Abstract
As employees continue to lie, cheat, and steal from their employers, researchers have tried to help managers understand and possibly predict such deviant behavior. This study considers the specific employee misconduct of ethical rule breaking. Hirschi (1969) suggested that deviant behavior can be better understood by social bonding theory. The social bonding model includes four elements; attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. It is proposed that Hirschi's social bonding theory can be used to understand ethical rule breaking by employees. Using a sample of 200 employees, the results indicate that the social bonding elements of attachment and involvement can be used to better understand the reported likelihood of ethical rule breaking of employees. Recommendations for better applying the social bonding model to ethical rule breaking are suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albanese, J. S.: 1984, ‘Corporate Criminology: Explaining Deviance of Business and Political Organizations’, Journal of Criminal Justice 12(1), 11-19.
Cook, J. D., S. J. Hepworth, T. D. Wall and P. B. Warr: 1981, The Experience of Work: A Compendium and Review of 249 Measures and their Use(Academic Press, London).
Gottfredson, M. R. and R. Hirschi: 1990, A General Theory of Crime(Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA).
Hirschi, T.: 1969, Causes of Delinquency(University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
Hollinger, R. C.: 1986, ‘Acts Against the Workplace: Social Bonding and Employee Deviance’, Deviant Behavior 7(1), 53-75.
Hollinger, R. C. and J. Clark: 1982, ‘Formal and Informal Social Controls of Employee Deviance’, The Sociological Quarterly 23, 333-343.
MacLean, T. L.: August 1999, Thick as Thieves: A Social Embeddedness Model of Rule Breaking in Organizations. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meeting, Social Issues Division, Chicago, IL.
McGee, G. W. and R. C. Ford: 1987, ‘Two (or More?) Dimensions of Organizational Commitment: Reexamination of the Affective and Continuance Commitment Scales’, Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 638-642.
Meyer, J. P., S. V. Paunonen, I. R. Gellatly, R. D. Goffin and D. Jackson: 1989, ‘Organizational Commitment and Job Performance: It's the Nature of Commitment that Counts’, Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 152-156.
Raelin, J. A.: 1986, ‘An Analysis of Professional Deviance Within Organizations’, Human Relations 39(12), 1103-1129.
Raelin, J. A.: 1994, ‘Three Scales of Professional Deviance Within Organizations’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 15(6), 483-501.
Robinson, S. L. and R. J. Bennett: 1995, ‘A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study’, Academy of Management Journal 38(2), 555-572.
Robinson, S. L. and J. Greenberg: 1998, ‘Employees Behaving Badly: Dimensions, Determinants and Dilemmas in the Study of Workplace Deviance’, Trends in Organizational Behavior 5, 1-30.
Seashore, S. E., E. E. Lawler, P. Mirvis and C. Cammann (eds.): 1982, Observing and Measuring Organizational Change: A Guide to Field Practice(Wiley, New York).
Shore, L. M., L. A. Newton and G. C. Thornton: 1990, ‘Job and Organizational Attitudes in Relation to Employee Behavioral Intentions’, Journal of Organizational Behavior 11, 57-67.
Sims, R. L.: 1999, ‘The Development of Six Ethical Business Dilemmas’, The Leadership & Organization Development Journal 20(4), 189-197.
Szwajkowski, E.: 1989, ‘Lessons for the Consultant from Research on Employee Misconduct’, Consultation: An International Journal 8(3), 181-190.
Weiss, D. J., R. V. Dawis, G. W. England and L. H. Lofquist: 1967, Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire(Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sims, R.L. Ethical Rule Breaking by Employees: A Test of Social Bonding Theory. Journal of Business Ethics 40, 101–109 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020330801847
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020330801847