Abstract
The main focus of this paper ison ways in which Kantian philosophy can informproponents and opponents of constructivismalike. Kant was primarily concerned withreconciling natural and moral law. His approachto this general problematic was to limit andseparate what we can know about things(phenomena) from things as they are inthemselves (noumena), and to identify moralagency with the latter. Revisiting the Kantianproblematic helps to address and resolve longstanding epistemological concerns regardingconstructivism as an educational philosophy inrelation to issues of objectivity andsubjectivity, the limits of theoretical andpractical reason, and the relation betweenhuman experience and the world. It also servesto address ethical concerns regardingliberation from limited self-interests andcontexts conditioned by localised beliefs andinclinations. In light of revisiting theKantian problematic, both Glasersfeld's radicalview of constructivism and Jardine's socialcritique of constructivism are found wanting.Beyond constructivism, Kant's distinctionbetween phenomena and noumena and the limits ofreason that follow from it are brieflyconsidered in terms of Merleau-Ponty's noveldouble-embodied notion of flesh as anontological primitive – as a matter of beingboth in, and of, the world – with an aim tomore intimate connections between epistemologyand ethics.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Appelbaum, D. (1995). The vision of Kant. Rockport, MA: The Spirit of Philosophy Series, Element Books Ltd.
Aviram, A. (2000). Beyond constructivism: Autonomy-oriented education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 19(5/6), 465–489 (2000).
Brook, A. (1994). Kant and the mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, S.R. (1998). Preservice teachers' understanding of elementary number theory: Qualitative constructivist research situated within a Kantian framework for under-standing educational inquiry. Doctoral Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver BC.
Campbell, S.R. (2001). Enacting possible worlds: Making sense of (human) nature. In J.P. Matos, W. Blum, K. Houston and S.P. Carreira (Eds), Modelling and mathematics education, ICTMA 9: Applications in science and technology (pp. 3–14). London: Horwood Publishing.
Case, R. (1972) Piaget's theory of child development. Orbit, 3(4), 8–11.
Coffa, A. and Wessels, L. (1991). The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna station. New York NY: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Dewey, J. (1966/1916). Democracy and education. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Fabricius, W.V. (1983). Piaget's theory of knowledge: Its philosophical context. Human Development, 26(6), 325–334.
Fenstermacher, G. et al. (1987). Symposium on practical knowledge and teacher education. Educational Theory, 37(4), 357–421.
Gardner, H. (1985). The mind's new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Garrison, J. (2000). Afterword. Educational Theory, 50(2), 275–276.
Glasersfeld, E. v. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: The Falmer Press.
Glasersfeld, E. v. (1998). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. In M.R. Matthews (Ed.), Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination (pp. 11–30). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Howe, K.R. and Berv, J. (2000). Constructing constructivism, epistemological and pedagogical. In D.C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 19–40). Chicago IL: The National Society for the Study of Education.
Jardine, D.W. (1992). Immanuel Kant, Jean Piaget and the rage for order: Ecological hints of the colonial spirit in pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 24(1), 28–43.
Jaspers, K. (1957/1962). Kant. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace & Company.
Kant, I. (1952/1790). Critique of judgement. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Kant, I. (1953/1783). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to present itself as a science. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
Kant, I. (1964/1785). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Kant, I. (1965/1787). Critique of pure reason. New York, NY: St Martin's Press.
Kant, I. (1996/1797). The netaphysics of morals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1997/1788). Critique of practical reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kessels, J.P.A.M. and Korthagen, F.A.J. (1996). The relationship between theory and practice: Back to the classics. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 17–22.
Kilpatrick, J. (1987). What constructivism might be in mathematics education. In J.C. Bergeron, N. Herscovics and C. Kieran (Eds), The proceedings of the eleventh international conference of the psychology of mathematics education (vol. 1, pp. 3–27). Montréal Canada: Université de Montréal.
Kitcher, P. (1990). Kant's transcendental psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. Journal of Philosophy, 70(8), 630–646.
Kröner, S. (Ed.) (1974). Practical reason. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Mann, W.E. (1995). Mysticism. In R. Audi (Ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of philosophy (pp. 515–516). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Matthews, M. (1992). Old wine in new bottles: A problem with constructivist epistemology. Philosophy of education. Urbana, IL: Philosophy of Education Society, available on-line: www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-Yearbook/92_docs/Matthews.HTM
Matthews, M. (2000). Appraising constructivism in science and mathematics education. In D.C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp. 161–192). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Morgan, D. (2000). Kant trouble: The obscurities of the enlightened. London, UK: Routledge.
Noddings, N. (2000/1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. In R.F. Reed and T.W. Johnson (Eds), Philosophical documents in education (pp. 247–257). New York, NY: Longman.
Park, Y. (1997). Rationality and human dignity-Confucius, Kant and Scheffler on the ultimate aim of education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 16(1/2), 7–18.
Phillips, D.C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5–12.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (Ed.) (1980). Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1967). Husserl: An analysis of his phenomenology. Evanston, IL: North-western University Press.
Rumelhart, D.E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J.L. and Hinton, G.E. (1987). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart and P.R. Group (Eds), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (vol. 2, pp. 7–57). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Tellings, A. (1998). A virtue approach instead of a Kantian approach as a solution to major dilemmas in meta-ethics? A criticism of David Carr. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 17(1), 47–56.
Warnock, G.J. (1985/1964). Kant. In D.J. O'Conner (Ed.), A critical history of Western philosophy. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Campbell, S.R. Constructivism and the Limits of Reason: Revisiting the Kantian Problematic. Studies in Philosophy and Education 21, 421–445 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020844323677
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020844323677