Skip to main content
Log in

Airborne Chemical Communication in the Wolf Spider Pardosa milvina

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most studies involving chemical communication in spiders focus on contact pheromones attached to spider silk. Here we tested if males of the wolf spider Pardosa milvina use airborne pheromones to identify, locate, and follow females. Using a two-choice olfactometer, we tested the response of adult male P. milvina to a number of potential chemical cues while controlling for concomitant visual and vibratory stimuli. An airborne chemical cue from adult virgin female P. milvina elicited a positive taxis response from the male. We also tested adult male responses to penultimate instar female P. milvina, one adult male P. milvina, and two adult males together. In each case, test males showed no attraction to the stimuli. Additional experiments were run with pitfall traps baited with adult virgin female P. milvina as attractants. Again, we controlled for visual and vibratory cues from females. Pitfall traps containing virgin females captured significantly more males than control traps. Collectively, these experiments demonstrate evidence of an airborne sex pheromone in P. milvina.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ayyagari, L. R., and Tietjen, W. J. 1986. Preliminary isolation of male-inhibitory pheromone of the spider Schizocosa ocreata (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 13:237-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. W., and Vehrencamp, S. L. 1998. Principles of Animal Communication. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 882 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultman, T. L., and Uetz, G. W. 1982. Abundance and community structure of forest floor spiders following litter manipulation. Oecologia 55:34-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, F. A., and Shear, W. A. 1981. Observations on the natural history of Sphodros abboti and Sphodros rufipes (Araneae, Atypidae), with evidence for a contact sex pheromone. J. Arachnol. 9:317-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dondale, C. D., and Hegdekar, B. M. 1973. The contact sex pheromone of Pardosa lapidicina Emerton (Araneida: Lycosidae). Can. J. Zool. 51:400-401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foelix, R. F. 1996. Biology of Spiders. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 306 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M. J. 1978. Locomotory activity and the predation strategy of the wolf-spider Pardosa amentata (Clerck) (Lycosidae). Anim. Behav. 26:31-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallander, H. 1967. Range and movements of the wolf spiders Pardosa chelata (O. F. Miller) and P. pullata (Clerck). Oikos 18:360-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegdekar, B. M., and Dondale, C. D. 1969. A contact sex pheromone and some response parameters is lycosid spiders. Can. J. Zool. 47:1-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyashita, T., and Hayashi, H. 1996. Volatile chemical cue elicits mating behavior of cohabiting males of Nephila clavata (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J. Arachnol. 24:9-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, C. J. J. 1970. Relation between habitat structure and development of the glandulae ampullaceae in eight wolf spider species (Pardosa, Araneae, Lycosidae). Oecologia 5:185-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, C. J. J., Stolting, H. C. J., and Vlijm, L. 1971. Silk production in adult females of the wolf spider Pardosa amentata (Lycosidae, Araneae). J. Zool. London 165:285-290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarinana, F. O., Kittredge, J. S., and Lowrie, D. C. 1971. A preliminary investigation of the sex pheromone of Pardosa ramulosa. Notes Arachnol. Southwest. 2:9-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, S. J., Uetz, G. W., and Stratton, G. E. 1996. Sexual selection, male morphology, and the efficacy of courtship signalling in two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 38:17-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, S., and Toft, S. 1993. Identification of a sex pheromone from a spider. Science 260:1635-1637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, H. H. 1976. Animal Communication by Pheromones. Academic Press, New York, 167 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, R. B., and Hirscheimer, A. J. 1986. Multiple web-borne pheromones in a spider Frontinella pyramitela (Araneae, Linyphiidae). Anim. Behav. 34:748-753.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, R. B., and Renkes, G. 1984. The courtship of Frontinella pyramitela (Araneae, Linyphiidae): patterns, vibrations and functions. J. Arachnol. 12:37-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietjen, W. J. 1979. Tests for olfactory communication in four species of wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae). J. Arachnol. 6:197-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tietjen, W. J., and Rovner, J. S. 1982. Chemical communication in lycosids and other spiders, pp. 249-279, in P. N. Witt and J. S. Rovner (eds.). Spider Communication. Mechanisms and Ecological Significance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. E., Marshall, S. D., Rypstra, A. L., and Taylor, D. H. 1999. The effects of hunger on locomotor behaviour in two species of wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae). Anim. Behav. In press.

  • Watson, P. J. 1986. Transmission of a female sex pheromone thwarted by males in the spider Linyphia litigiosa (Araneae, Linyphiidae). Science 223:219-221.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Searcy, L.E., Rypstra, A.L. & Persons, M.H. Airborne Chemical Communication in the Wolf Spider Pardosa milvina . J Chem Ecol 25, 2527–2533 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020878225553

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020878225553

Navigation