Skip to main content
Log in

Remarks on the Absentminded Driver

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Piccione and Rubinstein (1997) present and analyse the sequential decision problem of an “absentminded driver”. The driver's absentmindedness (imperfect recall) leads him to time-inconsistent strategy evaluations. His original evaluation gets replaced by a new one under impact of the information that the circumstances have changed, notwithstanding the fact that this change in circumstances has been expected by him all along. The time inconsistency in strategy evaluation suggests that such an agent might have reason to renege on his adopted strategy. As we shall see, however, this danger is only apparent. There is no serious problem of dynamic inconsistency in this case. My diagnosis of the case under consideration is in many respects similar to the one provided by Aumann, Hart and Perry (1997), but the analysis leading to this diagnosis is not quite the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aumann, R. J., S. Hart, and M. Perry, ‘The Absent-Minded Driver’, Games and Economic Behavior 20:102–16, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asheim, G. B., ‘Individual and Collective Time-Consistency’, The Review of Economic Studies 64:427–43, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Levi, I., ‘Rationality, Prediction, and Autonomous Choice’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy supp. 19:339–63, 1989; reprinted in Levi (1997), pp. 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Levi, I., ‘Consequentialism and Sequential Choice’, in M. Bacharach and S. Hurley (eds), Foundations of Decision Theory, Blackwell, pp. 92–122, 1991; republished in a slightly different form in Levi (1997), pp. 70–101.

  5. Levi, I., The Covenant of Reason, Cambridge University Press, 1997.

  6. McClennen, E. F., Rationality and Dynamic Choice, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

  7. Piccione, M. and A. Rubinstein, ‘On the Interpretation of Decision Problems with Imperfect Recall’, Games and Economic Behavior 20:3–24, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rabinowicz, W., ‘On Seidenfeld's Criticism of Sophisticated Violations of the Independence Axiom’, Theory and Decision 43:279–92, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rabinowicz, W., ‘Does Deliberation Crowd Out Self-Prediction?’, forthcoming in Erkenntnis, 2000.

  10. Schick, F., ‘Self-Knowledge, Uncertainty and Choice’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30:232–52, 1979; reprinted in P. Gärdenfors and N.-E. Sahlin (eds), Decision, Probability and Utility, Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 270–86.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schick, F., ‘Surprise, Self-Knowledge and Commonality’, Journal of Philosophy 97:440–53, 2000; for an earlier version see B. Hansson, S. Halldén, W. Rabinowicz and N.-E. Sahlin (eds), Spinning Ideas — An Electronic Festschrift for Peter Gärdenfors, 1999, http://www.lucs.lu.se/spinning/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Spohn, W., ‘Where Luce and Krantz Do Really Generalize Savage's Decision Model’, Erkenntnis 11:113–34, 1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Spohn, W., Grundlagen der Entscheidungstheorie, Scriptor Verlag, 1978.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rabinowicz, W. Remarks on the Absentminded Driver. Studia Logica 73, 241–256 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022936030634

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022936030634

Navigation