Skip to main content
Log in

Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shift in corporate strategy, from vertical integration to strategic alliances, has developed hand in hand with the evolution of organizational structure, from the vertically integrated firm to the network organization. The result has been the elimination of boundaries, more flexible organizations, and a greater interaction among individuals and organizations. On the negative side, the specialization of firms on single areas of competence has resulted in the disaggregation of the value chain and in the disaggregation of ethical and legal responsibility. To illustrate this point, the paper considers some cases, such as the case of the "beer girls" of Southeast Asia, who are used unethically by distributors to sell beer and liquor. To deal with the problem of the disaggregation of ethical responsibility, managers can use organizational culture and ethical values to control the performance of employees and of other organizations. Contemporary developments in business ethics also offer tools for dealing with the problem. For example, "global corporate citizenship," integrated social contracting theory, and stakeholder learning dialogues provide ways of integrating the interests of all stakeholders. The task is now to use these new approaches to create a governance process that incorporates the voices of all stakeholders, especially the voices of those stakeholders that have legitimate and urgent moral claims, but lack the power to establish those claims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achrol, R. S.: 1997, ‘Changes in the Theory of Interorganizational Relations in Marketing: Toward a Network Paradigm’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(1), 56-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L.: 1999, Re-creating the Corporation; A Design of Organizations for the 21st Century(Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alchian, A. and H. Demsetz: 1972, ‘Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization’, American Economic Review 62, 777-795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R.: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation(Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buono, A. F. and G. A. Hachey: 1993, ‘Ethical Gaps in Financial Services Networks: Lessons from the Mortgage Banking Industry’, Business & the Contemporary World 5(4), 140-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calton, J. M. and N. B. Kurland: 1996, ‘A Theory of Stakeholder Enabling: Giving Voice to an Emerging Postmodern Praxis of Organizational Discourse’, in D. M. Boje, R. P. Gephart and T. J. Thatchenkery (eds.), Postmodern Management and Organization Theory(Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 154-180.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Calton J. M. and L. J. Lad: 1995, ‘Social Contracting as a Trust-building Process of Network Governance’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5(2), 271-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calton, J. M. and S. L. Payne: 2001, The Paradox of Pluralism: Stakeholder Learning Dialogue as a Cognitive Process for Coping with Business & Society 'Messes'. Paper presented at Academy of Management meeting, Washington, DC.

  • Caminiti, Susan: 1992, ‘The Payoff from a Good Reputation’, Fortune 125(3) (Feb. 10), 74(4).

  • Chandler, A. D.: 1962, Strategy and Structure(MIT Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D.: 1977, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business(Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dess, G. G., A. M. Rasheed, K. J. McLaughlin and R. L. Priem: 1995, ‘The New Corporate Architecture’, Academy of Mangegment Executive 9(3) (August), 7-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T. Dunfee: 1999, Ties That Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics(Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, Robert: 1981, ‘The Quasifirm in the Construction Industry’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2(December), 335-357.

  • Emmelhainz, M. A. and R. J. Adams: 1999, ‘The Apparel Industry Response to "Sweatshop" Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Codes of Conduct’, Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(3) (summer), 51-57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. A., P. S. Barr and M. T. Dacin: 2000, ‘Pluralism and the Problem of Variety’, Academy of Management Review 25(4), 726-734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M.: 1985, ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481-510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, S.: 1998, ‘Fair's Fare’, Supply Management 3(22) (November 5), 22-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry Week: 1994, GE: Just Your Average Everyday $60 Billion Family Grocery Store(May 2), 13-18.

  • Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling: 1976, ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’, Academy of Management Review 20, 404-437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei, D., M. A. Hitt and J. D. Goldhar: 1996, ‘Manufacturing Technology, Organization Design and Strategic Flexibility’, Organization Studies 10(4).

  • McNamee, S. and K. J. Gergen: 1999, Relational Responsibility: Resources for Sustainable Dialogue(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. and S. Stecklow: 2000, ‘Bar Code: Cambodia's "Beer Girls" Peddle the Product and Endure the Hassle’, The Wall Street Journal(May 31), A1.

  • Miles, R. E., C. C. Snow, J. A. Matthews, G. Miles and H. J. Coleman Jr.: 1997, ‘Organizing in the Knowledge Age: Anticipating the Cellular Form’, Academy of Mangement Executive 11(4) (November), 7-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853-886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G.: 1980, ‘Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans’, Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 129-141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, S. L. and J. M. Calton: forthcoming, ‘Toward a Managerial Practice of Stakeholder Engagement: Developing Multi-stakeholder Learning Dialogues’, in J. Andriof, S. Waddock, S. Rahman and B. Husted (eds.), Unfolding Stakeholder Thinking(Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, UK).

  • Ramanujam, V. and P. Varadarajan: 1989, ‘Research on Corporate Diversification: A Synthesis’, Strategic Management Journal 10.

  • Rowley, T.: 2001, SIM Workshop on Network Analysis. Academy of Management Meeting, Washington DC.

  • Schiffrin, A.: 1998, ‘Cambodia Fears Trouble's Brewing with "Beer Girls"’, The Los Angeles Times, August 27, p. 14.

  • Simon, J.: 2000, ‘Gold Standards’, Supply Management 5(12) (June 15), 24-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, D. L.: 1999, ‘Toward an Integrative Theory of Business & Society: A Research Strategy for Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 24(3), 506-521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buren III, H. J.: 2001, ‘If Fairness is the Problem, is Consent the Solution? Integrating ISCT and Stakeholder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 11(3), 481-500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M.: 1996, ‘Why Ethics Matters: A Defense of Ethics in Business Organizations’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2) (April).

  • Valenzuela, J. L. and F. S. Villacorta: 1999, ‘The Relationships between the Companies and their Suppliers’, Journal of Business Ethics 22(3, part 2), 273-280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werhane, P. C.: 1999, Moral Imagination and Management Decision Making(Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies(Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winn, M. I.: 2001, Building Stakeholder Theory with a Decision Modeling Methodology’, Business & Society 40(2), 133-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.: 2002, Leading Corporate Citizens: Vision, Values, Value Added(McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. and R. E. Jones: 1995, ‘Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance’, International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3), 229-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. and J. M. Logsdon: 2002, ‘Business Citizenship: From Individuals to Organizations’, in R. E. Freeman and S. V. Venkataraman (eds.), Ethics and Entrepreneurship. Ruffin Series No. 3. A publication of the Society for Business Ethics, pp. 59-94.

  • Yosie, T. F. and T. D. Herbst: 1998, 'Using Stakeholder Processes in Environmental Decision Making: An Evaluation of Lessons Learned, Key Issues, and Future Challenges. Report on the Risk World website (accessed 6/20/01): http://www. riskworld.com/Nreports/1998/STAKEHOLD/ HTML/nr98aa01.htm.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Daboub, A.J., Calton, J.M. Stakeholder Learning Dialogues: How to Preserve Ethical Responsibility in Networks. Journal of Business Ethics 41, 85–98 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302206747

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021302206747

Navigation