Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Perception of Sexual Harassment in Higher Education: Impact of Gender and Attractiveness

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This experimental study used an ambiguous sexualharassment scenario, and manipulated gender and level ofphysical attractiveness within a perpetrator/victimdyad. The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of sexual harassment of maleand female students as well as perceptions ofperpetrator and victim character traits. Twohundred-ninety six male and 295 female undergraduate andgraduate students at a large urban university were askedto read the scenario and describe behavior and charactertraits for perpetrator and victim using a seven-pointsemantic differential scale. Eighty-four percent (n = 495) of the sample were White, 5.3% (n =31) were African American, 5.9% (n = 39) were ofHispanic origin, and 4.7% (n = 28) marked other forrace/ethnicity. Results indicate that female studentsperceived the scenario as more sexually harassing thanmale students. However, both men and women judged femaleperpetrators less harshly than male perpetrators. Bothmen and women were influenced by perpetrator attractiveness: they perceived an attractiveopposite gender perpetrator as less harassing than asame gender attractive perpetrator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barak, A., Fisher, W. A., & Houston, S. (1992). Individual difference correlate s of the experience of sexual harassment among female university students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 17-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursik, K. (1992). Perceptions of sexual harassment in an academic context. Sex Roles, 27, 410-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caste llow, W. A., Wuensch, K. L., & Moore, C. H. (1990). Effects of physical attractiveness of the plaintiff and defendant in sexual harassment judgements. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 547-562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellow, W. A., Chia, R., & Wuensch, K. L. (1988, August). Physical attractiven ess, sex, and cultural differences in juridic decisions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Atlanta, GA.

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but...: A meta-analytic review of re search on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 109-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efran, M. B. (1974). The effects of physical appe arance on the judgement of guild, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 45-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, S., Barak, A., & Pinto, A. (1991). Mode rating e ffects of personal cognitions on experienced and perceived sexual harassment of women at the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1320-1337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1992). Good-looking people are not what we think. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 304-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (1989). The dimensions of sexual harassment: A structural analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35, 309-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., & Ormerod, A. J. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and academic context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 281-294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervasio, A., & Ruckdeschel, K. (1992). College students' judgements of verbal sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 190-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, M. (1993). Academic psychologists' responses to unethical behavior in colleagues: A Survey. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

  • Huberty, C. J., & Morris, J. D. (1989). Multivariate analysis versus multiple univariate analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 302-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., Kanouse, D. E., Kelley, H. H., Nisbett, R. E., Valins, S., & Weinner, B. (1972). Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S., & Remland, M. S. (1992). Source s of variability in perceptions of and re sponses to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 27, 121-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher' s handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Casey, R. J., & Sawin, D. B. (1995). Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Developmental Psychology, 31, 464-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malovich, N. J., & Stake, J. E. (1990). Sexual harassment on campus: Individual difference s in attitudes and beliefs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 63-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, M. A., & Nelson, E. S. (1993). Sexual harassment on campus: Effects of professor gender on perception of sexually harassing behaviors. Sex Roles, 28, 207-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popovich, P. M., Gehlauf, D. N., Jolton, J. A., Somers, J. M., & Godinho, R. M. (1992). Perceptions of sexual harassment as a function of sex of rater and incident form and consequence. Sex Roles, 27, 609-625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B., & Day, J. D. (1988). Interpretations of sexual harassment: An attributional analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 405-417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., & Lees, P. L. (1984). Attraction and harassment: Dynamics of sexual politics in the workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 6, 35-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, M. E., Lott, B., & Gallogly, S. M. (1986). Sexual harassment of university students. Sex Roles, 15, 333-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritts, V., Patterson, M. L., & Tubbs, M. E. (1992). Expectations, impressions, and judgments of physically attractive students: A review. Review of Educational Research, 62, 413-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, L. J., & Borgers, S. B. (1990). Sexual harassment in Universities during the 1980s. Sex Roles, 23, 397-411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, M. S. (1993). The role of sexual misperceptions of women's friendliness in an emerging theory of sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 84-101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R. J., & Myklebust, K. (1992). The influence of a history of romance on judgments and responses to a complaint of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 27, 345-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tata, J. (1993). The structure and phenomenon of sexual harassment: Impact of category of sexually harassing behavior, gender, and hierarchical level. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 199-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1987). A hierarchy of sexual harassment. Journal of Psychology, 121, 599-605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomann, D. A., & Wiener, R. L. (1987). Physical and psychological causality as determinants of culpability in sexual harassment cases. Sex Roles, 17, 573-591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Till, F. (1980). Sexual harassment: A report on the sexual harassment of students. Washington, DC: National Advisory Council on Women' s Educational Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. B., & Cyr, R. R. (1992). Escalating commitment to a relationship: The sexual harassment trap. Sex Roles, 27, 47-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, K. M. (1989). Defining sexual harassment in workplaces: A policy-capturing approach. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 830-850.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Michela A. Larocca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeffrey D. Kromrey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larocca, M.A., Kromrey, J.D. The Perception of Sexual Harassment in Higher Education: Impact of Gender and Attractiveness. Sex Roles 40, 921–940 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018829222894

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018829222894

Keywords

Search

Navigation