Skip to main content
Log in

Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many liberals have argued that a cosmopolitan perspective on global justice follows from the basic liberal principles of justice. Yet, increasingly, it is also said that intrinsic to liberalism is a doctrine of nationalism. This raises a potential problem for the liberal defense of cosmopolitan justice as it is commonly believed that nationalism and cosmopolitanism are conflicting ideals. If this is correct, there appears to be a serious tension within liberal philosophy itself, between its cosmopolitan aspiration on the one hand, and its nationalist agenda on the other. I argue, however, that this alleged conflict between liberal nationalism and cosmopolitan liberalism disappears once we get clear on the scope and goals of cosmopolitan justice and the parameters of liberal nationalism. Liberal nationalism and cosmopolitan global justice, properly understood, are mutually compatible ideals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barry, B., Statism and Nationalism: A Cosmopolitan Critique, in I. Shapiro and L. Brilmayer (eds.), Global Justice. New York: New York University Press, 1999, pp. 12-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B., Theories of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B., Justice as Impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiner, R. (ed.), Theorizing Nationalism. Albany: SUNY Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C., Political Theory and International Relations, 2nd Ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C., International Liberalism and Distributive Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought. World Politics 51 (1999b), pp. 269-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, C., Social and Cosmopolitan Liberalism, International Affairs 75 (1999c), pp. 515-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canovan, M., Nationhood and Political Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carens, J., Liberalism and Culture, Constellations 4 (1997), pp. 35-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (ed.), For Love of Country. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A., Ethical Universalism and Ethical Particularism, The Journal of Philosophy LXXXV (1988), pp. 283-302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R., What Is So Special About Our Fellow Countryman? Ethics 98 (1988), pp. 663-686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A,. Democratic Citizenship., in J. Cohen (ed.), For Love of Country. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996, pp. 66-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (ed.), Democracy: From City-states to a Cosmopolitan Order?, Prospects for Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.

  • Hurka, T., The Justification of National Partiality, in R. McKim and J. McMahan (eds.), The Morality of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, pp. 139-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. Global Justice: Defending Cosmopolitanism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Patriotism, Morality, and Global Justice, in I. Shapiro and L. Brilmayer (eds.), Global Justice. New York: New York University Press, 1999b, pp. 125-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleingeld, P., Six Varieties of Cosmopolitanism, Journal of the History of Ideas 60/3 (1999), pp. 505-524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. Liberalism, Community, and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., Politics in the Vernacular. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., Territorial Boundaries: A Liberal Egalitarian Perspective, in D. Miller and S. Hashmi (eds.), Boundaries, Ownership and Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001b, pp. 249-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W., Contemporary Political Philosophy, 2nd Ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M., Blood and Belonging: Journeys into the New Nationalism. Toronto: Penguin Books, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, J., How Liberal can Nationalism be?, in R. Beiner (ed.), Theorizing Nationalism. Albany: SUNY Press, 1998, pp. 167-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moellendorf, D., Cosmopolitan Justice. Boulder: Westview Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKim, R. and McMahan, J. (eds.), The Morality of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., The Limits of Cosmopolitan Justice, in Mapel and Nardin (eds.), International Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 164-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., Cosmopolitan Nationalism. The Monist 82 (1999), pp. 446-468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., Patriotism and Cosmopolitanism, in J. Cohen (ed.), For Love of Country. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996, pp. 2-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., Cultivating Humanity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., Duties of Justice, Duties of Material Aid: Cicero's Problematic Legacy. The Journal of Political Philosophy 8/2 (2000a), pp. 176-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., Women and Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000b.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, O., Bounds of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B., The Incoherence of Nationalism, in R. Beiner (ed.), 1999, pp. 295-326.

  • Pogge, T., Realizing Rawls. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T., Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty, Ethics 103 (1992), pp. 48-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T., An Egalitarian Law of Peoples, Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (1994), pp. 195-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T., The Bounds of Nationalism, in J. Couture, K. Nielsen, M. Seymour (eds.), Rethinking Nationalism. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 1998, pp. 463-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M., The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self, in Shlomo Avineri and Avner De-Shalit (eds.), Communitarianism and Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 12-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel, M., Democracy's Discontent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, S. (ed.), Consequentialism and its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, S., Conceptions of Cosmopolitanism, Utilitas 11 (1999), pp. 255-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlereth, T., The Cosmopolitan Ideal in Enlightenment Thought. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A., Development as Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, I. and L. Brilmayer (eds.), Global Justice. New York: New York University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, H., Basic Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980, (2nd Ed., 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.G., A New Bretton Woods: Reforming the Global Financial System, in J. Michie and J.G. Smith (eds.), Global Instability: The Political Economy of World Economic Governance. London: Routledge, 1999, pp. 227-251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamir, Y., Liberal Nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.C., Toleration, Diversity, and Global Justice. College Park, PA: Penn State Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K.C., Critical Notice of John Rawls's The Law of Peoples. The Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (2001), pp. 113-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D., Democratic Theory and Global Society. The Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1999), pp. 111-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J., Minority Rights and the Cosmopolitan Alternative. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 25 (1992), pp. 751-793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, J., What is Cosmopolitan? The Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2000), pp. 227-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., The Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics. Philosophy and Public Affairs 9 (1980), pp. 209-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., Comment, in A. Gutmann (ed.), Multiculturalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994, pp. 99-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., Responses, in D. Miller, and Walzer (eds.), Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press., 1995, pp. 281-297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M., A Multinational Continuum: A Critique of Will Kymlicka's Ethnic-Nation Dichotomy. Constellations 4 (1997), pp. 48-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolo, D., Cosmopolis: Prospects for World Government. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, KC. Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5, 431–461 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021339410934

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021339410934

Navigation