small lake. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 20: 794–801.
Ten Winkel, E. H. & J. T. Meulemans, 1984. Effects of fish upon sumerged vegetation. Hydrobiol. Bull. 18: 157–158.
Timms, R. M. & B. Moss, 1984. Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing in the presence of zoo planktivorous fish in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 472–486.
Van Donk, E., M. P. Grimm, R. D. Gulati, P. G. M. Heuts, W. A. de Kloet & E. van Liere, 1990. First attempt to apply wholelake food-web manipulation on a large scale in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia 200/201 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 61): 291–303.
Van Donk, E., M. P. Grimm, R. D. Gulati & J. P. G. Klein Breteler, 1990. Whole-lake food-web manipulation as a means to study community interactions in a small ecosystem. Hydrobiologia 200/201 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 61): 275–290.
Van Donk, E. & R. D. Gulati, 1995. Transition of a lake to turbid state six years after biomanipulation: mechanisms and pathways. Wat. Sci. Technol. 32: 197–206.
Willemsen, J., 1977. Population dynamics of percids in Lake Ijssel and some smaller lakes in the Netherlands. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 34: 1710–1719.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lammens, E.H.R.R. The central role of fish in lake restoration and management. Hydrobiologia 395, 191–198 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017053719871
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017053719871