Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Floristic diversity of Mexican seasonally dry tropical forests

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Studies of the variation in tropical plant species diversity and itsrelationship with environmental factors are largely based on research intropical moist/wet forests. Seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTFs), incontrast, have been poorly investigated. In this paper we present data from 20Mexican SDTF sites sampled to describe the magnitude of floristic diversity inthese forests and to address the following questions: (i) to what extent isspecies diversity related to rainfall? (ii) Are there other climatic variablesthat explain variation in species diversity in SDTFs? (iii) How does speciesidentity vary spatially (species turnover) within the country? We found thatspecies diversity was consistently greater (a ca. twofold difference) than wouldbe expected according to the sites' precipitation. Rainfall did notsignificantly explain the variation in species diversity. Likewise, the numberof dry and wet months per year was unrelated to species diversity. In contrast,a simple measure of potential evapotranspiration (Thornthwaite's index)significantly explained the variation in species diversity. In addition to thegreat diversity of species per site (local diversity), species turnover wasconsiderable: of a total of 917 sampled species, 72% were present only in asingle site and the average similarity (Sorensen's index) among sites wasonly 9%. These aspects of floristic diversity and the high deforestation ratesof these forests in Mexico indicate that conservation efforts should be directedto tropical forests growing in locations of low and seasonal rainfall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alley W.M. 1984. The Palmer drought severity index: limitations and assumptions. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology 23: 1100–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arriaga L. and Leon J.L. 1989. The Mexican tropical deciduous forest of Baja California Sur: a floristic and structural approach. Vegetatio 84: 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A. and Medina E. (eds) 1995. Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clinebell R.R., Phillips O.L., Gentry A.H., Stark N. and Zuuring H. 1995. Prediction of neotropical tree and liana species richness from soil and climatic data. Biodiversity and Conservation 4: 56–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell J.H. and Orias E. 1964. The ecological regulation of species diversity. American Naturalist 98: 399–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie D.J. and Paquin V.I. 1987. Large scale biogeographical patterns of species richness of tree. Nature 329: 326–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirzo R. and Gomez G. 1996. Ritmos temporales de la investigacion taxonomica de plantas vasculares en Mexico y una estimacion del numero de especies conocidas. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 83: 396–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher A.G. 1960. Latitudinal variation in organic diversity. Evolution 14: 64–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry A.H. 1982. Patterns of Neotropical plant species diversity. Evolutionary Biology 15: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry A.H. 1988. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry A.H. 1991. The distribution and evolution of climbing plants. In: Putz C.E. and Mooney H.A. (eds), The Biology of Vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK pp. 3–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry A.H. 1995. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In: Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A. and Medina E. (eds), Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 146–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie T.W., Grijalva A. and Farris Ch.N. 2000. Diversity, composition, and structure of tropical dry forests in Central America. Plant Ecology 14: 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood V.H. and Watson R.T. 1995. Global Biodiversity Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdridge L. 1967. Life Zone Ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell S.P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance and diversity in tropical dry forest. Science 203: 1299–1309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston M.A. 1994. Biological Diversity. The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen D. 1988. Tropical dry forest. The most endangered major tropical ecosystems. In: Wilson E.O. (ed.), Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp. 130–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlman B. and Sanchez-Colon S. 1984. Estudio aerografico del genero Bursera en Mexico. In: Ezcurra E., Equihua M., Colman B. and Sanchez-Colon S. (eds), Metodos cuantitativos en la Biogeograf?a. Instituto de Ecolog?a, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott E.J., Bullock S.H. and Solis-Magallanes J.A. 1987. Floristic diversity and structure of upland and arroyo forests of coastal Jalisco. Biotropica 19: 228–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundell C.L. and Lundell A.A. 1983. The flora of northern Yucatan and Coba area of Quintana Roo, Mexico. Collections and observations in 1938. Wrightia 7: 97–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur R. 1965. Patterns of species diversity. Biological Review 210: 510–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magurran A.E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda F. 1942. Estudios sobre la vegetacion de Mexico. III. Notas sobre la vegetacion del suroeste del estado de Puebla. Anales del Instituto de Biolog?a. UNAM Tomo XIII 2: 417–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda F. 1947. Estudios sobre la vegetacion de Mexico.V. Rasgos de la vegetacion del R?o Balsas. Revista de la Sociedad Mexicana de Historia Natural 8: 95–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda F. 1952. La vegetacion de Chiapas Vol. 1 and 2. Ed. Del Gobierno de Chiapas, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda F. and Hernandez-Xolocotzi E. 1963. Los Tipos de Vegetacion de Mexico y su Clasificacion. Bolet?n de la Sociedad Botanica de Mexico 28: 29–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier R.A and Mittermeier C.G. 1992. La Importancia de la Diversidad Biologica de Mexico. In: Sarukhan J. and Dirzo R. (eds), Mexico Ante los Retos de la Biodiversidad. CONABIO, Mexico, pp. 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney H.A., Bullock S.H. and Medina E. 1995. Introduccion. In: Bullock S.H., Mooney H.A. and Medina E. (eds), Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy P.G. and Lugo A.E. 1986. Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet R.K. 1974. The measurement of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 285–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington R.T., Prado D.A. and Pendry C. 2000. Neotropical seasonally dry forest and Pleistocene vegetation changes. Journal of Biogeography 27: 261–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka E.R. 1966. Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: a review of concepts. American Naturalist 100: 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puig H. 1976.Vegetation de la Huasteca, Mexique. Mission Archeologique et Etnologique Francaise au Mexique, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratter J.A. and Dargie T.C.D. 1992. An analysis of the floristic composition of 26 cerrado areas in Brazil. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 49: 235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratter J.A., Bridgewater S., Atkinson R. and Ribeiro J.F. 1996. Analysis of the floristic composition of the Brazilian cerrado vegetation. II. Comparison of the woody vegetation of vn 98 areas. Edinburgh Journal of Botany 53: 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J. 1978. Vegetacion de Mexico. Ed. Limusa, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J. 1991a. Diversidad y or?genes de la flora fanerogamica de Mexico. Acta Botanica Mexicana 14: 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J. 1991b. El endemismo en la flora fanerogamica mexicana: una apreciacion anal?tica preliminar. Acta Botanica Mexicana 15: 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowski J. and Calderon G. 1987. El Bosque tropical caducifolio de la region mexicana del Baj?o. Trace 12: 12–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarukhan J. and Dirzo R. 2001. Biodiversity-rich countries. In: Levin S.A. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 419–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPP (Secretar?a de Programacion y Presupuesto) 1981. Atlas Nacional del Medio F?sico. SPP, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ter Steege H., Sabatier D., Castellanos H., Van Andel T., Duivenvoorden J., Adalardo de Oliveira A. et al. 2000. An analysis of the floristic composition and diversity of Amazonian forest including those of the Guiana Shield. Journal of Tropical Ecology 16: 801–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornthwaite C.W. 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review 38: 55–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo C. 1982. El genero Bursera (Burseraceae) en el estado de Guerrero (Mexico), Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Mexico, DF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trejo I. 1996. Caracter?sticas del medio f?sico de la selva baja caducifolia en Mexico. Investigaciones Geograficas. Bolet?n Instituto de Geograf?a. Numero Especial 4: 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trejo I. 1998. Distribucion y diversidad de selvas bajas de Mexico: relaciones con el clima y el suelo Ph.D. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, Mexico, DF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trejo I. and Dirzo R.2000. Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biological Conservation 94: 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia R., Balslev H. and Paz y Mino G. 1994. High tree alpha-diversity in Amazonian Ecuador. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villasenor J.L., Davila P. and Chiang F. 1990. Fitogeograf?a del Valle de Tehuacan-Cuicatlan. Bolet?n de la Sociedad Botanica de Mexico 50: 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E.O. 1988. Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Geografia, UNAM, AP 20-850, DF, 04510, Mexico, Mexico

    Irma Trejo

  2. AP 70-275, DF, 04510, Mexico, Mexico

    Rodolfo Dirzo

Authors
  1. Irma Trejo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodolfo Dirzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trejo, I., Dirzo, R. Floristic diversity of Mexican seasonally dry tropical forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 11, 2063–2084 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020876316013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020876316013

Search

Navigation