Skip to main content
Log in

Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the breeding of self-pollinating crops, crossing creates variation upon which selection is exerted. If the value of crosses cannot be predicted then this uncertainty means that many crosses need to be made. However, since there is a limit to the capacity of a breeding programme, more numerous crosses result in each cross having a small population size, fewer progenies in later generations and a lower probability of recovering good genotypes from each cross. Published theory on the optimum number of crosses in a plant breeding programme, for a predominantly self-pollinating crop, usually assumes that all crosses are equal value. This overestimates the number of crosses required. When the optimum size of a population in a favourable cross is considered, theory predicts that very large populations are desirable. The required population size is even larger if linkage of loci controlling different traits is also considered. Hence, in an inbreeding crop, one possible strategy is to select a small number of crosses that are considered favourable and produce large populations from them to increase the probability of recovering superior genotypes. In an out breeding crop, the analogy is a few composites with large population sizes. This low-cross-number strategy is ideally suited to the particular constraints and advantages of participatory plant breeding. Such an approach, although not essential, may still be advantageous in classical breeding. When a breeding programme is based on few crosses, which parents are chosen is crucial and farmer participatory methods are highly effective in narrowing the choice. Modified bulk population breeding methods, and recurrent selection are desirable strategies in the participatory plant breeding of self-pollinating crops when combined with a low-cross-number approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, R.W., 1999. Principles of Plant Breeding, Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baenziger, P.S. & C.J. Peterson, 1992. Genetic variation: Its origin and use for breeding self-pollinated species. In: H.T. Stalker & J.P. Murphy (Eds.), Plant Breeding in the 1990's, pp. 69–92. CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, J. & F.G.H. Lupton, 1987. Production of new varieties: an integrated research approach to plant breeding. In: F.G.H. Lupton (Ed.),Wheat Breeding, pp. 487–537. Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J.E. & G.R. Mackay, 1994. Breeding strategies for clonally propagated potatoes. In: J.E. Bradshaw & G.R. Mackay (Eds.), Potato genetics, pp. 467–497. CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, G.W., 1951. The adptability and breeding of suitable grasses for the Southeastern states. Adv Agron 3: 197–241.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, R.H. & D.D. Stuthman, 1990. Self-pollinated crop breeding: Concepts and successes. In: J.P. Gustafon (Ed.), Gene Manipulation in Plant Improvement II. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byerlee, D. & P.W. Heisey, 1990. Wheat varietal diversification over time and space as factors in yield gains and rust resistance in the Punjab. In: P.W. Heisey (Ed.), Accelerating the Transfer of Wheat Breeding Gains to Farmers: A Study of the Dynamics of Varietal Replacement in Pakistan, pp. 5–24. CIMMYT Research Report No. 1. International Centre for Wheat and Maize Improvement, Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, B.F. & R.F. Bruns, 1993. Emergence of alternative breeding methods for allogamous crops. In: B.C. Imrie & J.B. Hacker (Eds.), Proceedings: Volume 1. Tenth Australian Plant Breeding Conference, Gold Coast, 18–23 April 1993, pp. 43–56. Australian Convention and Travel Services, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., W. Erskine, J. Hamblin & S. Grando, 1994. Genotype environment interaction and international breeding programmes. Expl Agric 30: 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delzer, B.W., R.H. Busch & G.A. Hareland, 1995. Recurrent selection for grain protein in hard red spring wheat. Crop Sci 35: 730–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudley, J.W. & R.J. Lambert, 1992. Ninety generations of selection for oil and protein in maize. Maydica 37: 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahim, M., M.P. Dhanapala, D. Senadhira & M.J. Lawrence, 1998. Quantitative genetics of rice. II. A comparison of the efficiency of four breeding methods. Field Crops Res 55: 275–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, S.N., A. Joshi & J.R. Witcombe, in press. Participatory crop improvement in maize in Gujarat, India. In: Proc Int Symp on Participatory Plant Breeding and Participatory Plant Genetic Resource Enhancement: An Exchange of Experience from South and South East Asia held at Pokhara, Nepal from 1 to 5 May 2000. CGIAR System Wide Programme on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation.

  • Hanson, H., N.E. Borlaug & R.G. Anderson, 1982. Wheat in the Third World, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. pp. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, P.M, D.F. Marshall & D.J. Lydiate, 1996. Towards developing intervarietal substitution lines in Brassica napus using marker-assisted selection. Genome 39: 348–358.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huehn, M., 1996. Optimum number of crosses and progeny per cross in breeding self fertilizing crops. I. General approach and first numerical results. Euphytica 91: 365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICRISAT, 1997. Southern and Eastern Africa Region Highlights 1996, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-arid Tropics, Patancheru.

  • IPGRI, 1996. Proceedings of the IDRC/IPGRI Workshop on Participatory Plant Breeding, 28–30 July, International Agricultural Research Centre, Wageningen. P. Eyzaguirre & M. Iwanaga (Eds.), International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRRI, 1985. Parentage of IRR1 crosses IR1 - IR 50,000. The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Philippines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, R.C., 1992. On the selection for specific genes in doubled haploids. Heredity 69: 92–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. II. Participatory varietal selection, a case study in India. Expl Agric 32: 461–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. & J.R. Witcombe, 1998. Farmer participatory approaches for varietal improvement. In: J.R. Witcombe, D.S. Virk & J. Farrington (Eds.), Seeds of Choice-making the most of new varieties for small farmers. Oxford IBH, New Delhi and Intermediate Technology Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C.J., J.R. Witcombe, T.S. Pittaway, M. Nash, C.T. Hash, C.S. Busso & M.D. Gale, 1994. An RFLP-based genetic map of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Theor Appl Genet 89: 481–487.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. & B. Walsh, 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maredia, M.K. & D. Byerlee (Eds.), 1999. The global wheat improvement system: prospects for enhancing efficiency in the presence of spillovers. CIMMYT Research Report No. 5. International Centre for Wheat and Maize Improvement, Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. & B.J. Harrison, 1949. The manifold effect of selection. Heredity 3: 1–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, J.R., 1994. Principles and Practice of Plant Breeding, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, N.W., 1981. Principles of crop improvement, 2nd ed., Longman Group Ltd.

  • Sthapit, B.R., K.D. Joshi & J.R. Witcombe, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. III. Fanner participatory plant breeding in Nepal. Expl Agric 32: 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talukdar, B.S., A.M. Rao, P.P. Prakash Babu & J.R. Witcombe, 1998. Registration of ICMR 501 pearl millet topcross pollinator parental line. Crop Sci 38: 576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troyer, A.F., 1996. Breeding widely adapted, popular maize hybrids. Euphytica 92: 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oeveren, A.J., 1992. A comparison between single seed descent and early cross selection in wheat breeding. II. The evaluative generations. Euphytica 64: 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, W.E., 1979. Number and size of cross progenies from a constant total number of plants manageable in a breeding program. Euphytica 28: 453–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., A. Joshi, K.D. Joshi & B.R. Sthapit, 1996. Farmer participatory crop improvement. I: Varietal selection and breeding methods and their impact on biodiversity. Expl Agric 32: 445–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., M.N.V.R. Rao & W. Lechner, 1995. Registration of ICMV 88908 grain cultivar of pearl millet. Crop Sci 35: 1216–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., M.N.V.R. Rao, A.G.B. Raj & C.T. Hash, 1997. Registration of ICMV 88904 pearl millet. Crop Sci 37: 1022–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., 1999. Do farmer-participatory methods apply more to high potential areas than to marginal ones? Outlook on Agriculture 28: 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witcombe, J.R., M. Subedi & K.D. Joshi, in press. Towards a practical plant breeding strategy in predominantly self-pollinated crops. In: Proc Int Symp on Participatory Plant Breeding and Participatory Plant Genetic Resource Enhancement: An Exchange of Experience from South and South East Asia held at Pokhara, Nepal from 1 to 5 May 2000. CGIAR System Wide Programme on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation.

  • Wood, D. & J.M. Lenné, 1997. The conservation of agrobiodiversity on-farm: questioning the emerging paradigm. Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wricke, G. & W.E. Weber, 1986. Quantitative Genetics and Selection in Plant Breeding, W. de Gruyter, Berlin - New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa, K. & H. Yamagata, 1978. On the number and size of cross combinations in a breeding programme of self-fertilizing crops. Euphytica 27: 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa, K., K. Yano, T. Ishii & T. Nomura, 1999. A theoretical basis for measuring the efficiency of selection in plant breeding. Heredity 82: 401–408.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, J.H., P. Stephenson, D.A. Laurie, W. Li, D. Tang, M.T. Jackson & M.D. Gale, 1999. Towards rice genome scanning by map-based AFLP fingerprinting. Mol Gen Genet 261: 184–195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Witcombe, J., Virk, D. Number of crosses and population size for participatory and classical plant breeding. Euphytica 122, 451–462 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017524122821

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017524122821

Navigation